Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my fastest for the night was

ET - 12.285

Terminal - 111.94mph

Reaction - 0.690

60' - 2.034

was a little higher boost than my street setting (ran it at 1.1bar)

I considered it a win for the night as it was a good virgin run for the R and I didn't break anything!

With some quick times posted and I think we surprised some of the trev's. Good turn out and variety of cars... Paul really put the "turn" in "turn out"... tonight I pray that someone has that on film!

  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top work Paul, 125mph is massive, thats making some huge power.

My first run in the new R, kept the AVC-R switched off (0.9bar) and still ran 110mph.

Unfortunately the long first gear ratio of the OS cross set box combined with the 2835's means that even a limiter launch bogs down. 2.1 was my best 60' of the night.

Will be good to see what it runs when it's tuned and boosted next thursday.

Edited by Brockaz

i think dan may have got paul's spin on vid, but im not sure

apparently a 125mph is good enough for a 10 second pass - but he just couldn't get the power down. Watching him race and he was spinning it still on half track - but one 'advantage' of the power meant that he did some awesome burnouts

a few of you guys did some limiter bashing burnouts - sounded and looked good :P

AND michael ended up running with his hazards on, and lost to paul in the same race :P

Yes, after the first pass on slicks and a close call with the wall I was relagated to using street tyres, which didn't make for any fast times, but still a great night.

If someone has footage of the spin then please post it up :)

In a total of 4 passes I spun, shredded my wheel nuts, and blew off my intercooler hose. But it could have been much worse. At least I gave the commentators something to chat about :kiss:

mitchy what happened to your car??

only did one run eyy then took off and saw some smoke coming form the rear... turbine eyy???

What did happen to his car?? I was racing him at the time. Just as i pasted the line I looked in my review mirror to see a heap of smoke from his car... Hope its nothing to bad.

lol my mate went down in his blue 99 wrx ended up getting 13.1 , he also mentioned he saw a "FU**IN MAD" skyline that got shit times cos of lack of traction and he slide out aswell lol,,

also said he saw a white skyline with smoke coming out the back???

This kinda sums up my night :laugh:

$1400 for PFC and Boost Controller

$600 for fitting and tune

$1000 new clutch

$40 Entry to the drags

Gaining 40rwHP more than before on same dyno

Yet only running .2 seconds quicker over the quarter with slower MPH than before.

PRICELESS :happy:

(FTR it ran a 12.4)

Edited by PSI_GTSII

well only managed the one run due to stoopid gearshaft issues which caused a join with team breakdown along with paully and mitchy

then drove home playing find the gear 1st and 4th mostly but it was still a good night

top turnout for the club with some very respectable times as well hope everyone enjoyed themselves

haha hazards look siic

why did u do that :happy: ??

because Strich9 (kym) said that if he ran with them on again, he would bitch slap him

so michael did, but no slap :laugh:

yeah, heard about that gavin

i was walking past when i heard ya go 'finally, got first gear' then you took off

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...