Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

morgs posted this on another forum

I heard rumour about this 2 or 3 months ago hence I havent bought any 89 cars and discouraged people who were considering them

I just got a reply from DOTARS re the 15 year rule:

The Departments policy on 15 years old vehicle will be changing on 1 October 2003 all vehicles to qualify under this scheme must be 15 years old by month to qualify for import. In regards to any other changes to this scheme this section will not be privy to any changes until they are announced to the general public as the would be classed as cabinet in confidence.  

Sorry I can not be of any more assistance.

my laurel will have to wait a while the cefiro will do though

safer yes... but making the 32 cost viable to bring in is another thing

exactly.. thing is if you look at the pricing strucuture.. basically it doesn't make much sense to bring in older vehicles. With the increased price of compliance, why pay around $4k compliance on a R32, when its pretty much the same (if not less) to comply an R33.. The price of the car can be comparable, as the difference in between say a 32 and 33 Japan is only a few $k. When you remember most of the costs are in everything *other* than the car itself, by the time it comes into the country its evened out.

The only way it would make older cars more attractive is through the 15 year rule, but expect that to be totally overhauled soon (after the effect of the current month-month thing that comes in oct 03 has bedded down I'd say). The differences between getting a 15 year and, say a 10 year car on the road (as they are currently) don't even make too much sense to me

Me too in a way. For a lot of people trying to get their dream car at a price that seems "too good to be true". It could be a very long and nervous wait. Who is to say they don't change it halfway through next year either? There is no guarantee...

I'd say there would be a lot of very pissed off people out there.. but the only way to do something is start writing people!! Without "the powers that be" knowing peole are very unhappy with this, they'll just assume that what they're doing is fine and accepted...

IMPORTANT

We have received written confirmation today from DOTARS that their application of the 15 year rule will change on 1st October 2003 from a year only designation to a month and year designation. For example, this means that a February 1989 model would be eligible for import in March 2004 and a November 1989 model would be eligible for import in November 2004.

Most affected will be models such as MX-5's, MR-2's, Celsiors, 300ZX's and R32's as these were only made from June 1989 and onwards. Some RX-7's, Supras and other models made in early 1989 will obviously still be eligible for import in early 2004.

DOTARS have never applied the rule this way since 1992 when it was first introduced, however they have obviously decided to do so now to slow down the import of 1989 models in early 2004.

All we can do is to act on the best information available and to warn of the risks prior to purchase, which is always our approach for all customers, then to supply updates outlining any confirmed changes to the rules, which is the purpose of this e-mail. 1989 models will still be sent to the Mailing List, and as usual it is up to customers to determine the risk and timeframes for themselves and to make their own decision.

A phase in period and / or special exemptions for those that have already bought vehicles relying on the way that DOTARS have applied the rules for the last 11 years, would be an obvious, reasonable and responsible approach. However, at this time neither has been indicated by DOTARS and no further detail has been supplied other than the above information.

Specific queries should therefore not be addressed to us, but to DOTARS themselves at [email protected] or on 1800 815 272 if calling within Australia or 61 26274 7444 outside Australia. The website address is http://rvcs-prodweb.dot.gov.au/

Given that they are probably being inundated with similar questions at the moment, it is recommended to keep your questions short and to the point to allow for a quicker response.

Written applications and enquiries should be addressed to:

The Administrator of Vehicle Standards

Vehicle Safety Standards

GPO Box 594

CANBERRA ACT 2601

it seems official... i just got the e-mail from geoff @ pretigemotorsport

I think we should "COMPLAIN LOUDLY" I was wanting my r32 here in Jan! But to stem the flow of cars entering the country an cutting the prices of second hand aussie POS cars we are getting raped by the government again by the looks of things.

This is garbage its time the aussie car market had to compete with the world and stand on its own to feet. Instead the industry is in the pocket of all the people in that matter. We somehow need to be heard!

Same with the hooning laws in WA Grrrr

Bitching complete

Voicing up is definately the best option.

Yes, it looks like the rule will change, but the change hasn't been announced. It it likely that any changes will make allowance for puchases before the announcement date.

If there isn't allowance for previous purchases, then I like many of you will be in for a painful wait, but presedence would suggest purchases before the announcment date will be ok...

To be safe, we need to voice our concerns to DOTARS in the mean time to ensure they realise how many of us have purchased on the assumption that a law that has been constant for 11 years, doesn't change with only 2 months notice.

one proplem wit that thinking doug you wouldhave a leg to stand on if you ahd placed your import approval in b4 the legislation was written there is very little retrospective law in aus.

but you cant place your import approval untill the car is eligable.

also whats to stop the govt changing the rules so they only allow standard cars rather than modded one under the 15 year rule?

cheers

Yes, it looks like the rule will change, but the change hasn't been announced. It it likely that any changes will make allowance for puchases before the announcement date.

While it seems nice in theory.. it was not as if any official process at all to be honest when these cars were put in storage by certain importers. It was just like me buying any car in Japan and having it stored there.. it doesn't mean anything officially. Until somebody actually signs some sort of import requrest, its just a car sitting there.

Sure you might have transferred $$ for it, but likewise I could buy a 1999 Honda Civic in Japan like the ones sold here and it would be "mine"... but there is no way in hell i could ever import it.

I think there could be very little recourse to be honest... you just have to wait and just hope that they don't change everything around again before your car is elligible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...