Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thread is all about the buying, building and using a Tech Edge A/F ratio meter and accesories, I have the following on order;

1 X Wideband 2A0 kit (4.0 cable kit & 7057 connector)

1 X TE-LD02 LED Display kit

1 X 0 258 007 057 LSU sensor

1 X 2A0 to 2A1 upgrade

The all up price is $444 inc GST and postage.

overview.gif

More detail on www.techedge.com.au

Any other guys building, buying or using A/F ratio meteres it would be good to compare our experiences.

:O cheers :)

PS; when I have finished building and testing this unit, it will be available for renting.

Edited by Sydneykid
  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

SK I've been thinking of making a kit for a while to fine tune the PFC, so good luck and I'm keen to see the results. This one must be alright to interest you so it could be a winner.

Does it specifically need the LSU sensor or can the famed Falcon one from the Silicon chip book be an alternative given JE's findings?

Thanks, for that SK, I was planning on putting one of these together for the PFC. This (and the link) gives me a little more direction. I'll post up my results when I'm done.

Hi guys, I brought the tech edge kit 3 years ago and have brought the later model one 6 months ago. I built both of them and have found them to be excellent in form and function. I output the 0-5v to my FC-Datalogit and datalog AFRS whle I tune on the dyno. Also useful for checking 4WD's on the road as we only have a 2wD Dyno Dynamics dyno at work.

Great product!

H谋 SK

Just read your reply 谋n the other thread AFR'S and good old knock - I purchased the 2e0 k谋t about two months ago (about 350AUD 谋f I remember r谋ghtly) but w谋ll have to wa谋t unt谋l december when I arr谋ve back from overseas to assemble 谋t.

It'll be great to compare - I was look谋ng at the LM1 from Amer谋ca but 谋t was all gett谋ng a b谋t too expens谋ve for what we need 谋t for.

Cheers

Edited by gtst25

ive got the 2a0 in my car right now rigged up thru the greddy e-01's analog input.

so far works a treat and i can use it to limit boost (well boost other than gate) via the e-01's on board limiters.

its a very nice unit indeed but it does take some time to put together and debug properly, but once all is said and done its mint.

as for the o2 sensor i got mine from the local vw DEALER for 65$USD, pretty forking cheap for a wideband.

Well, I gotta say Tech Edge delivery is pretty good, received my order via Express Post this afternoon. They are not shipping the 7057 lambda sensor any more, I received a 7200 instead. Which is not such a bad thing as rumour has it the 7200 is a bit faster in its response.

Tech_Edge_Delivery.jpg

Tech_Edge_Kit.jpg

I won't have time to start on the kit today, maybe tonight I might lay out the parts and check the intructions thoroughly. The kit doesn't ship with the instructions, you have to download/print them from the web site. Luckily I have good quality colour printer. I will start on the display as it is a little smaller and has less components, so I will have a chance to get used to the terminology used.

;) cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid

After a couple of hours of soldering and assembly and the LD02 display is finished;

Tech_Edge_LD02_Made.jpg

I was going to make up the cables after I finished the display, but I can't. I ordered and paid for a 4m cable, that connects the lambda sensor to the WB2A1. But when I checked it a 2.6 metre cable was supplied. This is a good chance to check out Tech Edge support and problem recovery. Email sent 3.30 pm Saturday.

;) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
H谋 SK

It'll be great to compare - I was look谋ng at the LM1 from Amer谋ca but 谋t was all gett谋ng a b谋t too expens谋ve for what we need 谋t for.

Cheers

If you already have a Power FC and FC datalogit you could get the LC-1 which is a plain WB02 which has outputs for standalones. Costs about ~260AUD with sensor.

You really don't need all the extra displays, inputs, etc the expensive WB02's come with. The datalogit or other standalone will already display and and have inputs for whatever you want.

Very impressed with Tech Edge's response to the 2.7 m cable instead of 4.0 m cable error. Sent email advising of problem 3.30 pm Saturday afternoon. Received email response Monday morning at 8.45 am. Promised overnight replacement which arrived today (Tuesday) lunch time via Express Post. A prepaid, addressed, Express Post Envelope was included for me to return the 2.7m cable.

Now that's good recovery from a problem.

:) cheers :)

PS; I have not told Tech Edge that I am writing this review, so this sort of response should be considered what anyone will receive.

Edited by Sydneykid
nice work Gary. looking good mate. how many WB02 sensors/meters do you need!!!:)

We sold one with a race car recently, so this is a replacement. We only have 2, the other one is a Motec which stays in the dyno room (under pain of death).

Why did you get the 2AO instead of the more compact 2CO controller?

