Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It does look like the diagram has been rehosted, albeit a new version. Still factually incorrect unfortunately.

Quite amazing how that is even possible when I've already told him HOW it was wrong to begin with.

Have a look at the 2nd diagram, then look at my first reply and I am quiote confident even someone with grade 5 maths can work it out.

Perpendicular in the real work, parallel in the picture description. Fact remains the diagram is still wrong and blatantly sladering products.

Not ALL split dumps are bad. Such a blatant and incorrect comment should never have been made.

It does ....... made.

Stao's referring to the ebay model as you can see in the photo. We all got the idea of why it doesn't work, you don't have to be a smart ass telling every one he's dawning is not up to spec, and I don't see your 10 years turbo experience solved any member's potential problems or he will not be posting this. So keep your shit to your self, no one’s interested in it, don't post any crap unless its helpful to make things better.

just my 2c

Yeh dude, seriously dont write crap that is not useful, Tao is here to help us SAU'rs in turbos. I've had Tao's turbo's for years now, ive used it on a track and has never done any damage, I will be posting up dyno graphs soon of my new tune with a new highflow, Im using a cheap chinese dump pipe where it had a divider in it, i had to take mine off to fit it in my .63 rear housing.

Cheers,

Geraus.

Stao's referring to the ebay model as you can see in the photo. We all got the idea of why it doesn't work, you don't have to be a smart ass telling every one he's dawning is not up to spec, and I don't see your 10 years turbo experience solved any member's potential problems or he will not be posting this. So keep your shit to your self, no one’s interested in it, don't post any crap unless its helpful to make things better.

just my 2c

Not upto spec? Factually incorrect is what the diagram is. If highlighting incorrect information is being a "smartass" then god help us all.

It would appear you do still do not understand the key flaw in said diagram. Fair enough, but that does not mean that other more educated users won't come along and understand.

Everyone is interested about factual & correct information. Something which I have cleared up here (even if Hypergear refuse to take down incorrect diagrams).

Yeh dude, seriously dont write crap that is not useful, Tao is here to help us SAU'rs in turbos.

Not useful? Highlighting factually incorrect information is very important to expand ones knowledge. Were it not done, users would have been mislead/misinformed (once again).

Now the information is there, anyone that thought it was correct advice now knows that it is not, hence why I felt the need to post where I rarely would. Some less educated users would have taken the "experts" word as gospel when sadly it is far from it.

Guys I would like to keep this thread clean with information on turbo profiles and results only.

My diagram is not up to spec, just simply drawing so people get the idea. Please do so if you would like to draw a more detailed and specific diagram.

No more arguments about the drawing. Thank you all.

Please let me know if any one's welling to evaluate the new turbine wheel. Free dyno tune at Dr.drift for people with adequate mods.

Small update. This is from a customer's skyline running ATR43G2 in our .82 bolton turbine housing with restrictive intake pipe and stock airbox which resulted in boost drop. Not the best but I think its still a good overall result in comparing power curve with some of the OP6 high flows, and the power band still rises at 7000RPM, will make lot more power with a free flow 3inch metal intake pipe and a pod filter.

atr43g3822668rwkw.jpg

Naa looks like the turbo's can't suck in any more air out of stock induction pipe and air box. This turbo should be able to make a healthy 280rwkws.

This is my car.

I've finished the intake now (3" metal pipe with bov return and breather line welded into it, to pod filter) and it made a HUGE difference. Boost comes on about 500rpms earlier and holding boost strong untill redline.

Gimma a couple of weeks and I'll have it dyno'd again, should see some nice gains! :P

Can possibly high flow it with a BDR351 Comp wheel working with GT45 turbine wheel. Should pump out 1200HP. What sort of housing is it in?

Stao - Can you do anything with Toyota CT-12a's (1JZ twin turbo)

edit - just read through your website, how much to do 2x CT12's and what is done to them?

Andrew you have not even picked up the car yet and you doing the turbos. I LIKE YOUR STYLE!!!!!!!!!!!! :P

Have to modify toyota housings to suit Garrett bearing housing first, then profile them to suit larger wheels. They can be high flowed to some thing close to a 2060rs disco. you will need new water and oil lines once done.

Very similar to this:

ct20s.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...