Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If your running .98's on cruise and .78's on WOT thats not that much of a difference to PULP, in AFR terms he is running about 11.466 on WOT, some people like to tune their cars to that with PULP. (my 363rwkw tune was at 11.1 afr)

and thats about 14.4 afr on cruise.... Thats not a huge difference at all, and would bring major benifits to fuel economy.

This sounds interesting... should go for a 20 or 30 % mix :P could we mix the stuff ourselfs?

he said 9.8 and 7.8 as in 9.8:1 not .98 lambda. that is a big difference from conventional fuels.

got any info and results and mix's they are running?

Here's a quote from a well known local tuner in reference to E85 "I love using alcohol on boosted applications. You can crank out an additional 10-14 more degrees of timing, and at an average of 7-10 rwhp per degree of timing, it adds up fast.". From what I've heard around here adding 1 gallon of E85 to a tank of 93 pump gas gets you somewhere around 95 or 96 octane and can help lean out a rich tune. I would imagine that's good for a degree or two. Most of the guys doing around here are either 03 Corbras or LSx F-bodies with superchargers, turbos, or big nitrous setups.

Edited by jdmser

Personally for the everyday driver I wouldnt go filling my car with a whole tank of the stuff, when they ran the report on it (in NSW) there was some old blokes filling his EB falcon saying "its great!" I'd like to see how long they really do last (ie rubber seals, hoses and so on) but as mentioned above, 1/4 of a tank in with the normal stuff (92 or 95) and good tune I think it would be worth-while.

In terms of clearing land (deforestation), the following erosion, intensive water use ect. ethanol is not the environmetal solution to burning petroleum...so dont think its helping the environment at all...

Also no-one has mentioned the calorfic value of E85 vs petrol.

he said 9.8 and 7.8 as in 9.8:1 not .98 lambda. that is a big difference from conventional fuels.

yeh converting to afr can get confusing, lambda is the best way to tune i guess, from what i've read in the US .8 lambda is around the money.

dont use it without tuneing for it, it burns very lean, it's alot lighter fuel, if you have WOT tuned to 12.1 it will most likely lean out to 14-16.1,

closed loop can handle it but you wouldnt want to gas it!

Is a little harder to start when cold, trying different cranking duty atm to see if that helps, when warm it's fine, runs smoother i think, feels crisp to drive, definately more torque down low, can use less throttle opening, i guess that helps reduce the fuel usage, offset the extra its burning.

I havn't pushed the timeing yet, it just wont knock and i dont wanna go too far, will need to dyno it to find max torque!

youtube has a few good vids on this stuff, try google "e85 tuneing", people useing E85 cant say enough good about it, i wonder how many dooms-dayers are confuseing it with methanol!

I reserve judgement on the damage done to this rock and its atmosphere by tapping and burning petroleum fuels .

Also it's about time we stopped being walked all over by the oil producing countries a long way away across the worlds shipping lanes . Make it here , sell it here , burn it here . As for lube oils any excuse to push synthetic products is all good IMO .

I think that getting used to alcohols different AFR numbers may take a bit of time just like anything we're unaccustom to .

I really like the sound of the higher ethanol blends detonation resistance , usually it's difficult to run best mean torque timing because of detonation . Maybe finally we could run higher static CR's on forced induced engines and fire the mixture when the pressure wave will do the most good torque wise .

One would think that if ethanol has a lower boiling point than petrol it would have a better cooling action as it turns from a mist to a gas in the inlet tract .

Does anyone know much about the conversion kits that allow production engines to burn E85 or similar properly ?

Cheers , A .

so 15% can change it that much ??? I guess that would have to be something i would have to test for myself as i cannot see how it would change that much with just a 15% mix.

he said 9.8 and 7.8 as in 9.8:1 not .98 lambda. that is a big difference from conventional fuels.
Ah actually Nismoid yes it is , in Sydney I believe its at a United servo on Victoria rd - maybe Ultimo ?

I think part of what's brought it on is that Saab ? and one other mobs is starting to sell cars that can run it so they need fodder for them .

Anyway they've decided to sell it through one location I think in Syd/Melb/Adelaide to gauge the publics reaction to it .

It was in the media last week with a bit of fan fare because some people are prepared to risk engine "issues" to pay 40c less a litre than the usual cheapest grade "power kerosene" .

Ah well there ya go :/

I remember a mate talking about it the other day and i dont think Vic is ready yet? But its not too far away or something :P

Bring on the dyno queens..........

The biggest negative is you have to tune for it, that would likely mean that you can no longer use PULP, or if you do then very very cautiously [but with over 5 degree's and maybe much larger I'd say that its a big negatory].

