Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I will buy alibaba site  brake kit. 

Only 515$ brake kit + shipping 180$

https://f2rq3.app.goo.gl/?link=https%3A%2F%2Fm.alibaba.com%2Fproduct%2F60567820585%2FTEI-P60-Car-Disc-Brake-Kit.html&apn=com.alibaba.intl.android.apps.poseidon&ibi=com.alibaba.sourcing&isi=503451073&amv=69

 

One set ordered for my friends supra. I will take some pictures when brakes arrived.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

had a few problems and that is the reason why it takes so long to arrived here.

 

2 packages had to come. one arrived today and tomorrow another one.

TNT is a supplier of packet

 

Disk is 355mm and 6 piston calibers

This kit cost 780 usd.

I will take new picture after all parts has arrived.

20170302_084837.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

NM35 brake rotor and pad part numbers ...

Front (for R34 GTT 4-pot calipers - not standard Stagea fronts)
RDA Dimpled Slotted Rotors, 310 x 30mm: Part No. RDA7597D
Project Mu NS400 pads: Part No. F236

Rear (for standard Stagea NM35 rear calipers)
RDA Dimpled Slotted Rotors, 296 x 24mm: Part No. RDA7657D
Project Mu NS400 pads: Part No. R209

In case it saves someone some searching.

Edited by Darkmeat
OCD. Something bad was gonna happen if I didn't.
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Has anyone also upgraded the brake booster and master cylinder?

I been investigating this for the s2 stag with r34gtt calipers etc all round.

Some advise they get softer pedal feel or abs doesn't activate like it used to.

Suggestions i've seen are to go the r34gtt brake booster/master cylinder also, 

however they both quote BM50... So whats the diff? is the booster different?

(the only physical difference looking at pics online seems to be the reservoir)

Cheers,

Pete

My memory is going but I believe when I up graded to GTT brakes I kept the stock M/C and booster which was  fine for the job. When I fitted D2 330mm brakes to the front and GTR brakes to the rear I changed the master cylinder (kept the stock booster IIRC)  to BM57 with no ill effects (pulled up straight at high speeds on the track).

And I'm running 32 GTR rear and ATTKD 330mm/8 piston fronts with the standard booster and master cylinder without pedal issues.

What problem are you trying to solve? Because mushy/long pedals almost always come down to bleeding or sometimes pad break in

Thanks Duncan and Bob.

1-2cm extra pedal travel, a tad soft compared to original.

Previously could just rest / weight of my foot on brake pedal to start pulling up. 

Does the much same after swap, but needs a bit extra pressure applied.

Not triggering abs like used to, which was quite easy previously. 

Doesn't feel spongy/sloppy, pulls up a lot better than original setup.

I've bled all calipers, cleared any air bubbles.

Maybe i do the bleed procedure again. RL, RR, FL, FR

Wish to get it back to where it was with just lightest of pedal push.

Cheers,

Pete

 

My pedal is also soft, using the r33 f+r setup. It's pretty normal for this to happen when using bigger/more pistons.

I was going to get a bm57 like most people do, but for the money i've learnt to live with it.

 

It's up to you, Pete. If it annoys you that much get a bm57, if not just let it go and you'll soon forget about it, till you drive a properly setup car... or a new car :P 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...