Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Just thought I might share my video with ya'll. Went for a drive this morning (nice and cold), got up to about 200km/h.

Have alot of traction issues in 1st and 2nd gear, sometimes even third if you smash the gears in.

What do you guys think, not bad acceleration?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217630-hks-gt2835-pro-s-turbo-2723-rwkw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nice man, I assume that was all done on a closed runway :cheers:

270 odd kw is my eventual power aim, if you don't mind me asking how much was the 2835 and what other mods do you have? How much boost you running? I was originally wanting a GT-RS but from everything I have seen it will struggle to net 270+ without cams or excessive boost.

Nice man, I assume that was all done on a closed runway :cheers:

270 odd kw is my eventual power aim, if you don't mind me asking how much was the 2835 and what other mods do you have? How much boost you running? I was originally wanting a GT-RS but from everything I have seen it will struggle to net 270+ without cams or excessive boost.

Hey mate, don't mind you asking at all.

The turbo was about $3,250 delivered to Canberra, Australia. I paid a little more as I wanted to pay with paypal (ALWAYS PAY WITH PAYPAL when buying things from overseas!!!.

Running about 17-18PSI (It fluctuates depending on the weather)

I got the normal mods; 555cc Nismo Injectors, Bocsh 040 fuel pump, GReddy front mount, Splitfire coilpacks, straight through exhaust, power FC, Cold air intake with heat shield, and the HKS GT2835 turbo with the HKS split dump pipe.

The turbo is ALOT laggier than stock, but yes MUCH MUCH tougher!

Personally, I don't think its worth it compared to the GT-RS, if I had a second chance, I would've gone for the GT-RS, purely because of the money factor. But then again, you do get the split dump with the 2835 turbo kit.....

Nonetheless, both are great turbos!

Cheers

I have 314rwkw and its not that much quciker than what you have recorded, well done.

haha, yeah, you were on a private runway

Cheers mate.

Yeah, ofcourse I was on a closed runway! :cheers:

Mafia, when you achieved your 12.4 1/4 mile time, what was your 0-60 time? I thought with 314rwkw you should be in the VERY low 12's, maybe even break into the high 11s?

Edited by Turbz RB-25

hey mate, the power was down a lot when I ran that time, as I just installed a new fuel pump and the AFR's were at 10:1 lol.

Not sure what it runs now with the new power, as the track is not finished. It was destroyed in the floods we had recently.

Be interestingf you could run a wheel speed sensor off a front wheel that way the loss of traction doesnt mess with your speedo.

Looks grunty, only, why post footage of you doing crazy speeds in a public place like youtube then link it on a public forum ;)

Because it was done on private property and I would like to see you or the police prove otherwise :happy:

Perhaps he was indicating to other cars he was entering pits?

Look we know he did it on a public road but the point is he filmed ONLY the instrument cluster and at no point did he say it was done on a public road. Innocent until proven guilty and there is nothing conclusive for the cops to go on. Lets just apreciate the video for what it is, which is someone with a new turbo showing us what its like :happy:

Thats interesting... The 2835 is usually considered to be a relatively lag free turbo...

I'm not saying that the turbo is a lag monster, but compared to the stock turbo (especially when I first got in the car after the dyno tune), it was sooooo much laggier than the stock turbo... But when it hits, it's nothing but smiles! :nyaanyaa:

Thanks for all the comments guys.

VERY nice turbo (HKS GT2835 Pro S) indeed.

cheers

I'm not saying that the turbo is a lag monster, but compared to the stock turbo (especially when I first got in the car after the dyno tune), it was sooooo much laggier than the stock turbo... But when it hits, it's nothing but smiles! :nyaanyaa:

Thanks for all the comments guys.

VERY nice turbo (HKS GT2835 Pro S) indeed.

Very nice video :( Was interesting to observe, I can't tell watching it if my turbo (.82a/r GT3076R) is any laggier - nothing obvious thats for sure . Something else which is interesting is your car is definitely a bit quicker than mine, I have made very similar power number but on a hub dyno so all it does is confirms what every already knows - hub dynos read a bit higher haha. When I sort a couple of things out I am tempted to try a 17-18psi tune and have a blat at the local race track (I actually have one 15mins drive from my house!! :( ) and see what mine does the rolling to 200k thing like.

Should be good for some rapid 1/4 mile times like that, especially with some sticky tires.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...