Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when i was using Caltex, they were bang on E70 the whole time (except for one batch in the dead of winter being bout E65)

which reminds me, i need to check with Caltex if they've switched to 85% - you could always buy a sensor, not run flex-fuel but just use it as a monitoring tool.

hahah, yeah that's true. just buy straight ethanol and mix yourself! :D

but for normal tunes, a variation of E% a few in either direction isn't going to make a difference. Don't think Trent has anything smaller than a 5% change resulting in any timing/fueling change on my maps

  • 5 weeks later...

The turbo is still 600hp rated though, now matter what CR you have.

The only way to make that power with a 35 frame is if it is a hybrid, like a 3566 or similar with a big A/R and judging by that dyno graph it would have to be because that is a laggy curve for a 35R on a 3L.

Even still, 500kw Thread: ACCESS DENIED.

The turbo is still 600hp rated though, now matter what CR you have.

The only way to make that power with a 35 frame is if it is a hybrid, like a 3566 or similar with a big A/R and judging by that dyno graph it would have to be because that is a laggy curve for a 35R on a 3L.

Even still, 500kw Thread: ACCESS DENIED.

It's a GTX53R not a normal GT35R so it does flow another 70odd hp more...

In saying that the results are a little eyebrow raising and also don't fit into this thread

Well last time you posted then 490rwkw result you only ran 136mph... :merli:

Time to go back to the strip and see if you'll actually get near 140mph, they be the results we wanna see

Either way it's not 500rwkw - so have moved the posts to the 400rwkw thread.

  • 1 month later...

Well last time you posted then 490rwkw result you only ran 136mph... :merli:

Time to go back to the strip and see if you'll actually get near 140mph, they be the results we wanna see

Either way it's not 500rwkw - so have moved the posts to the 400rwkw thread.

car was making 431rwkw when i ran 10.8 @ 138 MPH

i have since gone to a new tuner and hence new results.

U know who micks motorsport is?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...