Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 Gt-t Turbo Upgrade

R34_Wong

By R34_Wong,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

R34_Wong Mentor

R34_Wong

Posted
Posted

Hi everyone,

So Christmas has come, and I'm planning on getting a treat for my little beast. I've been reading through the forums and trying to assess what would be a better option for me, but I wanted to get an opinion from the masses as to what would be 'best' for me.

I'm chasing low-mid end power with this, but don't want to regret getting something that doesn't pull as hard.

So, my question is, if faced with a turbo upgrade which you were hoping to get excellent response from with some extra punch, which of the two would YOU get?

Please don't recommend others as I'm pretty settled in getting either one of these.

Thanks once again guys and gals of SAU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/250070-r34-gt-t-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites
PM-R33 Grand Master

PM-R33

Posted
Posted

The GT-SS is made for a RB26 setup, therefore different flange as wolverine has said. So out of the two obviously the GT-RS is the pick. If you wanted something smaller (similar to the GT-SS) then go a 2535 since you can get them with a T3 flange.

limpus Mentor

limpus

Posted
Posted
The GT-SS is made for a RB26 setup, therefore different flange as wolverine has said. So out of the two obviously the GT-RS is the pick. If you wanted something smaller (similar to the GT-SS) then go a 2535 since you can get them with a T3 flange.

The GT-SS is not similar to a 2535...the 2535 is closer to the GT-RS or 2871...and the GT-SS is closer to a 2510...which by the way can also be found in a t3 flange...but will be too small for a 25 neo...

PM-R33 Grand Master

PM-R33

Posted
Posted
The GT-SS is not similar to a 2535...the 2535 is closer to the GT-RS or 2871...and the GT-SS is closer to a 2510...which by the way can also be found in a t3 flange...but will be too small for a 25 neo...

I didn't mean the GT-SS is the same as a 2535, i meant if you wanted something smaller for earlier spool (which is why im guessing he said the GT-SS), than the 2535 is probably the smallest you would want to go. A 2510 on a RB25 is just a waste of money for an upgrade, like you have said.

discopotato03 Grand Master

discopotato03

Posted
Posted

Out of those two the GTRS would be the better choice for any RB25DET .

The two variants in the GTSS group are truly unique , the RB26 type is discussed elswhere here or you can search for it at turbobygarrett under GT2560R and -9 .

The second type I think is intended to be a CA18 or SR20DET upgrade , cartridge wise its like a GT2530 but with a 60 rather than a 63 trim 60.1mm compressor wheel . Probably best suit a CA or SR with a std computer and better exhaust .

I don't think I heard of HKS selling the second type GTSS with a T3 flanged turbine housing , possibly it would be OK on a mild RB20 but very tame on a 2.5L 6 I'd think .

Most people agonise over GTRS or GT2835 Pro S , cheers A .

PS Don't forget the BB Hi Flow .

bradsm87 Proficient

bradsm87

Posted
Posted

I know u said ur settled on the 2 turbos but I feel so stronglt that they're both shit for an rb25!

The GT-SS is SMALLER than the stock turbo so that rules that one out.

The GT-RS has an OK compressor side but the turbine side is again, too small for an RB25. They choke up on the exhaust side up high and need lots of timing pulled out which only makes temperatures even worse.

PLEASE, PLEASE consider a GT2835ProS bolt-on kit for the Neo! They have similar to the GT-RS compressor side but an exhaust side that will actually flow a bit. Much, much better turbo for an RB25.

PM-R33 Grand Master

PM-R33

Posted
Posted (edited)

A 2835 is a bee's dick bigger then the GT-RS, in essence the same turbo. Both use a 56 trim/71.1 compressor wheel however the 2835 is a .68 A/R where as the GT-RS is a .63 off of memory. However the 2835 kit is around $1000 more then the GT-RS kit. So it comes down to this, if you can afford the 2835 kit then go it, if you can't, go the GT-RS kit, simple as that. Both a great option on the RB25 and will not dissapoint.

Edited by PM-R33
bradsm87 Proficient

bradsm87

Posted
Posted

The gt-rs has a 52 trim with a 0.6 compressor housing. The gt2835pros has a 56 trim with a 0.5 compressor housing. The gt-rs has a 53mm 76 trim .64 t28 housing with a t3 flange. This is the big restriction. The gt2835pros has a 56mm 84 trim wheel with a .68 true t3 housing. This would flow more than even a .86 t2 housing.

Anyway, it's a lot bigger than just a 'bee's dick' bigger.

  • 1 year later...
discopotato03 Grand Master

discopotato03

Posted
Posted

Just rehashing an old one while searching .

The GTRS's turbine is actually closer to 54 than 53mm and a completely different turbine family .

Yes the compressor wheels are both 71.1mm GT ones but the RS's is a 52 trim where the 2835's is a 56 trim one .

From what I can tell , so far , the GTRs's compressor housing is based on a T04B footprint (backplate diameter) and it is 0.60 A/R .

The GT2835 Pro S's comp housing is supposed to be based on the larger TO4E family and is in 0.50 A/R .

I think the story is that HKS started out with the T3 flanged version of the GT2530 which uses the same hot side as the T3 flanged GT2535 , not sure if there was a T3 flanged GT2540 .

They obviously wanted something with a more modern compressor wheel than a 2535 or 2540 so they opted for the 71.1mm 52T GT compressor and manufactured a port shrouded compressor housing specifically to suit it .

It would be very interesting to back to back a GTRS and a GT2835 Pro S 0.68 A/R on a mild RB25DET .

There's obviously a bit more work in the Pro S as far as its inlet and filter goes and I'm not sure if you can use a std R33 or R34 GTS/GTt airbox with these turbos .

I guess it depends where you want you car to boost its performance engine speed wise and how much you want to spend doing it . The 2835 pro hands down should make more power with its larger GT30 based turbine and turbine housing though sometimes the power figures I've read suggests their outputs are not miles apart . So many engine spec variations and some people push their engines and turbos harder than others .

A .

simpletool Mentor

simpletool

Posted
Posted

Again GT-SS is too small, well it will run ok, but won't make significant more power than stock R34 turbo. People comparing GTRS and 2835 I agree with, these are much more suitable.

GTRS will probably cap out at 240rwkw (this is HEAVILY debated due to one or 2 cars getting more). 1 bar ~3100rpm. It is limited by it's exhaust wheel and housing being a bit small.

2835 prob cap out at 275rwkw, 1 bar ~3500rpm. Cropped turbine model in proper T3 footprint/T28 housing.

The two turbos are a decent amount apart in inlet/outlet area. 2835 is 7% more area on the compressor and 21% more area on the turbine.

PM-R33 Grand Master

PM-R33

Posted
Posted (edited)
GTRS will probably cap out at 240rwkw (this is HEAVILY debated due to one or 2 cars getting more). 1 bar ~3100rpm. It is limited by it's exhaust wheel and housing being a bit small.

Far, FAR from only one or two cars pushing more. No way in hell does the GT-RS cap out at 240rwkw.

From what I have seen over the years on the forum the average figure is between 250-255rwkw.

Not many go over 260rwkw (for reference the most I have seen out of mine was 263rwkw on the Microtech with no nitrous).

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • niZmO_Man
      R32 Nostalgia

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • niZmO_Man
      New R32 owner soon

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • TurboTapin
      R32 GTST - 600KW+ RB28/CD009 Build

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • Duncan
      1992 R32 GT-R Race Car

      By Duncan · Posted

      heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • Duncan
      Oil pan for RB25DET NEO Stagea "version"

      By Duncan · Posted

      meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...