Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

any update stao on that rb25det gettin tuned? the one only running 9psi for now

He drove off to Adelaide, probably come back in 2 weeks to finish off the tune. I will postup result once its done.

Ok. This is our latest dyno result based on a ATR28G4 in a .64 T28 rear housing running on a build CA18det running 98 fuel. Car made 316rwkws at 24psi at this stage ( Note: see how the power curve is still rising. ). going to do a final tune in few days. This turbo would be making some mad power on RB engines using .63 rear housing.

atr28g4316rwkws2.jpg ________ atr28g4316rwkwstorques2.jpg

ATR28G4 would be some thing similar to a GT3076.

Its my daily car. I drive drive it around to deliver turbos. lol

CA's modifications: Forgied pistons, Split fire coils, Nistune ECU, FMIC, 700CC injectors, Z32 AFM, 256dur/8.9mm cams, Tomei adjustable cam gears, ebay manifold and 3inch exhaust. Every thing else not mentioned are stock.

That looks good. OP6 is still small. You need .63 rear. I can get one machined for for $250. But you need to make a new front pipe. Check That exahust place next to Trents.

  • 1 month later...

The guy got EPAed and defected on the way back from SA. its going to be a while before it go back to the dyno. Hoo and by the way there are plenty of ATR43's progress. The laser cutters finally got our flanges ready. So just matter of putting them together now. should have 2x samples done by weekend.

Its similar sort of CHRA. Rear housing is different. It will be a.63 Rear housing. that we made our selves. I'm plaining to make 4 different types of CHRA with 2x different sized A/R housings. which are powered from any thing at 230rwkws to 330rwkws depends on driving ability. I will post some photos once I get the housings finished.

no one does, i drive to Hoppers. Car runs 100% time on E85. Jerry cans ftw! :(

Hopefully some one starts selling it soon, im not as dedicated as you are :)

Whats the price of it now?

Edited by W0rp3D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...