Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Probably still better to sell/return and get the EFR7670 in T3. :71_smiling_imp::71_smiling_imp:

... won't be twinscroll tho. So buy it in T4.

The hype over transient response is real for those turbos.

I'd rather have a fabricated manifold change and not have to change all your other stuff, versus using an adapter and have to fabricate your intake, dump pipe, and have a gasket, bolts that come loose.

Plus all the other shit involved with mounting a turbo which I cryraged about many times with many failed f**kin turbine to manifold gaskets and shit, why double up. Get a f**kin twinscroll Vband manifold :D

You could realistically also just change your manifold entirely. That may be cheaper or more expensive depending on what the quote is, versus buying a new manifold, selling current manifold cost, waiting for fabricator versus waiting for delivery on replacement item, then dealing with "It mounts in the same spot!" to find out that alas, it is slightly different requiring fabrication anyway :D

Or you could just YOLO it with a single scroll rear housing... but we're well into 'but what's most optimal...' now.

3 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

Probably still better to sell/return and get the EFR7670 in T3. :71_smiling_imp::71_smiling_imp:

... won't be twinscroll tho. So buy it in T4.

The hype over transient response is real for those turbos.

I'd rather have a fabricated manifold change and not have to change all your other stuff, versus using an adapter and have to fabricate your intake, dump pipe, and have a gasket, bolts that come loose.

Plus all the other shit involved with mounting a turbo which I cryraged about many times with many failed f**kin turbine to manifold gaskets and shit, why double up. Get a f**kin twinscroll Vband manifold :D

You could realistically also just change your manifold entirely. That may be cheaper or more expensive depending on what the quote is, versus buying a new manifold, selling current manifold cost, waiting for fabricator versus waiting for delivery on replacement item, then dealing with "It mounts in the same spot!" to find out that alas, it is slightly different requiring fabrication anyway :D

Or you could just YOLO it with a single scroll rear housing... but we're well into 'but what's most optimal...' now.

You’re one high-energy passionate enthusiast and I’m here for it! Haha. But too late! Went with the G30-660 with a custom built housing! I asked Tao from HyperGearTurbo if he could add the option on the website and he agreed! So if there ever is another poor soul in my situation they now have the option to buy it ;) 

Total for supercore + housing: ~$3585AUD

and I was considering turbos from Pulsar/ HyperGear for  $1400-2500 AUD 

…Well! I’ll post up the dyno results when I get to that stage! Thank you all for your input!!

Sincerely,

A less hot, learning head 

Edited by Eric0
Typo
  • Like 2
4 hours ago, Eric0 said:

You’re one high-energy passionate enthusiast

Haha a polite way of describing Greg...

If you've ever followed his many builds, you'll see he constantly gets Greged or Gregged up.

Him a few others on here are masters of BW EFR propaganda, don't mess with them because you'll get EFRed up

Dad jokes are strong as of late.

  • Haha 1

It will work great. Water under the bridge by the time it's up and running. The G Series platform is probably the most absolutely rock solid option you could have possibly chosen.

Some of us.....like me.... have travelled many paths and know from experience that some options, decisions, paths are better than others.... :p

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
3 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

have travelled many paths and know from experience that some options, decisions, paths are better than others.... 😛

Haha... The SAU old timers, we've been there, done that and still haven't learnt our lesson(s).

21 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

It will work great. Water under the bridge by the time it's up and running. The G Series platform is probably the most absolutely rock solid option you could have possibly chosen.
 

Sorry I don't agree, at least for the G30-770/900, The G30-660 isn't far off to a 700 response wise and doesn't make as much power.  Referring to my last few dyno runs from Rb30det. Power and response of the two G series tested were no where near to the current model ATR43SS-3. But I respect everyone’s preferences. Free data for everyone who’s interested to know the performance ceiling of those two G series turbochargers. 

All three turbos run to a point that no more power could be made / no more boost could be held. Everything else apart from the turbo stay unchanged.

atr43ss3powerlabeled.jpg

atr43ss3boostlabeled.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 5 weeks later...

UPDATE:

Hi all! 

As we are getting towards the end of this thread where I’ll showcase final dyno numbers and graph, I wanted to provide an update.

Tao from HyperGear has done an amazing job building the custom divided T3 housing for the G30. Communication was flawless, price was great, and now the housing is estimated to arrive in 7-10 days! Very very pleased.

I must add, if someone is looking for an affordable turbo and end up reading this thread, I would recommend HyperGear. Genuine brands are the way to go as their proven reliability, predictable performance, and there’s a plethora of information available for specs, flow, and more. This HyperGear recommendation is based on their excellent communication, dedication, and willingness to listen to their customers. I particularly liked their ability to create custom adaptations tailored to specific needs, which is a HUGE benefit over other brands. And if we consider the HyperGear provided dyno results, it adds reassurance knowing their turbos can compete against genuine brands.

Next update will be after the dyno!

 

g30th.jpeg

g30thb.jpeg

g30thc.jpeg

Edited by Eric0
  • Like 6
  • 1 month later...

Okay! I finally have the results! RB25DET with authentic G-Series G30-660. I wish I could share logs and tuning other details but the tuner was very reserved and didn’t want to provide it… anyway 
 
I’ve met my power goal! 521HP on pump and 620HP on e85. The sad part is I had a small boost leak that was discovered after finalizing my pump tune but with there being a schedule to uphold, the shop fixed the leak, and moved on to e85. I think we would’ve seen a better boost response and HP increase. 
 

The tuner said this:

starts building pressure at 3,300RPM

max boost at 4200RPM (27PSI)

Drops off to 22PSI short of 7000RPM and at 7700RPM it starts choking the engine 


Overall, with my goal of hitting full boost within 3,500-3,800 RPM, I was just 400 RPM short of the latter target. My other goal was 450hp, but the setup exceeded expectations with 521hp! I'm super happy with it! MAN, let me tell you, the car felt absolutely violent on my way back from the shop. Haha. I did a pull from third gear and I hit the rev limiter hard because I wasn't expecting it to go from 3k to 8k so much faster than when I had the GTX3076R.

What do you guys think? I welcome all feedback! 

IMG_5393.jpeg

  • Like 5

You're making 27psi by 4200rpm, savage!

Meanwhile I'm making 14psi lol.

Very fun street setup, I bet the tyres want to turn to butter each time you cycle through the gears. I hope you have a proper LSD at the back, i.e. not the factory centre.

Proof twin scroll is worth the effort/cost.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...