Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sargerx8, fk thats a good result so far!!!

keen to hit you up on the offer of taking me for a spin and you can come in mine after to see the difference.

I will miss the induction of my twins tho lol

Ive replied to your PM.

Cheers

sargerx8, fk thats a good result so far!!!

keen to hit you up on the offer of taking me for a spin and you can come in mine after to see the difference.

I will miss the induction of my twins tho lol

Ive replied to your PM.

Cheers

Report all found!

Why only 11psi ?

The actuator we got is too soft, even with my EBC set to 100% the most we could get out of it was peaking 11.5 - 12psi... The fuel pump was failing giving some iffy a/f ratios so the whole tune is alot richer than it should be just to keep things safe, Ive got the fuel pump sorted out, just need a 12 - 14psi actuator and Ill go back in for a tune touch up.

It appears he's got fuel pump issues from previous reply.

Yeah, the pump was on its way out, it failed on the second day after I got the car home lean popping all over the place. Its got a GTR pump in there and Ive got a brand new 040 as backup incase. Also the actuator we're using atm is only a 7psi actuator and the most we could get from it was 11.5 with ebc @100%

sargerx8, fk thats a good result so far!!!

keen to hit you up on the offer of taking me for a spin and you can come in mine after to see the difference.

I will miss the induction of my twins tho lol

Ive replied to your PM.

Cheers

We shall see how it fairs up :) Keep in mind what Ive said about the tune and what not, in a month or so I should be running it at full potential.

I have some Dyno updates on my ATR43 G2 with FNT upgrade.

My car for those who don't know

R34 GTT with unopened RB25DET NEO

Turbo as above

All supporting mods

running Caltex E-Flex

This is NOT professionaly tuned, The timing is slightly retarded from before the FNT run. I just touched up the AFR's

post-62296-0-36980300-1310424190_thumb.jpg

It feels amazing on the street! f**king LOVE the powerband!!!

I have also added this to my running upgrade plot.

post-62296-0-84194200-1310426591_thumb.jpg

NOTE: The FNT run was done on a different Dyno with slightly retarded timing. So a true comparison cannot be made.

The FNT feels like it looks here on the plot. Heaps better down low and through the mid range.

I'm starting to think that my Blitz CS return flow intercooler could be posing a restriction. But f**k it... It's so good to drive as is :)

piss off Pat, making me contemplate ripping the turbo off again for some FNT goodness....lol

bloody nice results man, very impressed.

Apparently Stao has an even better housing for the G3 turbo, but based on results shown you would be mad not to.

Such good value, as always.

Thanks for the feedback. Comparing the ATR43SS pagethe FNT affects on above dynosheet is identical.

Its more then just the few hundred rpms better in response. It changes the car's driving ability making it lot quicker in acceleration from standing and gear change.

To Add FNT nozzle into G3 housings cost $200 including return shipping.

All ATR43xx and PU high flowed units produced from 1/1/11 has FNT nozzle permanently casted into the turbine housing delivering better driving ability while not affecting top end power.

I have some Dyno updates on my ATR43 G2 with FNT upgrade.

My car for those who don't know

R34 GTT with unopened RB25DET NEO

Turbo as above

All supporting mods

running Caltex E-Flex

This is NOT professionaly tuned, The timing is slightly retarded from before the FNT run. I just touched up the AFR's

post-62296-0-36980300-1310424190_thumb.jpg

It feels amazing on the street! f**king LOVE the powerband!!!

I have also added this to my running upgrade plot.

post-62296-0-84194200-1310426591_thumb.jpg

NOTE: The FNT run was done on a different Dyno with slightly retarded timing. So a true comparison cannot be made.

The FNT feels like it looks here on the plot. Heaps better down low and through the mid range.

I'm starting to think that my Blitz CS return flow intercooler could be posing a restriction. But f**k it... It's so good to drive as is :)

That graph looks f**king sexy man, I love the straight line 280+rwkw all the way. I just wish I didn't listen to my tuner about 17psi being too high. Feels like I wasted so much money on a tune that I wont be staying on for very long :( I see almost 23 - 24psi going through your turbo. Are you controlling boost at all? I'm sure with a nicer tune and controlled boost you could make a little more power out of a little less boost too.

