Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I guess the パン, which could mean "pan" or "bread", was meant to be パンプ "pump"? otherwise it didn't make sense at all, since there's no such thing as water pan- so seems like another typo there 

The (11A) does refer to the "combustion" component of the car - the component where the "plenum" is fitted & where it directly interacts

the direct translation of "ニスモRスペックインターナルコンポーネンツ (スベックシート11A参照)" is "nismo R spec internal compenents (refer to spec sheet 11A)"

インターナル= internal, not combustion

have you got a scanned copy of the 11A?

also it mentioned steel turbo impellers- "ターボチャージャーメタルインテーク&エグゾストインペラーズ" directly prounces "turbo charger metal intake & exhaust impellers" in English

In addition to the エグゾスト typo, I've never seen Japs use the word impeller (インペラー) to refer to turbine, the most commonly used term is ホイール which is just wheels. インペラー referrs to fans attached at the end of pumps, like liquid pumps or power generators (alternators)

besides they don't use plural for 外来語 (foreign loan words), so インペラー would be better sense thanインペラーズ ("ズ", pronounced "zu") even though you're referring to both intake and exhaust wheels.

another one is アッセンブリー, which stands for assembly. in the automotive industry they use ASSY or アッシー. use of the word アッセンブリー makes sense but just not something that you'd normally see on a Japanese automotive catalogue.

anyway, there's no definite right or wrong in any language, but here are just some differences I've picked out from what natives would normally use, which is quite a fair bit from just over half a page. If anything it looks like an English native Japanese beginner wrote this.

cheers

Edited by chiksluvit

the direct translation of "ニスモRスペックインターナルコンポーネンツ (スベックシート11A参照)" is "nismo R spec internal compenents (refer to spec sheet 11A)"

have you got a scanned copy of the 11A?

... hi there ... :) ...

... i have 2 original documents of: 11A ... might also have part copies of it that were emailed as j.pegs ...

... everything is in Japan at the moment ... the car but no documents is being considered for the inclusion in a book ... i have no copyright over any document they are in fact all the property of The Nissan Motor Company Japan.

... it wasnt clear to me why you asked the question ... i hope my answer has been some help :)

... cheers malcolm :)

I guess the パン, which could mean "pan" or "bread", was meant to be パンプ "pump"? otherwise it didn't make sense at all, since there's no such thing as water pan- so seems like another typo there 

the direct translation of "ニスモRスペックインターナルコンポーネンツ (スベックシート11A参照)" is "nismo R spec internal compenents (refer to spec sheet 11A)"

インターナル= internal, not combustion

have you got a scanned copy of the 11A?

also it mentioned steel turbo impellers- "ターボチャージャーメタルインテーク&エグゾストインペラーズ" directly prounces "turbo charger metal intake & exhaust impellers" in English

In addition to the エグゾスト typo, I've never seen Japs use the word impeller (インペラー) to refer to turbine, the most commonly used term is ホイール which is just wheels. インペラー referrs to fans attached at the end of pumps, like liquid pumps or power generators (alternators)

besides they don't use plural for 外来語 (foreign loan words), so インペラー would be better sense thanインペラーズ ("ズ", pronounced "zu") even though you're referring to both intake and exhaust wheels.

another one is アッセンブリー, which stands for assembly. in the automotive industry they use ASSY or アッシー. use of the word アッセンブリー makes sense but just not something that you'd normally see on a Japanese automotive catalogue.

anyway, there's no definite right or wrong in any language, but here are just some differences I've picked out from what natives would normally use, which is quite a fair bit from just over half a page. If anything it looks like an English native Japanese beginner wrote this.

cheers

... hi there :) ...

... theres nothing to indicate that this document originated from NISMO ... its a really incomplete list of the cars details & is only printed on A4 card & stored loose in the folder ... it isnt in any way part of a catalogue ... you are probably right ... maybe a french guy did it from Renault when the car was being prepared to re enter the market place & they wanted a list of what was on it ? ... :) ...

... it doesnt really matter anyway ... as long as whoever did it noted what they saw ... half japanese/english ... russian/eskimo ... would be fine ... :) ...

... i really appreciate all the time you spent working all that out ... that is very kind of you - thankyou ... :) ...

... cheers malcolm :)

  • 1 year later...

Wow..never knew this car had a thread..its been on my desktop for over a year...Love it..:thumbsup:

... interesting !? ... where did you first see it if you didnt see it in the thread ? ... i havnt driven it for a while it did less than 100klms between regos last year ... am looking forward to getting it off the stands & out of lock up sometime soon ... cheers malcolm :)

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

It most likely was. It has 2500r decal written on the windshield instead of the OmoriFactory.

Still had that distinct paint colour though.

ha yes that was me in lane cove ! yes the omori factory decal across the front screen now sais 2500R yes the car is a gtst that was earmarked for some development work - yes i still own it - the paint is nissan KH2 that has been re clear coated - cheers malcolm :)

all good nick ... just checking out whose saying what about my car ... I find it all so amusing that people have certain opinions about something they know absolutely nothing about ... be great to catch up ... buzz or text me if you like 0414922209 be great to touch base ... mal :) ...

OMG, you're still alive? How are you dude?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know it's an entirely different engine, but I noticed practically 0 difference removing or adding 2x 3in (5inch body) 400cell cats (one in each bank) with regards to sound. So changing the cat to change drone I suspect will have very very, very, very, very, very very minimal impact.
    • 200 cell cat will probably help. Do you have room to tee off a Helmholtz resonator anywhere along the exhaust? These can do wonders for drones, with a little experimentation with regards to length.
    • The car revs up through the gears much better/faster now, and fuel consumption doesn't really seem to have be affected either on a Hwy cruise, which wasn't expected  The FAB9 intake manifold has been problematic sourcing though, I've contacted Plasmaman to ask about their intake, which you can get different runner lengths spec'd, and, their different options for throttle bodies  The only real physical drawback with the Plasmaman intake is how to connect it to my current OEM style airbox, as FAB9 make a OEM style back half of the airbox to suit the larger diameter throttle body, and all that is required is a 30°bend silicone pipe to mate the throttle body to the airbox Car also goes in for some exhaust work in a week or so to fit the biggest resonator they can fit clearance wise in the front pipe to help remove some of the drone, there isn't alot of realestate under there, a rough guesstimation is it will only be about 3-400mm long and maybe 90-100mm diameter, and with a 60mm exhaust that doesn't leave alot of space for the internal volume of the resonator to do its thing I'm thinking I may need to bin the "high flow" 100 cell cat for something a bit more substantial, yeah, and restrictive, like a 200-400 cell, to help, but, I have ample room for a really large bodied cat to replace the current one which has around a 4" diameter body I may look around in the recycling bins and see if I can find a massive newish cat that was "replaced" with some new full exhaust system that the local exhaust shop in Western Sydney is doing
    • Hahah look at that smile 😂 Just like those ones on IG where they compare the husband in family photos vs husband going fishing lol. I don't think I'll participate this time, clutch isn't in and also the last time I went there were too many numpties on the cruise sessions. Nearly caused a few accidents holding up people and a few guys initiating massive kerb to kerb drifts with heaps of cars right behind them. Not to mention, there were guys on the track session using it as a power cruise session.
×
×
  • Create New...