Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO Stock engine

HyperGear high flowed Turbocharger
ID 1000cc injectors
Walbro 460L fuel pump

Power FC + Z32 AFM
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x81mm PWR Cooler kit
3inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs

Turbosmart 45mm external gate welded on exhaust manifold.

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

At higher boost level we've reached 340rwkws before experiencing ignition break down.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mgz8Wzyc6X0&t=6s

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO Stock engine
HyperGear ATR45SS Turbocharger
ID 1000cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Power FC + Z32 AFM
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x81mm PWR Cooler kit
3inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Turbosmart 45mm external gate welded on exhaust manifold.

Car made 400rwkws @ 24psi, E85 fuel. Hitting 20psi by 4000RPM.

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

spacer.png

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

S1 rb25

Built motor

6boost

Precision 6062

Twin 45mm gates plumbed into exhaust

4inch turbo back exhaust

600x300x100 intercooler

1650cc injectors

Haltech platinum pro 

United e85

Stopped at 29psi as we were worried about the headstuds giving way. 

710hp @29psi

Sorry for the poor video quality 

20190515_163330.jpg

Edited by r33ryan
  • Like 7

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO refreshed engine
HyperGear ATR45SAT Turbocharger
ID 1000cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Haltech ECU
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x100mm Cooler kit
3.5 inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Turbosmart 45mm external gate welded on exhaust manifold.

Car made 420rwkws @ 25psi, E85 fuel. Hitting 240rwkws / 20psi by 3800RPM.

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Rb25det s1 unopened

Haltech Platinum Pro plugin

Gtx3076r gen 2 twinscroll

6boost

Twin Turbosmart 50mm gates

Plazmaman plenum 

1000cc Bosch injectors 

Bunch of other stuff

 

376hp at 20psi on 98 - expected a little more

 

Soon to be tuned for e85

 

Screenshot_20190607-183124_Messenger.jpg

My old R33 after i sold it.

ATR45SS turbo
4" intake pipe
External gate on stock manifold
Z32 MAF
Trust return flow fmic
Splitfire coilpacks
Clean injection fuel rail
3" hks super drager exhaust
Standard cat
Z32 nistune ecu
98Ron
17psiDyno.jpeg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Rb25det unopened engine
HyperGear High flowed R33 Turbocharger
ID 1000cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Haltech ECU
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x100mm Cooler kit
3.5 inches turbo back exhaust
3inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Internally gated factory exhaust manifold.

Car made 342rwkws @ 20psi, E85 fuel.

front.jpg

342rwkw.jpg

boost.jpg  

 

boost.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

I used to come into here to find what people had tried and what was needed to run to get 'x' power so might help some looking to push rb25 and a real world example

 

 

Comparison between old GTX3076 0.82 with spitfires and std CAS  vs GTX3582 Gen ll 0.82 with Audi R8 coils and new CAS

 

 

This is for circuit car  - anything else I think the (new or old) GTX 3076 is pretty solid for 450 to high 500hp's

 

Done on a roller :

 

Old GTX 3076 0.82 setup on 24.5 psi - 550hp and 620nm   - was awesome overall - good response - noses over at 7K

 

New GTX3582 gen ll 0.82   on 23 psi - 570hp 

                                                 on 26 psi 663.5hp and 700nm - havent driven it yet but woke up with psi and wanted to keep making powas

 

 

 

Relevant things:

 

Rb25 built

Poncams

Audi R8 coils

New CAS
 

6 Boost

Bosch 1600 cc Injectiors

Plasmaman plenum

Koyo Rad

PWR 500 x 300 intercooler 2" piping

3" straight through exh

45 Ext gate to screamer

GTX3582 0.82 Gen ll

PPG 5 speed dog box

4.11 diff ratio

 

1495892058_DynoRb25Gtx3582genllvsgtx3076.thumb.jpg.03eaf21172dc6e4113edf368ec18e914.jpg

1771464282_Newenginebay.thumb.jpg.45078f3056cd6259be8629672a2a3522.jpg

 

Edited by bcozican
  • Like 6

Got my car tuned finally by DVS JEZ after having some issues with "less competent" tuners in Canberra.  I know my setup is not ideal (return-flow) but was hesitant to spend money on restrictive parts if i needed to spend money first on fundamental running issues. 

 

Setup is as follows:

R32 Nistune ECU

EFI solutions Top fuel rail kit,  stock FPR with Bosch 0 280 157 187 495cc Injectors

Bosch Z32 AFM

3" Turbo back (bellmouth, port matched) 3" 100 cel 4" body Venom cat, straight through mufflers

Hypergear G2 21U Highflow

Greddy Profec OLED EBC

Custom Hard 3" intake pipe joining to stock Airbox, Return Bov

Return flow AVO Turboworld intercooler

R32 10psi actuator pre-loaded 3mm

GTR BOV

NPC clutch

SPlitfire coilpacks

Standard Walbro 255 with the wiring mod. 

 

Overall result is pretty good but quoted from Jez couldn't get more out of it "too prone to detonation", note the 230kw run was abandoned. so running 223Kw on 16psi

 

Now i know its running right i am looking to buy a new intercooler either HDI or Plazmaman and the 5" body 100cel 3" cat and then getting the tune tidied up a bit. 

