Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha. I just found an old dusty photo from when I first got the car and scanned it on my crappy scanner but this will give you an idea. It's not overly bright, you could make it brighter with more LED’s, but I like how its subtle.

skyline.jpg

are those R34 GTR rims?

What offset and tyre sizes are you running?

Howd you manage to tuck them under the guards? How much camber you running?

Very nice pics

Yeh, 18x9 +30 with i think they are 235/40/18 tyres. The guards have been pumped, lipped, rolled as much as possible without giving them a dramatic lip and they actually swallow the wheels pretty easily.Now looking for some 10.5" +32 rears to go with 9.5" + 22 fronts

Yeh, 18x9 +30 with i think they are 235/40/18 tyres. The guards have been pumped, lipped, rolled as much as possible without giving them a dramatic lip and they actually swallow the wheels pretty easily.Now looking for some 10.5" +32 rears to go with 9.5" + 22 fronts

ah k, ive only had mine rolled and I know they wont fit under without being pumped haha.

Here is a picture of 255/40/17's 17x9 +30 with -0.5deg camber.

photo294medium.jpg

How much camber are you running on the back?

Just bought this car last week...f**kn 3rd skyline sitting in the garage now...

Blew the engine on the other r32 i have, so decided if im gonna rebuild it its gonna take a couple of months so may as well go out and get a gtr and give the old blue 32 to the missus, already have a project car thats taken 2 years in the making a kakimoto widebody r33 currently with 500 rwkw.

The missus said if i spend anymore on cars she will leave me, which she has tried 3 times this year already haha (she was cleaning the spare room and found 10 boxes of aftermarket parts which i was planning to put in both cars, she cracked the shits i spend money on cars more than her),, so i said if i give her the blue r32 and get my self a standard car i wont touch can we agree to disagree, so got the thumbs up and got the gtr...

specs on this gtr off top of head: 1990 r32 gtr, isc coil overs, rebuilt gearbox straight cut gears etc. 750 cc inj. power fc d jetro, bosch 044 pump, black with purple/red pearl, enkei 18's. thats really about it, just a daily car. So anyways heres a couple of pics of the gtr.

post-32060-1268875207_thumb.jpg

post-32060-1268875247_thumb.jpg

post-32060-1268875281_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...