Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think the GT-RS has a way to small exhaust side for an RB25. Massive back-pressure up-top.

The ultimate bolt-on responsive turbo for the RB25 has gotta be the HKS GT2835 Pro S bolt-on kit.

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...o/ac_gtpro.html

It's pretty much the spot-on size in both the compressor side and the turbine side.

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have to agree there...

mine hits full boost at 32-3500 and stays on till my 7400 redline...

i have an exhaust cam gear to bring it on earlier (at the exoense of like 10rwkw up top) and the car is an animal

Guess depends on if you wanna drive round or sit at home jacking off over dyno sheets...

You could combine the two....

Maybe that's why some people carry a dyno sheet in the glove box, all makes sense now!!

Just reading through this and you need to ask yourself do u want responsive power or laggy as hell.

I agree with hks gtr-s or 25/35 (30) for responsive power although may not pull the higher figures.

Guess depends on if you wanna drive round or sit at home jacking off over dyno sheets...

what a crock of shit.

i have a 3582r with a .82 rear and and i can see 24 psi by 4k

most of the other figures quoted from the other turbos in this thread are all full boost somwhere in the 3k - 3.5k range

and you will find 90% of gt30 size turbos are all gonna be around the 4k mark as well.

so what do you call laggy as hell?

imo do it once and do it properly

a gt3582r/iw will fit low mounted no worries, running at 15 psi you will make between 250 - 270 rwkws.

if the motor gets rebuilt then up the boost and make 350rwkws.

the thread title has been answered you make up your mind what your looking for.

remember guys you can build a mental set up and just detune it for reliability.

i have a GT-RS and a GT3040 and there is no doubt the GT-RS is the more responsive turbo. increases in throttle application generally you get more instant joy out of the GT-RS.

however, the GT3040 (aka GT3082) isn't too shabby to drive around, it needs a few more revs onboard but makes much more power once it is going. ultimately the compressor will be choked by the turbine on this version but it is a pretty good thing. so i am guessing it will feel not too dissimilar to a GT3582 at 75-80% of its max.

personally, i think something that can make 270-300rwkw for a rear wheel drive car is the best bet. this is about the limit of traction on road tyres and inside a power level for keep the stock engine chugging along for a while with good tuning.

so that means GT3076 sized turbo if funds permit with the addition of a merge collector manifold you can bring the boost threshold down.

so that means GT3076 sized turbo if funds permit with the addition of a merge collector manifold you can bring the boost threshold down.

so many people say that turbo is the go mate what u mean by merge collector manifold

How about the HKS GT2540? I don't see many people talking about this turbo. It's a direct bolt on as well to the RB25 Engine.

Probably because they are the laggiest turbo for the power they make and the cost to obtain them and I'm not sure HKS even make them anymore so the odds are that one you buy will be many years and kms old.

GT3076R as stated, is ftmfw

what are they worth mate

i have nfi to be honest, best to find one in kit form so its all nice and easy to bolt up , iv'e seen them as low as $1200 for the rb kit 2nd hand (the turbo is easily rebuildable). dr drift was looking into getting copies fairly cheap , it might pay to email him (he made 300+rwk with one, its in the rb25 upgrade thread)

Edited by toffy

here ya go , his exact words on his :thumbsup:

Want to make a few changes, upgrade radiator and maybe some coilovers, and the gearbox is whining after the weekend... Will try and make next day at Basky!

As for the L2, yes it's an EXACT copy... we've completely pulled the turbo apart and put it side by side with a genuine L2 and you CANNOT spot the difference...

Response on the 25 is pretty stupid, and I haven't even hooked up the VCT!! More to be had :D

Pulled the intake pipe off this aftenoon, and with over 1000km now on it (most of it HARD) there is absolutely no signs of wear at all!

I'm negotiating direct with manafacturer to try and get these in a bit cheaper, but I'm going to have to order min 10 pcs!

Edited by toffy
Assuming he does not take it to drag/drift/track days every weekend and keeps away from the rev limiter and a host of other variables that will kill an engine that is on the limit.

My 25 only sees drag/drift/limiter... But I do concede it seems abnormal for a stock 25 to make 305 rwkw reliably with 25 psi copy L2 and other budget bolt ons!

trust td06 l2 20g :spank: their maximum efficiency is right on the limit of a stock rb25 imo

Hell, even push them past their max efficiency... they just sing!

what are garrett 3082r like are they more laggy then a 3076r

turbo is rated at 600hp front cover is Ar .70 and .63 rear for quicker spooling

what would u pay for a second hand one

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done this both ways, I'd use the original loom & swap plugs on the engine side as you'll usually end up changing a lot of those anyway. Series 1 is usually non ABS which requires wiring which I can't remember how to do as haven't done it for over 15 years. The auto inhibitor is easy to bypass or in the meantime you can put it in neutral & unbolt it & tape it somewhere in the bay haha, then just wire reverse lights. I'd go straight to aftermarket ecu. A few basics are built in ignitor coils & reverse the CAS wiring, sort the plugs for whatever injectors & IAC-you can use an adaptor for the neo type otherwise the s1 will still work, use the knock sensors that suit the loom & it'll be pretty much running.  
    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
×
×
  • Create New...