Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Matt,

A Kaaz centre is definately on the cards and i will doing everything possible to straighten my wheels up (has a bit of camber because of the coilovers at the moment even after a wheel alignment). Yeah i think your right about traction in fourth, going to struggle no matter what i do in the first three gears me thinks (especially when the cool air comes).

Did you manage to get the 14th free for westys dyno day mate?

Lee

Mate, if I have traction issues in 3rd, with the A/C on full blast, on a 37-39'c day, running 275 MT Radials, about -0.3 rear camber, and with less grunt, you've got no chance ha-ha. Cool temp's are going to be interesting.

It's not looking all that good at the moment. How long have I got before they close the entries? Knowing my luck I won't be free... and 3 to 4 days out the schedule will change and I will be free!

Congrat's Hamish. Nice result! Nice and responsive too.

Mate, if I have traction issues in 3rd, with the A/C on full blast, on a 37-39'c day, running 275 MT Radials, about -0.3 rear camber, and with less grunt, you've got no chance ha-ha. Cool temp's are going to be interesting.

It's not looking all that good at the moment. How long have I got before they close the entries? Knowing my luck I won't be free... and 3 to 4 days out the schedule will change and I will be free!

Congrat's Hamish. Nice result! Nice and responsive too.

I hear ya with the traction issues.......

Theres still 10 spots left and i think entries close 12th March. Altho if spots arent full by then i would guess you can pay on the day.

http://www.dynoday.info/

All this E85 talk wants me to try it now, is there any news on how E85 will be expanding around the country? Is it ment to be becoming more readily available? I think it's going to take ages until we get some up here, even though we pretty much grow all the sugar canes! :glare:

Edited by PM-R33

Ran the car up quickly on the dyno this morning (1 power run only)to see what gains (if any) the new injectors,pump and actuator have made.

Just to recap.

Swapped out nismo 555's for sard 850's.

Swappd out Nismo pump for 044 intank.

Replaced 10psi actuator for 18psi one.

Previously the car made 337 with AFR's between 12-12.5 and spiking to 24psi trailing to 19psi (injectors at 100% duty)

This time the car made 346.6 with AFR's between 11.5-12 and spiking to 26psi trailing to 22-23 psi (injectors at 91% duty) will raise base pressure when i receive my fpr.

We will lean on it a bit more for the upcoming dyno day but very happy with the current tune.

Will post dyno sheet in the next day or so.

Lee

Guilt-toy, why don't you try running 50% BP Ultimate and 50% E85? That should give you more power out of the injectors compared to 100% E85 but more power than the BP Ultimate because of the higher octane rating. If you max out your injectors too early, try slightly lowering the boost until the injectors max out right on redline. Should be good for 400 i reckon!

It'd be a pain in the ass mixing it all the time but i reckon it'd be the perfect balance, especially considering you max out your injectors too early on E85.

Edited by bradsm87
Ran the car up quickly on the dyno this morning (1 power run only)to see what gains (if any) the new injectors,pump and actuator have made.

Just to recap.

Swapped out nismo 555's for sard 850's.

Swappd out Nismo pump for 044 intank.

Replaced 10psi actuator for 18psi one.

Previously the car made 337 with AFR's between 12-12.5 and spiking to 24psi trailing to 19psi (injectors at 100% duty)

This time the car made 346.6 with AFR's between 11.5-12 and spiking to 26psi trailing to 22-23 psi (injectors at 91% duty) will raise base pressure when i receive my fpr.

We will lean on it a bit more for the upcoming dyno day but very happy with the current tune.

Will post dyno sheet in the next day or so.

Lee

post-46183-1236143498_thumb.jpg

Edited by RB25DETS2

well after nearly 2 weeks on e85 i have made the executive descision that i will simply travel to whoop whoop once a week to fill up my car and 2 jerrys...

do not wanna go back to 98! :bunny:

we'll see how long before i get jacked of that :)

Yet another outstanding result, Lee. Congrat's. And to think, only a few months ago it was making almost 100rwkw less :bunny:

It looks like the 3037 (0.68) is starting to reach the limit with your current set-up (cams/head etc) given the mild 9-10rwkw gain from a 3-4psi increase in boost. But with near enough to 350rwkw, and very good response, you couldn't ask for much more.

