Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The only person who knows the actual time before the program airs is the Stig and TREG & Supraman fom GTR.co.uk, and the studio Audience - and he doesn't know how to edit wiki, so its all bullshit atm...

Fixed it for you...

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/99575-to...html#post940994

Edit: Heres the photos they took from the Studio audience:

Well done to everyone so far whos put something in for the charity!!

You have been pm'd with the Topgear track results!!

Some pics as the other thread was closed!!

IMG_0844.jpg

IMG_0843.jpg

IMG_0841.jpg

IMG_0832.jpg

Edited by MintR33

Apparently someone on the corvette forum said that the GTR came third on the top gear track!! He was completely blown away after he found out it's time. Whoever doubt that it will never make top ten should hang their head in shame.

Edited by skyline_man

thing is, the ascari is barely what ud call a road car, its not legal in a lot of countries, the only reason it was accepted as a legal road car was because it can be setup for the road, but the time was set as a non-road legal car. the CCX was not standard, it was modified, the enzo and pagani are just nuts and the MC12 is just an enzo with a different shell, so for the GTR to be up there is amazing.

wow man it does have hard competition, but i have fair in the almighty GTR! :(;):)

That's until all these car manufactures realize that they are getting there arses kicked by GTR 35 and they will certainly come up with a more powerful version of there own ! :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

Regards Mario

Edited by PolishDoc
haha... I said earlier in this thread that the car would come in the top 5. So who's eating their Words... *cough* snowman *cough*.

It wasn't Top 5, it did 1:19.7

1 1:17.3 – Ascari A10

2 1:17.6 – Koenigsegg CCX (with "Top Gear Spoiler")

3 1:18.4 – Pagani Zonda F

4 1:18.9 – Maserati MC12

5 1:19.0 – Ferrari Enzo

6 1:19.5 – Ariel Atom 2 300

7 1.19.7 - Nissan GTR

8 1:19.7 – Ferrari 430 Scuderia

9 1:19.8 – Porsche Carrera GT

10 1:19.8 – Lamborghini Murciélago LP640

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...