Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats the face for :kiss:

Cause you're confusing! one minute you say you were driving after the accident.. no shakes nothing.. the next that you're scared and want a beemer.. then that you want a 350kw skyline!

Is that directed at me?!?!?! :)

nope.. i'd say its directed at the driver!

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Cause you're confusing! one minute you say you were driving after the accident.. no shakes nothing.. the next that you're scared and want a beemer.. then that you want a 350kw skyline!

Well i was joking with the skyline and after the accident we werent shaking and after we got out of hospital my mate did drive us home in my r32 gtr.

man you guys are soooooo lucky......

guess the driver wasn't though and certainly wont be after everyone reads all of this.....

glad you crawled away with just a few minor injuries.....

seen much worse from less..............

DAm!!! i have been steadly saving up for this car ...even sold my GTR and this has happened.... Good luck with the whole crashing process. Its a slow tedius harsh lesson to lean the hard way.

RIP Morgz Godzilla .... Another one down !

Well i was joking with the skyline and after the accident we werent shaking and after we got out of hospital my mate did drive us home in my r32 gtr.

FOR EVERYBODYS INFORMATION THE ASIAN BLOKE THAT WAS DRIVING THE CAR WAS A COMPLETE MORON AND SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT TWICE BEFORE DRIVING THAT FAST ON A NOTORIOUSLY WINDY ROAD!!!! AND HIS SISTER DROVE ALL HIS MATES HOME... JUST WANT TO CLEAR UP HIS STORY. HIS MATES WERE STILL A BIT SHAKEN FROM THE ACCIDENT, HIS MUM ABSOLUTELY SHIT HERSELF (AND WHOS MUM WOULDNT) SO THATS WHY HIS SISTER DROVE THEM HOME....AND AS FOR BUYING ANOTHER CAR I THINK THAT YOU SHOULD BUY YOURSELF SOMETHING SAFER, A VOLVO MAYBE... TAKES ALOT TO OVER TURN THAT!!!!!

FOR EVERYBODYS INFORMATION THE ASIAN BLOKE THAT WAS DRIVING THE CAR WAS A COMPLETE MORON AND SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT TWICE BEFORE DRIVING THAT FAST ON A NOTORIOUSLY WINDY ROAD!!!! AND HIS SISTER DROVE ALL HIS MATES HOME... JUST WANT TO CLEAR UP HIS STORY. HIS MATES WERE STILL A BIT SHAKEN FROM THE ACCIDENT, HIS MUM ABSOLUTELY SHIT HERSELF (AND WHOS MUM WOULDNT) SO THATS WHY HIS SISTER DROVE THEM HOME....AND AS FOR BUYING ANOTHER CAR I THINK THAT YOU SHOULD BUY YOURSELF SOMETHING SAFER, A VOLVO MAYBE... TAKES ALOT TO OVER TURN THAT!!!!!

dude... you do realise grkgtr was not the one driving the car.. right?

are you the drivers friend?! were you in the car?! i thought he had potential drivers in the car, not mates?

Lol.. I drive through that area and stretch of road once, sometimes three or more times a day.

And going 140 through there is...possible if you have all the lanes to yourself.. but, it's not like that haha what a stupid fool.. 140... He must have missed the big red sign that said REDUCE SPEED.

Atleast they're all ok, and no kids got hurt. When I actually think about it.. I must have missed this accident by a few minutes.. I was driving through there yesterday just 15 mins before the poster said it happened. Probably best I wasn't around.. more reason for him to show off..

EDIT: it looks like he actually came from Double Bay back streets and fired up the little hill towards where you merge. There's a little round about there.. maybe he tried to gun it out of the roundabout.. lost it.. gave it more... and i dunno...

dude... you do realise grkgtr was not the one driving the car.. right?

are you the drivers friend?! were you in the car?! i thought he had potential drivers in the car, not mates?

Yep i know for sure that he wasnt driving the car.... as i said the moronated asian bloke was driving, and mastered the art of crashing a car..... with maximum damage! Im GRKGTR's sister. he only had 1 potential buyer in the car not three, my brother was the potential buyer, his mates came with him because he couldnt drive as he has lost his license. lucky for him his mates were there to drag him out of the car.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...