Time to upgrade those cams now.

Yet another outstanding result, Lee. Congrat's. And to think, only a few months ago it was making almost 100rwkw less :)

It looks like the 3037 (0.68) is starting to reach the limit with your current set-up (cams/head etc) given the mild 9-10rwkw gain from a 3-4psi increase in boost. But with near enough to 350rwkw, and very good response, you couldn't ask for much more.

Time to upgrade those cams now.

Thanks Matt definately couldn't ask for more.....The 337 dyno was running a fair bit leaner so i guess if i was to run the current set up as lean there could be a few more kw hiding. I definately think the turbo and manifolds are getting very close to their limit.

As for cams they can wait until the engine needs to be opened (altho would be nice), time to enjoy it me thinks....

Did you manage to get the 14th off mate?

Lee

Not bad for stock cams and stock manifolds!

Yep, I'm good to go for the 14th. I'll have to get my entry in. However, there's one slight issue, one that may or may not be a show-stopper for me, my rear rubber. MT ET's don't handle knurled dyno rollers well at all, and I'm not all that keen on stuffing around swapping rears for the sake of a quick dyno shootout.

I'll have a chat to Shaun and see if he reckons they can give an accurate reading for one or two quick runs. We had to borrow a set of 'normal' rubber for the recent tune work.

I'll be at the dyno day no matter what, it's just a matter of will I or won't I run the '33.

Not bad for stock cams and stock manifolds!

Yep, I'm good to go for the 14th. I'll have to get my entry in. However, there's one slight issue, one that may or may not be a show-stopper for me, my rear rubber. MT ET's don't handle knurled dyno rollers well at all, and I'm not all that keen on stuffing around swapping rears for the sake of a quick dyno shootout.

I'll have a chat to Shaun and see if he reckons they can give an accurate reading for one or two quick runs. We had to borrow a set of 'normal' rubber for the recent tune work.

I'll be at the dyno day no matter what, it's just a matter of will I or won't I run the '33.

The Mickey's wont handle the dyno...they will shred rubber like a black hailstorm behind the car...ive seen it 1st hand with my car.

GuiltToy you said PFC knock detection was not up to scratch (can't find the original post now) but is the problem with the PFC hardware or software or the nissan knock sensors or all of the above? If I get a Link/Vipec will it function OK with the Nisssan knock sensors? I know that Link have a knock detection system as well - should I get their sensors or do i need to get a Gizzmo K-Mon to accurately set timing? (it's sort of on the subject ...I want to use an ethanol blend and do the tuning myself - I have a wideband meter).

well after nearly 2 weeks on e85 i have made the executive descision that i will simply travel to whoop whoop once a week to fill up my car and 2 jerrys...

do not wanna go back to 98! :D

we'll see how long before i get jacked of that :banana:

where are u going, werrabie??

GuiltToy you said PFC knock detection was not up to scratch (can't find the original post now) but is the problem with the PFC hardware or software or the nissan knock sensors or all of the above? If I get a Link/Vipec will it function OK with the Nisssan knock sensors? I know that Link have a knock detection system as well - should I get their sensors or do i need to get a Gizzmo K-Mon to accurately set timing? (it's sort of on the subject ...I want to use an ethanol blend and do the tuning myself - I have a wideband meter).

standard knock sensors are only good for 220rwkw. if you have more power then that then you need to change them. if you have a GTR then those knock sensors are better.

I would buy new vipec ones if you cannot afford a k-mon

standard knock sensors are only good for 220rwkw. if you have more power then that then you need to change them. if you have a GTR then those knock sensors are better.

I would buy new vipec ones if you cannot afford a k-mon

[/quote

just got my first 40l of e85 from united rozelle, does anyone have any tips on tuning to pass epa. i went last month and failed on 98.

the guy let me have a third run and i change my timing map up 3 degs and i fail worse than before,guess i should of gone down 3 degs lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...