Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

The hardcore tracks1ut guys I know would flush their brake fluid every 6 to 12 months depending on the amount of track work they did.

Unlike most of us SAU guys, probably flush it once a decade 🥲

LandCruiser used to get a fluid flush every 12 to 18 months.

 

Only because it was about that often the electric motor on the master for brake assist kept dieing and needing to come off.

16 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

That's not very Toyota of the Toyota!

They've had some weird failures on their brake actuators. One of them was because they added some kind of lubricant to the factory fill brake fluid that aftermarket brake fluid didn't have so it would affect the seals. Another was just mysterious, probably internal corrosion or something eating away at Prius brake actuators. Parts alone for those are a few thousand USD so not a cheap fix.

  • Sad 1
On 28/02/2025 at 4:30 PM, Predator1 said:

How hard are you tracking it?

 

Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup.

I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!

  • Like 5
4 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Wait, they're claiming UNOPENED fluid has a shelf life of only 18 months? :/

Yeah, that and throwing away opened, part used, closed back up bottles has got to be bullshit.

Brake fluid sits in not-very-well sealed master cylinder reservoirs for literal years and keeps working (albeit we know we should flush it every couple of years - it actually still works). Anything kept in a bottle in the shed with a tightly capped lid has got to be a million times better than what has been in the car for the same length of time.

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Yeah, that and throwing away opened, part used, closed back up bottles has got to be bullshit.

Brake fluid sits in not-very-well sealed master cylinder reservoirs for literal years and keeps working (albeit we know we should flush it every couple of years - it actually still works). Anything kept in a bottle in the shed with a tightly capped lid has got to be a million times better than what has been in the car for the same length of time.

I have multiple bottles in a shed that gets hot, and I'm in SEQ, so it's humid.

Maybe we test their theory... Anyone have a system to accurately measure moisture content in oil? :/

18 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Maybe we test their theory... Anyone have a system to accurately measure moisture content in oil?

I'm sure there are specific hygrometers for it. But if you can just throw a high enough ranged temp sensor (theromcouple that came with your DMM, for example) into a pot of it on the BBQ, you can see when it boils.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, MBS206 said:

I have multiple bottles in a shed that gets hot, and I'm in SEQ, so it's humid.

Maybe we test their theory... Anyone have a system to accurately measure moisture content in oil? :/

Brake Fluid testers are cheap and readily available....eg https://www.supercheapauto.com.au/p/endeavour-brake-fluid-tester-rechargeable/SPO9539349.html

53 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Hmm. Two terminals. Probably just conductivity. If you knew the shape of the curve, you could probably just do it with a multimeter.

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Hmm. Two terminals. Probably just conductivity. If you knew the shape of the curve, you could probably just do it with a multimeter.

After a quick read, it's just conductivity testing.

Might grab the DMM at work and do a 4 wire test on some oil for science. I think Sarah's car is due for a fluid change, so capturing a reading from her old fluid, reading from my unopened old bottles, and then I'll grab a brand new bottle. We'll have to see how far it all varies. :)

And possibly after this weekend I might be able to steal a spot on a hoist in the workshop across from work to even do the brake bleed easily (yeah, I still hate jacking cars and working on the ground, so I do it in style when possible 😛 )

 

I'll get a small jig printed for the probes so we know we're perfectly keeping the probes at the same distance. :)

 

Using 4 wire should work perfectly, as it's applying a voltage to measure current, and measuring the voltage drop. :) that's my theory without being a chemical/physics engineer. GTSBoy, any thoughts on how you'd do it with a benchtops DMM?

5 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Using 4 wire should work perfectly, as it's applying a voltage to measure current, and measuring the voltage drop. :) that's my theory without being a chemical/physics engineer. GTSBoy, any thoughts on how you'd do it with a benchtops DMM?

Hmm. Tough one. Without knowing where the conductivity value is supposed to sit, it's hard to know whether a standard DMM set to an available ohms setting would be able to measure anything. Ohms being the inverse of what we're talkng about and probably good enough for the girls I go out with.

But if you want to go all hoity toity with a 4 wire rig - go ahead. It can only be more accurate - just in case more accuracy or repeatability turns out to be required.

If you're going to the effort, just go chuck the ohm-mage probes into the car's reservoir and see if you can measure anything at all?

A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post".
If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"...
Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...

 

Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards.

I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it".

This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality.


In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c)
Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....

 

As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. :/
From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...