Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Complete:

Trader Ratings;

  • Fixed adding a comment

  • Fixed member search

  • Fixed multiple variables (IPB 2.2 uses new variable names)

  • Added link to Trader Rating from Members list/search results

  • Fixed Type

  • Added URL input (not yet output)

Email notifications;

  • Fixed paths to sendmail

  • Added FROM field in the headers

Fixed attachments

Fix member group icons

Finished Sphinx search integration

Converted session table to HEAP engine

Installed Memcache to look after the query caching

Fix banners

ToDo:

Add URL output to trader comments

Add Trader details to members profile

Many server optimizations

Fix members' hosted webpages!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

umm either email notifications aren't working or all subscriptions have been lost again (like the upgrade before last)

Hope everything else is going OK with the move. And the baby lol.

Thanks Duncan. :)

Email notification will be the death of me. :rant:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trader ratings have a coupe of small probs. when I'm looking at my own, I click on "left for others" i get an error. so I can't see who I have or haven't left ratings for. well not easily.

but it's good to have them back, so I ain't complaining! :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say the speed of the new forum is very impressive - should have shifted long ago :domokun: There is nothing like a well tuned US server for reliability..

Do you hand tune the database settings? what db is it running?

I'm just working with a 1million record database at the moment, so just curious, as I'm working on some optimisation myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Predator, I am so happy you said that, I have been so nervous about the performance. It has hardly been tweaked at all so far, just some small MySQL caching changes. I have a bunch more to do over the weekend which will probably help considerably (including a new search engine that will speed searches up by at least 10x).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems nice and snappy so far..

I guess a lot of it comes down to the efficiency of IPB coding more than anything else - but I assume they have done it as intelligently as possible on that side.

I've found that tweaking a few of the mysql settings can do wonders, especially on larger databases (like I assume the message table on here)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it doesnt take much to make MySQL much quicker.

IPB still needs some work. For eg, when you go to page 2 of a 100 page topic, it will select ALL posts then find the posts for that topic and THEN order them and THEN display the ones for page 2... hence why, at this stage, the whoretown threads kill the system.

IPB 2.3 is being released soon with heaps of performance upgrades... should be much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it doesnt take much to make MySQL much quicker.

IPB still needs some work. For eg, when you go to page 2 of a 100 page topic, it will select ALL posts then find the posts for that topic and THEN order them and THEN display the ones for page 2... hence why, at this stage, the whoretown threads kill the system.

IPB 2.3 is being released soon with heaps of performance upgrades... should be much better.

well i can fix that problem. :( time for a little whore thread renewal perhaps? out with the old, in with the new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm

just noticed that my time is out by about 6 minutes

my laptop is accurate internet time,

eg now it is 2:46

but the board reckons its 2:40

gets confusing when posting, cause i look at the time to find out when they posted (specially if its a quick whore reply)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey Christian, this isnt to do with the new server, but i didnt want to start a new topic :nyaanyaa:

whenever I go to do anything, it loads up the page to about 80% and then freezes for about 20secs before loading fully. It's not a major thing but it's like I'm back on dial up LOL

It's only been happening for the last month or so. I use Safari but also tried Firefox and it was exactly the same.

It's just this site... every other site/forum I go to is fine :pwned:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...