Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Still unclear about the AFM correction. Won't this simultaneously affect the tables for fuel as well?

BTW there is possibly a slight driveability improvement with my adjustments listed from yesterday.

You idiots!

Its called an airflow correction table because you are altering airflow values!

You are getting more knock by doing this because your car is running leaner and more prone to pinging.

If you wanna alter ignition, you have to alter the ignition table lol.

Edited by bmxwrx

ok so the airflow correction table is airflow voltage vs inj amount then?

well im not seeing much more knock than i was last time, but what i am seeing is more timing thrown in, so how does that work?

yeah he is right ive just realised its fuel correction table

oh well ill change mine back to what it was

so moving them up higher would have made it rich as all hell yeah ?

in the hacking a datalogit website though it talks about ign vs airflow,

ign vs battery power etc etc etc... ?

I dont think it talks anywhere about inj vs airflow..

also.. it would explain how sam "added some timing" to my pfc without having to change the ign maps.......

yeah he is right ive just realised its fuel correction table

oh well ill change mine back to what it was

so moving them up higher would have made it rich as all hell yeah ?

well looking at dataglogit (the app) it has a table for INJ airflow correction

but can't see any IGN airflow correction, so im not sure. The car felt better when i increased those values, and i saw more timiing on timing monitor so im kinda confused? but i guess it makes sense to be INJ correction instead.

can a powerfc guru confirm/deny ?

airflow correction just bends the signal coming from the airflow meter to the ecu. so it affects both injectors and ign timing.

i don't want to be rude, but with the very thin grasp of tuning you have i wouldn't be touching your handcontroller.

i need a retune, and lately i have been driving around with ignition correction of 4-5degrees advance with next to nothing knock, including heavy load upto the redline. it seems like a lot and im not that game to keep advancing until i get it tuned.

Is there any risks other than knocking if i keep advancing it? And how much have you guys advanced the timing from a base map without knocking?

nah thats fair enough ill just store my airflow correction values back to how they were and keep moving my ign tables up slowly. ive moved mine up a total of 10 deg with great results as far as driveability and response goes and also fuel economy has shifted to much more reasonable values, 400ks.

once i have datalogit (group buy) ill build a knock map and then tune the points that dont knock up

by the way thats the point of this hole thread, to learn some self tuning that doesnt effect the cars reliability, sure if its dangerous / not safe then don't do it, im not say to do stuff thats not safe. to me it seems pointless to have complete engine management only to never manage it, to merely watch and assume its doing its best, soemtime the best tuning is done on the road in real time, you can't simulate everything, well at least in a practical environment anyway?

this thread is merely about learning and trying stuff, hence the DIY title

The tuner where I'm getting my car done at on Saturday apparently mainly uses the airflow table to tune the car - he uses the FC datalogit. Apparently there are usually only a few ignition points he has to fix up but generally pretty good. He is the tuner that Sydney kid uses so I assume he is good

ill ask him if it would be ok to tune the light load areas (igntion) when driving and monitoring the knock

Edited by benl1981

I think the only thing we cant tune is A/F ratios, it would be a nice to be able to rig up a system inside the cabin to have one eye on the A/F ratios and tune it on light , medium and full loads. As long as we have one eye on the "knock" and all ears on ping, a careful backyard tuner should be ok.

Paul , interesting thread and a good read but i have one question . I use a knock link on my track car and notice depending on what fuel i fill up with ( same brand BP ultimate) the knock link sometimes picks up a few knocks on different tanks . You might get "good" batches of fuel and "bad" batches and while adjusting your mixtures to suit every tank is fantastic you might be chasing your tail for most of the time.

adam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...