Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, im having a headache trying to pick which turbo i want!!!, i want bucketloads of response and torque for the street, and thats basically it, i wont be draggin the car much, and am aiming for a 12sec pass - which turbo is better suited for me?, i dnt think ill go over 250rwkw as a rough goal (+/- a little either way)....

also, are s15 injectors all good if my goal is 250rwkw max?, i heard they can be picked up brand new from nissan for cheap?.....

Im still keen on the gt2535, dnno why - maybe cause i still think they have more response than the gt-rs?.....which is what im going for......only problem is theyre 2nd hand only now - not really a biggie though,someone is selling one here in nz for quite a bargain.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/
Share on other sites

i think it was paulr33 that posted this on sau in a 'kkr' thread a while ago. unsure of how accurate it is, but from peoples accounts/rb25 turbo dyno comparison thread, seems fairly true. obviously the results are going to vary alot depending on supporting mods/tune, but should give you a rough idea of response times.

and s15 jdm spec 440cc injectors will be fine for 250rwkw

rb25_turbo_compare.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3498652
Share on other sites

you might want to have a look at the compressor maps for the different turbos first.... Known problem with he GTRS is surge at low rpm... the bugger spools so quickly that you'll hit the surge limit early and this will manifest itself in the turbo surging at low rpm.... more annoying that anything else... Again, all depends on what you're looking for - all out whack, driveability or response at low rpm. Consider a 2835 for a RB25 instead :P good for 400+ with 1.2 - 1.4 bar of boost.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3498666
Share on other sites

HKS GT-RS meets his goal, responsive, they don't surge (although they are a close thing on paper), come on earlier than the GCG in back to back testing and will reach 250rwkw and a little more with cams.

easy decision IMO.

Edited by wolverine
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3498707
Share on other sites

you might want to have a look at the compressor maps for the different turbos first.... Known problem with he GTRS is surge at low rpm... the bugger spools so quickly that you'll hit the surge limit early and this will manifest itself in the turbo surging at low rpm.... more annoying that anything else... Again, all depends on what you're looking for - all out whack, driveability or response at low rpm. Consider a 2835 for a RB25 instead :D good for 400+ with 1.2 - 1.4 bar of boost.

Do you really know what you're talking about? ;)

Regarding the 2835, i hope you're talking flywheel horsepower as there is no way you'll make 400kw, let alone more.

I've had the HKS GTRS on my car and it never surged. I personally think the GTRS is the best compromise between power, lag/response and street drivablity. I made 270rwkw; with cams and head porting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3498711
Share on other sites

If you buy the HKS version of the GT-RS (GT2871R 52T) with the port shrouded compressor cover (meaning the RB 6 variant) it shouldn't surge . If you get the SR version and put either the T3 flanged housing from HKS or std RB20/25 on it then yes I expect it would get compressor surge .

Truthfully the hardest bit to find is the HKS T3 flanged exhaust housing , once you have that then any GT28BB turbo with the same turbine can be bolted up . If your talking about the price of a new GT-RS vs a bargin GT2535 then I'd take the 2535 . That way you get the good exhaust housing , can play with the 2535 cartridge and put a new GT2871R 52T in it if its not to your liking . The better turbo suppliers/machinists can port shroud a T04B comp cover easily enough .

Your call .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3498713
Share on other sites

thanks for all your help, the main plus side with the gt-rs would be, id buy it brand new,m and itll come with everything needed to bolt right up(as ill buy hte kit), i was wondering what response is like in the gt-rs as opposed to the 2535???, i jst want a really good responsive street car...that can pull 12's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3499123
Share on other sites

Seeing as the 2535 isn't made anymore and just about every item you'll find will be 2nd hand...i'd go the GT-RS...you will hit your power goals with that turbo...its also newer technology compared to the "dinosaur" 2535...that said...i run a 2535 on my rb20 and i think its a great unit...can't imagine how much better a gt-rs will be...on a rb25 especially...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3499475
Share on other sites

I had a 2535 and have driven Al's GTRS (RB25) and the 2535 is a little more responsive (not much) but the GTRS has more top end..

It is just that you would be able to find a 2535 cheaper than a GTRS. So if money isnt a problem id be going the GTRS, if money is an option, then got a second hand 2535

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3500168
Share on other sites

Get some 2nd hand s15 injectors and you should be OK

HKS GT2535 is fine for about 250rwkws, maybe a tad less.

I have both of the above on 246 but the clutch was slipping a tad so maybe enough to get the 250.

(Results in the RB25 thread)

2535 is 2nd hand like you said.

Check the Yahoo Auctions for a decent unit as they're getting scarce

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3502822
Share on other sites

I've got a GTRS and the response is awesome and it isn't even tuned yet, comes on pretty much like a standard turbo. Personally i reckon anything smaller is a waste, fair enough it might come on 200rpm sooner, but really who cares about such a small amount of lag. Go either a GTRS or a 2835 if you want some more power, if you go smaller i reckon you will regret not going something bigger with a bit more potential. Remeber, once you get used to the power, you always want more. ALWAYS!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195310-gt2535-vs-gtrs/#findComment-3502850
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...