So you would be limited to a few specialised servo's in Metro area's. If you wanted to use your car to go across country, you'd have no hope.....................but in the year 2525 who knows?

Ah actually Nismoid yes it is , in Sydney I believe its at a United servo on Victoria rd - maybe Ultimo ?

I think part of what's brought it on is that Saab ? and one other mobs is starting to sell cars that can run it so they need fodder for them .

Anyway they've decided to sell it through one location I think in Syd/Melb/Adelaide to gauge the publics reaction to it .

It was in the media last week with a bit of fan fare because some people are prepared to risk engine "issues" to pay 40c less a litre than the usual cheapest grade "power kerosene" .

Metho is a bit different and from memory it's full name is methyl alcohol .

Yes I realise more ethanol has to be burnt to get the same heat output as petroleum fuels but the other benefits I find most interesting .

Ethanol not being a carbon based fuel probably means almost none of the emission nazis nastys to complain about and I suppose not having carbon buildup in an engine is not a bad thing .

I guess you have to wonder if valve seats and valve stem/guides are going to suffer in any way .

Also alcohol not being a solvent may not have the same bore washing tendancy of over rich petrol fuel mixtures .

Rev head issues aside I don't think we have quite the same problems with food and sugar here in Australia thay they have in some less fortunate places .

My guess is that the sugar cane industry here would like the opportunity to be able to produce in volume that which can be made into ethanol alcohol . Possibly the wages earnt would help local economies here - create jobs etc etc .

Personally I think Aussies probably eat too much sugar but thats only my selfish 7-10 kg overweight point of view .

The stuff you breathe in sinn city is not good on a still day so less of that can't be bad .

A bit less reliance on imported crude oil/fuels could have some positive benefits on the world stage .

The thing to watch is the overall establishment and how they may choose to tax ethanol if it takes off . I'm cynical and its debatable whether they'd let slip the opprtunity to maintain fuel tax revenues .

If I get the chance later I'll ask on some of the American boards what they think of E85 , I seem to remember it being mentioned on one ov the Evo ones there .

Cheers A .

jst to clarify that ethanol is a carbon based fuel, a simple version with 2 units which still when combusted releases energy from the broken linking chain but because it is simple, it will produce less kilojoules per litre then 98oct etc.

CH-CH

ALL fuels produce carbon emissions

metho is ethanol but they add methanol to it to prevent it being taxed in the same class as drinkable alcohol (spirits etc)

methanol is toxic to humans, specifically to haemological and vascular system.

they found that aboriginals were buying methylated spirits at 10bux for 5litres as opposed to vodka etc at 30-50bux for 750mls

just like 100 octane shell v power racing, it's limited by it's availability.

So i won't use it for exactly the same reasons.

It could promise the earth, but it doesn't matter if i can't get the shit.

Now if there was a servo with a regular supply next to my house, wakefield park, oran park and eastern creek i reckon i'd give it a go :D

great fuel though, although we use more we have less dependance on the terrorist.

it is quite pure and will not contain the extra toxins that fossil fuel contain from crude oil therefore if we plant more trees and crops to make the fuel they will require the extra CO2 for photosynthesis = synthesis of sugar CHO removing the carbon and leaving only oxygen.

unfortunately we dont have enough space to grow enough crops to supply the whole auto industry but the good thing is we can probably get african crops imported for the fuel.

this is beneficial to keep african populations under control, similar to cancerous cells and parasites which continue to leech nutrients from its host the african population would explode if there was not food shortages, diseases like tuberculosis, HIV and other water/airborne pathogens to keep populations at homeostatic levels.

Bit arsh!!

I was talking to someone last night about burning ethanol and emissions and one thing we can't escape is the nitrogen in the air we breathe . High combustion temps tend to lead to NO or oxides of nitrogen emissions (don't confuse this with Nitrous Oxide or N20) and also Nitric Acid which I think is HN03 , not quite as corrosive as Sulphuric Acid but no far behind .

It's the free nitrogen in the atmosphere that's gonna cause problems with whatever we burn in our engines .

I'd still like to know how Weber Marelli managed to make (in theory) an engine management system that could supposedly run any ratio of petrol ethanol blend and not suffer any engine damage .

A .

Ah well I guess we're back to limiting combustion temperature to have a handle on the NO pumped out .

I wonder if some smart cookie can come up with some sort of catalyst or fuel additive to get around it .

Cheers A .

Be nice to have a fuel that doesn't know how to knock and is Dolphin friendly too .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...