 

My initial goal was to make the most responsive setup compared to stock turbo running 98 and airbox (hate the sound of pod filter) hence g2 profile choice. Can see my old tune in second pic of stock turbo and breathing mods.

 

Tao what do you think of the result? Besides changing the above (intercooler and cat)  and staying on 98 and an airbox (happy to modify it), is there anything else i can do to increase response/boost response.

 

Kind regards

Patrick 

 

 

 

 

hypergear 21u g2, nistune, dvs tune.jpg

old tune stock turbo, inj,afm, return flow, safc.jpg

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, Pattey21 said:

Got my car tuned finally by DVS JEZ after having some issues with "less competent" tuners in Canberra.  I know my setup is not ideal (return-flow) but was hesitant to spend money on restrictive parts if i needed to spend money first on fundamental running issues. 

 

Setup is as follows:

R32 Nistune ECU

EFI solutions Top fuel rail kit,  stock FPR with Bosch 0 280 157 187 495cc Injectors

Bosch Z32 AFM

3" Turbo back (bellmouth, port matched) 3" 100 cel 4" body Venom cat, straight through mufflers

Hypergear G2 21U Highflow

Greddy Profec OLED EBC

Custom Hard 3" intake pipe joining to stock Airbox, Return Bov

Return flow AVO Turboworld intercooler

R32 10psi actuator pre-loaded 3mm

GTR BOV

NPC clutch

SPlitfire coilpacks

Standard Walbro 255 with the wiring mod. 

 

Overall result is pretty good but quoted from Jez couldn't get more out of it "too prone to detonation", note the 230kw run was abandoned. so running 223Kw on 16psi

 

Now i know its running right i am looking to buy a new intercooler either HDI or Plazmaman and the 5" body 100cel 3" cat and then getting the tune tidied up a bit. 

 

My initial goal was to make the most responsive setup compared to stock turbo running 98 and airbox (hate the sound of pod filter) hence g2 profile choice. Can see my old tune in second pic of stock turbo and breathing mods.

 

Tao what do you think of the result? Besides changing the above (intercooler and cat)  and staying on 98 and an airbox (happy to modify it), is there anything else i can do to increase response/boost response.

 

Kind regards

Patrick 

 

 

 

 

hypergear 21u g2, nistune, dvs tune.jpg

old tune stock turbo, inj,afm, return flow, safc.jpg

Sorry put the question on the wrong thread, posted on hypergears

  • 1 month later...

whats going on hoons? long time reader first time poster - here is a basic set up that has pulled in some decent rewards, got me a 2 mins at PI and a 1:47 at winton in full daily drive trim and horrible old clapped out semi slicks

highly recommend adaptronic, advice and turbos from Tao, tunes by chequered

donk: a not tired RB25 S2, 128,000 km, healthy comp, stock internals

hypergear something turbo G03 rings a bell
adaptronic
deuchwerks 550 side feeds
a shitty TURN FLOW
stock filter box with a K+N panel
a good greddy exhaust, was on it when i got the car, looks like a beauty (3 inch)
a f__king mad catch can rraaahahhhhh

260 kw at 16 psi, not pushing it

that is a good outcome folks
and if you are gonna persevere with a turnflow - make sure you have a real strong actuator spring

IMG_6561.jpg

Edited by 12 second volvo
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO Stock Cams
Nitto Pistons and Rods. 9:1 CPR
HyperGear ATR45SS Turbocharger
ID 1500cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Power FC + Z32 AFM
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x81mm PWR Cooler kit
3inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Twin pulse manifold and twin 40mm gate. (Grey was single scroll manifold with single gate)
Car made 440rwkws @ 27psi, E85 fuel.

440rwkw.jpg

boost.jpg

2 hours ago, hypergear said:

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO Stock Cams
Nitto Pistons and Rods. 9:1 CPR
HyperGear ATR45SS Turbocharger
ID 1500cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Power FC + Z32 AFM
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x81mm PWR Cooler kit
3inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Twin pulse manifold and twin 40mm gate. (Grey was single scroll manifold with single gate)
Car made 440rwkws @ 27psi, E85 fuel.

440rwkw.jpg

boost.jpg

What size of both exhaust housing?

  • 1 month later...

R34 GTT

Rb25det NEO Stock Cams
Nitto Pistons and Rods. 9:1 CPR
HyperGear ATR43SS-2 Turbocharger
ID 1500cc injectors
Walbro 525L fuel pump
Power FC + Z32 AFM
Greedy Profect B EBC
600x300x81mm PWR Cooler kit
3inches turbo back exhaust
4inches intake pipe with Pod
Split fire coil packs
Twin pulse manifold and twin 40mm gate. 
Car made 442rwkws @ 25psi, E85 fuel. With 280rwkws @ 4000RPM

enginebay.jpg

power.jpg

boost.jpg

 

16 hours ago, WR33KD said:

You need to adjust your dyno read out or are these super low torque?

 

Those torque figures are actually correct as it has been derived off the RPM.

Most dyno operators don't bother setting up the derived torque value and just output roller torque on dyno sheets hence it shows higher numbers.

Power (kW) = Torque (N.m) x Speed (RPM) / 9.5488

Ie

Torque (N.m) = Power (kW) * 9.5488 / Speed (RPM)

If you're reading wheel RPM instead of engine RPM your torque values will be higher.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...