I wanted the 1meg of data logging.

:) cheers :)

is there any difference again in using the 7057 (7200) over the 6066???

also where on the site do you order the DIY kit?

Currently working on a diagnostics unit for facotry ECU's that was in Elector magazine (if anyones interested), once thats done i'll be onto one of these, albeit a 2E0

we have one i a 4agze rally car and as previously mentioned had some response issues with the lambda sensor we were originally running the 6066 and upgraded to the 7057 and there was a markable difference so I would say the 7200 will be better again. Initially had some problems with noise and interference again I think it was contributed to the sensor, also moved the unit to a more secure position. Awesome bit of gear for tuning a rally car which are more tempremental to climates (full rain days to desert racing with 40+), and also mid range power and low down torque are more important as there is so much more on off throttle, and this is where we were able to make gains rather than sit on the dyno for hours trying to simulate real driving or just doing full power runs for tuning!!!

I know I am no wizard at making up cables, so I figured I had better do that early in the assembly process. So last night I made up all of the cables;

Tech_Edge_Cables_Made.jpg

The PC cable was pretty easy, only the 9 pin plug had to be attached. I used a cigarette lighter plug and cable I had lying around for the power cable, just soldered the 2A1 plug on the end of the cable. The cable for the lambda sensor is quite tricky, the instructions are good, but many pages when printed out. I had to refer back to the TE web site a couple of times, as the instructions printing doesn't include the attachments/links. So I had to go back and print each one of those separately, that was time consuming.

I think TE must believe that I would be making up the kits in front of my PC, but that's not the case. I don't fancy soldering and heat shrinking on my desk in the office.

Tonight I will get into making the 2A1 itself.

;) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Remove it. Certainly from the hub face. I'm not in love with leaving it on the wheel assembly surface either - but if it is common to do so, then....maybe fair enough. It's not difficult. Just time consuming. For the hub face you just need a large enough block and suitable grades of abrasive paper to get it off flat. The same would be true of the assembly face. Just more time consuming, probably needing a lot more care. It's defo going to be easier just to assemble the wheels as is, seal them up, and check them periodically to see if there's any movement or loosening of the fasteners, than it will be to remove it though.
    • Hello, I got my wheels powder coated and they've powder coated bloody everything the mating surface and hub (even told them not to lol) anyway should I leave it or remove it. (Would be very hard) I've searched a lot and lots of powder coaters don't mask the mating surface but do mask the hub surface. How bad it powder coat on the mating surface or hub? My question is what should I do?
    • Yeah, R34 with RB25DE likely has a 4AX01 box in it, which is a medium duty auto ~ with the RB25DET mill, it would've been fitted with 4AX00 (4AX13) heavy duty build (same case, different internals). An RB25DET will lunch on a medium duty 4R01 auto in pretty short order ...to give you some visual idea of differences between the 'medium' and 'heavy duty' boxes, you only have to look at the 2/4 band for comparison...it's chalk and cheese...(plus bigger high clutch, extra pinion in the planetary sets, higher oil pump output, different bearings, higher TC stall speed )... You can control them with just about any aftermarket TCU for electric-over 4-speed with TC lockup clutch (ie; the GM 4L60E and others)...I have a custom standalone TCU that includes MAP sensor (for turbo applications) along with TPS, RPM, and line pressure monitoring...in other words, I don't use any ECU signals...no real need to.
    • If you want to do the wiring, the GTT engine ecu has the same pinouts extra that the seperate TCM in the NA car has. You can literally grab the wires/pins that lead into the Seperate TCM and wire them into the corresponding pins in the GTT Engine ECU. You could then in theory Nistune it. I realised this when everyone put it in the too hard basket and I actually looked at the f**kin R34 manual. This is after I had previously had a seperate aftermarket TCM controller in my original N/A chassis car and a very built gearbox from a GTT, running a seperate Haltech engine ECU. I ran into this issue when I re-shelled the car into a GTT shell, so my aftermarket TCM was no longer plug and play, because the loom/modules were not present. I was pretty livid when realizing just how simple the original fix actually was. It sat for 3+ years at various workshops trying to find a solution. In practice none of this is a worthwhile idea for a lot of reasons, generally surrounding the shitness of the NA auto, the autos in general that come with skylines, and the NA engine and lack of gains. The gearbox is specced for the 2.5L N/A and barely at that level. If you have to pay anyone any money to do any of this, that is money spent on manualizing the car and it's not even close in terms of a comparison. Learning to drive manual is simpler than going through the pain of dealing with the N/A gearbox and he'll have fun to boot.
  • Create New...