Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah on the strip the auto will always be preferable, Id say on a circuit the manual would be almost certainly preferable though. However I guess I was more asking about daily driving as that is what I assume you guys are using your cars mainly for.

Daily driving Sydney is just grid lock. I gave up driving on work Parramatta to Darlinghurst in last Fridays rain after 2 hours of trying to drive 30k, your average rb 26 would have melted by then, I was in a dsg diesel hatch. My other comment is mine was a factory auto, as cars get older the auto of the species is often tighter, neater and less abused, because such cars are less attractive to people like you! I have thought of manual conversion.

Edited by WHITE gtt

Not hating on automatics but just curious what draws you guys to them, apart from it being nicer in stop start traffic around town what makes you guys stick with them? cheers.gif

because they are f**k loads quicker than manuals with a good converter on streeters, and 10 times easier on the drivetrain, full boost all the time, no lag inbetween shifts,

basically feels like you are on a plane going down a runway with big power autos , the pull just builds and builds and builds absolutely seemlessy..you don't feel the shifts as the converter is slipping...awesome feeling

A good torque converter will hold the car on near peak power from throttle on... till redline when it finally locks up.

manuals feel really clunky and horrible after experiencing this!

cheers

darern

Interesting but I don't think it will be high enough, I think I'd need 3000rpm to get it on to boost (or put my 3L in the wagon heh)

Can you PM me what it cost to get that stall built? Cheers :)

Also, is the torque converter the same between R33 and R34?

doesn't work like that, you have to talk to a specialised in autos,HIGHLY preferably with turbo experience or they make a right f**k up of it

a 2800 rpm converter will go to 3500 easily once boost is applied, heck a 3500rpm converter will go to 6500rpm once it has any boost applied to it, A torque converter slips

the more torque applied to it, as boost go up, more torque is applied and the converter slips harder again . Converters are all rated for atmo motors.

cheers

darren

Yeah it certainly does make staying on peak torque for longer a lot easier. I guess I just always found it difficult to flog through the hills/circuit with an auto, compression lock when shifting down, kicks out unexpectedly when it changes up around a corner etc.

Though for a purely street driven car I can see the appeal.

Yeah it certainly does make staying on peak torque for longer a lot easier. I guess I just always found it difficult to flog through the hills/circuit with an auto, compression lock when shifting down, kicks out unexpectedly when it changes up around a corner etc.

Though for a purely street driven car I can see the appeal.

it would only do that with a standard torque converter, woudn't happen with a modified larger one, and they are usually fully manualised anyway when built up, no drive at all

But yeh they have no engine braking, thats the big one, manuals will always be better in hills or on track

cheers

darren

  • 9 months later...

ok so after reading this thread from the start I'm starting to get a better idea of the auto hoodoovoodoo people talk of, nevertheless I'm still going to be persistant and stick by the auto mob :).

ok, so the car is currently a natro 25 with an re5ro1a box but that can pretty much be ignored as it aparently those boxes are rubish.

so the end goal for the car will be high 200rwkw mark. and my orginal plan was to find an re4r01a box and use it. so the questions are:

will a simple shift kit (stage 2) handel this power

what sized stall is recomended (car is basically a weekend warrior so was tossing up between the 2800 and the 3500 stall converter, pros cons?)

what ecu is best suited or if it becomes fully manulised does this get rid of the problem this threads quite old so unsure on what has been developed since then.

as i live in se Queensland are there a reputable auto store i can simply drop the box at tell them what id like and have the work carried out.

finally the worst part, how much is this all going to cost me :) (roughly)

*car is a series 1 r33.

Thanks Nick

ok so after reading this thread from the start I'm starting to get a better idea of the auto hoodoovoodoo people talk of, nevertheless I'm still going to be persistant and stick by the auto mob :).

ok, so the car is currently a natro 25 with an re5ro1a box but that can pretty much be ignored as it aparently those boxes are rubish.

so the end goal for the car will be high 200rwkw mark. and my orginal plan was to find an re4r01a box and use it. so the questions are:

will a simple shift kit (stage 2) handel this power

what sized stall is recomended (car is basically a weekend warrior so was tossing up between the 2800 and the 3500 stall converter, pros cons?)

what ecu is best suited or if it becomes fully manulised does this get rid of the problem this threads quite old so unsure on what has been developed since then.

as i live in se Queensland are there a reputable auto store i can simply drop the box at tell them what id like and have the work carried out.

finally the worst part, how much is this all going to cost me :) (roughly)

*car is a series 1 r33.

Thanks Nick

I have an RE5, why is it inferior?

I had an auto in mine, 260rwkw it was slipping bad, did 2000 kms on street and it went to auto heaven. I loved the auto but I do like the manual heaps more. The jatco arent a strong box iv been told and cost a lot to get built up. I was going to do a c4 auto fully manualised with transbrake and 4k stally but was going to cost 5k plus stally at another 1k.

  • 4 weeks later...

I got a R34 GTT with following mods

Inter Cooler

HKS Electronic booster

Pod Filter

3 inch HKS exhaust

Everything else is stock and I get on dyno for 167 kw on 12psi .

I am planning on upgrading turbo, fuel system etc to get around 350kw .. has anyone done it before.

Edited by Neo R34 GT-T

I got a R34 GTT with following mods

Inter Cooler

HKS Electronic booster

Pod Filter

3 inch HKS exhaust

Everything else is stock and I get on dyno for 167 kw on 12psi .

I am planning on upgrading turbo, fuel system etc to get around 350kw .. has anyone done it before.

Plenty of people have done it before - read the RB25 turbo upgrade thread above. 300kw is easy... the next 50 will take a bit more doing. Allegedly the auto can be rebuilt to handle that sort of power (e.g. MV Autos in Blackwood Adelaide - poss others) but I would be going manual with that sort of power.
Plenty of people have done it before - read the RB25 turbo upgrade thread above. 300kw is easy... the next 50 will take a bit more doing. Allegedly the auto can be rebuilt to handle that sort of power (e.g. MV Autos in Blackwood Adelaide - poss others) but I would be going manual with that sort of power.

+1, my auto at 140k old well maintained, lasted 2000kms of easy driving with the odd leadfoot appeal shat itself with 260kw

  • 1 month later...

so do we have a general consensus that the emanage blue/ultimate is sufficient to tune the auto? (this is the biggest problem that i have , not many want to tune an auto)

other then fluid change , shift kit and trans cooler what else would I need for my auto to handle 220rwkw all day every day reliably?

Emanage ultimate would be fine if you can find a tuner that is willing to tune it. With those mods you should be fine for 250kw in a daily.

250??? wow, i was told by paden at unique automotive that the auto box will struggle to handle 230rwkw all day every day reliably..... but looking through this thread , that certainly seems feasible once mods for the tranny are done

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...