Jump to content
SAU Community

Piggaz

Members
  • Posts

    8,955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    41
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Piggaz

  1. Mate send scotty an email I’m sure he’d be more than willing to clear things up for you .
  2. Didn’t see that you asked me a question, mate. Bin the stock recirc valves. There is no reason why they should still be on the car. Put one of those turbosmart units on the comp cover, turn it all the way to hard and see what it does. ?
  3. That’s sick. Looking forward to whatbyou think about the efr with the “laggy big rear housing”. ?
  4. Away on holidays. Don’t give a shit.
  5. Can’t really put a pressure on it. How does the head flow? What cams? How restrictive is the cooler? The list goes on and on. Buy one, put it in, wire it up. It’s not expensive.
  6. The 9180/0.92 is kind of retarded. If you want the power that the 91 mm compressor can flow/give, you’re not going to get there by choking up the turbine side. So now you have a larger compressor and turbine to turn making it lazier than it needs to be THEN won’t make the power because it’s choked. the 8374/1.05 makes much more sense. No, it won’t be lazy/laggy because of the larger AR rear. Big compressors and small AR rears “to chase response” DONT work.
  7. @gzro The coppermix has gone. The OSG R3C replaced it.
  8. ^^^ Are you measuring exhaust manifold pressure? If it made the power of a 9180, does that make the 9180 redundant?
  9. Another vote for the 8374/1.05 especially on a smaller 2.6L. The OSG triple is a pleasure to drive. The pickup point is lowish, not grabby/bitey. Having had a Nismo coppermix for just on 10 years, I was quite hesitant about going to the OSG triple. Totally unnecessary. * Apprantly they did some changes at some point. Not sure when the change over was but it would have been before July 2015.
  10. Same turbine wheel so it will all work.
  11. 8474 compressor update on a 2.2 Evo. Attatched is the 8374 and 8474 graphs.
  12. True. But then you could just size injectors correctly and not flog the ass out of the pumps.
  13. Stock I’m fairly sure. Would have to confirm that though mate.
  14. Wasn’t it a stock bottom end with a built head?
  15. Buy a Grinder, hack all that twin turbo junk off, install single, boost away. Best advice I can give. ?
  16. From guys that have gone from -5’s/2530’s to a 9180/1.05, it behaves like a pair of -5’s to 4000 rpm then the 9180 will walk away from it. If an 8374/1.05 is on 500 rpm earlier than a pair of -5’s then how much later can a 9180 be? *using -5’s as a yard stick. How hard will you be leaning on it? It won’t be the most responsive setup in the world but you are talking about a 94 lb/minute turbo all in.
  17. Gold digging whore. Give her an onion ring.
  18. Good to see you went the 1.05. It needs it if you want to turn the wick up
  19. Do you plan on building this soon? How hard do you rev it? Any other changes apart from the snail? Its gonna be interesting to see the difference, especially in the real world. Still on the factory gearbox?
  20. How hard do you plan on pushing this thing, turbine speed wise?
×
×
  • Create New...