Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

How does the dump fit with a different core on the turbo? or are the cores the same length?

Every thing fits the way it was, they are still your OEM housings. The T2x bearing housing is few mms short. But it doesn't affect installation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can possibly high flow it with a BDR351 Comp wheel working with GT45 turbine wheel. Should pump out 1200HP. What sort of housing is it in?

not sure on the rear housing size havent checked yet i would only want it to flow 1000hp anyway would the rear wheel even need changing for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure on the rear housing size havent checked yet i would only want it to flow 1000hp anyway would the rear wheel even need changing for that?

Depending on the engine size, for 1000HP you will need a 1.2 A/R turbine housing, and 87mm 85T turbine wheel. The T04Z runns of a 74mm 76T turbine wheel which is rated to 700HP, so it needs to go up in size.

Either way its not a cheap exercise so unless your T04Z is blown, its probably worth selling it and buy the T51R which we can supply at a very reasonable price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every thing fits the way it was, they are still your OEM housings. The T2x bearing housing is few mms short. But it doesn't affect installation.

My concern with that is if both cores ar 2-3mm shorter than the gap between the turbos opens up 4-6mm, thats enough to mean that double layered gaskets will be needed or it will leak like a sieve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good result for stock Rb20det, how come its so wavy on the top? ignition problems?

It's a hub dyno so they don't have the power dampened by the rollers which usually smooths out the curve... Plus RB20's always have a bit of a wavy top end

No ignition problems at all (had a lot more boost it in and didn't miss at all)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was with a G2 in .63, My engine blew up on dyno during the next run. Even thou that made the power and response, I still prefer .82 for high performance RB25det. unless if that was a 3576 profile.

.63 works out ok on RB20dets.

You find Rb25det with .82 rear makes power lot easier with less boost and lot less heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would lag be like though? Could it make 250kw at 120kph / 4500rpm ish like that does?

only cos for me i wouldnt be at the top of 4th much on track if at all (drift), or road so thats why i was thinking the .63 could be better for that reason?

Edited by raZ1911
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...