Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

How many people in the world have the set?

I believe that 2 people have 2/3 Brett

 

Terry-23_zpsbzy9ohtj.jpg

 

I consider myself most fortunate because...
* I hadn't been actively looking for the BCNR33

* I really wasn't disenchanted, despite having knocked back six beforehand

* I was fatalistic, thinking, "If it happens, it happens"

* This one was cleaner than the BNR32 despite the 32R having half the Kms

* Iron Chef had two of us Aussie buyers, and Kristian stated that if we were the last two standing, he wasn't going to permit a bun-fight between us. And therefore, he asked each of us to put in a silent bid - and only one bid. It just so happened that other bidders (for this Grade 4B car), dropped off and we here in Oz were the last ones standing after all.

 

 

  • Like 4
  • 2 weeks later...

I took the silencer off and the RB sound is still there despite a turbo back titanium system.

Terry-55_zpscj0az4q6.jpg

 

It certainly is loud though. I hope there's no droning noise. I'll find out in a couple of days.

Terry-64_zpsz7yajb07.jpg

 

Thanks for looking. I'll leave all the c/f bits on it (fake or real) for a little while and see if I can get my head around it.

Terry-50_zpshvnbfdcb.jpg

 

OS Giken triple is vicious. But I've found a li'l sweet spot where the car can be gently eased forward from a stopped position. Hill starts are a bugger. Lol

  • Like 2

KISS Method for a collectible

9 days, the Repair Shed for 400R c/f rear wing and 400R side skirts and Series 3 front lip paint/fit 

2 weeks 100,000Km Service with Nismo odds and ends fitted.

4 weeks detailer

6 weeks tuner

Thanks for asking...

  • Like 1
6 hours ago, BLUBYU said:

Just purchased this one about a month ago, needs a head gasket. 25/30 325 kw at the wheels

 

IMG_0969.JPG

IMG_0971.JPG

IMG_0974.JPG

IMG_0979.JPG

IMG_0982.JPG

IMG_1042.JPG

Beautiful blue... Do you know what color is used? E.g. from what?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...