Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

It does look like the diagram has been rehosted, albeit a new version. Still factually incorrect unfortunately.

Quite amazing how that is even possible when I've already told him HOW it was wrong to begin with.

Have a look at the 2nd diagram, then look at my first reply and I am quiote confident even someone with grade 5 maths can work it out.

Perpendicular in the real work, parallel in the picture description. Fact remains the diagram is still wrong and blatantly sladering products.

Not ALL split dumps are bad. Such a blatant and incorrect comment should never have been made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does ....... made.

Stao's referring to the ebay model as you can see in the photo. We all got the idea of why it doesn't work, you don't have to be a smart ass telling every one he's dawning is not up to spec, and I don't see your 10 years turbo experience solved any member's potential problems or he will not be posting this. So keep your shit to your self, no one’s interested in it, don't post any crap unless its helpful to make things better.

just my 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh dude, seriously dont write crap that is not useful, Tao is here to help us SAU'rs in turbos. I've had Tao's turbo's for years now, ive used it on a track and has never done any damage, I will be posting up dyno graphs soon of my new tune with a new highflow, Im using a cheap chinese dump pipe where it had a divider in it, i had to take mine off to fit it in my .63 rear housing.

Cheers,

Geraus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stao's referring to the ebay model as you can see in the photo. We all got the idea of why it doesn't work, you don't have to be a smart ass telling every one he's dawning is not up to spec, and I don't see your 10 years turbo experience solved any member's potential problems or he will not be posting this. So keep your shit to your self, no one’s interested in it, don't post any crap unless its helpful to make things better.

just my 2c

Not upto spec? Factually incorrect is what the diagram is. If highlighting incorrect information is being a "smartass" then god help us all.

It would appear you do still do not understand the key flaw in said diagram. Fair enough, but that does not mean that other more educated users won't come along and understand.

Everyone is interested about factual & correct information. Something which I have cleared up here (even if Hypergear refuse to take down incorrect diagrams).

Yeh dude, seriously dont write crap that is not useful, Tao is here to help us SAU'rs in turbos.

Not useful? Highlighting factually incorrect information is very important to expand ones knowledge. Were it not done, users would have been mislead/misinformed (once again).

Now the information is there, anyone that thought it was correct advice now knows that it is not, hence why I felt the need to post where I rarely would. Some less educated users would have taken the "experts" word as gospel when sadly it is far from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys I would like to keep this thread clean with information on turbo profiles and results only.

My diagram is not up to spec, just simply drawing so people get the idea. Please do so if you would like to draw a more detailed and specific diagram.

No more arguments about the drawing. Thank you all.

Please let me know if any one's welling to evaluate the new turbine wheel. Free dyno tune at Dr.drift for people with adequate mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small update. This is from a customer's skyline running ATR43G2 in our .82 bolton turbine housing with restrictive intake pipe and stock airbox which resulted in boost drop. Not the best but I think its still a good overall result in comparing power curve with some of the OP6 high flows, and the power band still rises at 7000RPM, will make lot more power with a free flow 3inch metal intake pipe and a pod filter.

atr43g3822668rwkw.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my car.

I've finished the intake now (3" metal pipe with bov return and breather line welded into it, to pod filter) and it made a HUGE difference. Boost comes on about 500rpms earlier and holding boost strong untill redline.

Gimma a couple of weeks and I'll have it dyno'd again, should see some nice gains! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stao - Can you do anything with Toyota CT-12a's (1JZ twin turbo)

edit - just read through your website, how much to do 2x CT12's and what is done to them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stao - Can you do anything with Toyota CT-12a's (1JZ twin turbo)

edit - just read through your website, how much to do 2x CT12's and what is done to them?

Andrew you have not even picked up the car yet and you doing the turbos. I LIKE YOUR STYLE!!!!!!!!!!!! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to modify toyota housings to suit Garrett bearing housing first, then profile them to suit larger wheels. They can be high flowed to some thing close to a 2060rs disco. you will need new water and oil lines once done.

Very similar to this:

ct20s.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...