That would be from boost controller, I found this boost creep and drop behavior happens to customers with return flow coolers. check hary's result pre and after cooler tests:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__1640__p__5772487#entry5772487

Yeah looking at Harey's boost plot I'm even more sure it's the return flow intercooler restricting getting more power out...

But yeah it feels amazing, I'm not too concerned about getting any more out :)

Finally got my ATR43SS1 installed. After a short consideration I believe its totally worth paying $250 for one of stao's mechanics to install it onsite and buy what ever stao recommends from him self.

So I end up getting:

5x 2mm thick cooper washers: $20

1x hard 3 inch intake pipe made from 2x 45 degrees silicon hoses and 1x 45 degrees steel pipe: $80

1x hypergear's Blow off valve (Its massive, not a toy). modified and fitted onto my cooler piping. : $150

1x milled out brass plate blocking off my old BOV. $20

I've also bought an additional low pressure actuator for $100 installed for time been till the car is at a tuning stage.

His Mechanic showed up at 2pm yesterday and the whole thing was finished around 6pm. We went for a quick drive, felt good and no leaks. Paid the mechanic and called that a day.

Not really sure if the new turbo needed of running in, so I went for a 100KM trip today. This turbo is very responsive, on road response is about identical to my factory turbo, and it also a light "Singggggggg" sound on light throttle.

Performance wise, the ATR43 has a very strong take off. For example at take off at traffic light in 1st, 2nd, 3rd gear full throttle. The car would just launch, the power delivery is very linear from the first moment, and pulled harder and harder as it emerges red line. Like a smooth momentum with very strong and solid build up of power as engine revs out.

Drivability wise it's still very factory, with more power through out the whole rev range. My standard turbo in comparison just felt really flat after 4000RPMs.

The car's running about 9.5psi at moment on stock tune. Still waiting for few bits and pieces and I will post up my result once its fully tuned.

Money wise I spent on the turbo and installation plus hard intake pipe and custom bov fully installed so far is: $1970

The amount of time taken to install was bit over 4 hours including removing my factory turbo.

This is a brilliant turbo for a daily driver. Big thanks to Stao on the turbo plus the technical and mechanical support. Very happy . :cheers:

Edited by petero'nell

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
    • I don't know the answer to this, but did you have a look at the parts diagrams on amayama.com and see what they list around it for your car? As an example this should be it on my car. That's how I would check for required clips and things like that. But, I take no responsibility for you ending up with a box full of random OEM hoses, washers and clips after going down that path a few times. This definitely has never happened to me  
    • Most driving should* be done on one side of single lane divided roads. In the RHD world, you drive on the left side of the dividing line and the road is probably cambered equally on both sides. So your side of the road slopes away to the left. The same is true for the LHD world, just everything swapped to the other side and opposite slope. With a perfectly neutral, straight ahead wheel alignment designed to drive straight on a perfectly flat surface (or at least one that is level on the left-right axis, even if it has some slope in the fore-aft axis) you will not be able to drive on a cambered road without the car wanting to drift down the camber. You will need to add steering input in the opposite direction all the time. This is annoying. The solution has always been to set the camber and/or the caster to produce a continuous turning force in the opposite direction of the camber. The car will drive straight on the kind of camber for which it was set up, presumably as described in the top paragraph. But.... when the car is set up this way, as soon as you get into a lane, usually on a multi-lane surface road or highway, where the camber is not as presumed during setup, the car will usually pull to one side. In the RHD world, if you are in the fast lane on a big divided road, you are probably on the opposite camber compared to what the car was set up for (ie, sloping down to the right) and the combination of the setup and that camber will make the car want to go right pretty hard. Even a perfectly flat lane will tend to want to go right. There's no getting around it. Civil engineers who know their stuff (which is not an assumption that can always be made) will attempt to keep the variation in camber across a multi-lane road as small as possible, and if they can will attempt to make the fast lane as close to flat, or even cambered in the same direction as all the other lanes. This takes a lot of planning for drainage, control of levels, ability to deal with the elevation changes that occur at road junctions, etc etc. So it's not trivial to get it right. When they do make it work, then the annoyance is reduced, along with tyre wear, fuel consumption, etc. In theory, the civil engineers are supposed to worry about those aspects of road design also. * This used to be true, but now with very large highway systems, even just multi-lane surface roads running everywhere, it is less true now than it was, but the old assumption is the basis for describing the phenomenon, so let's just run with it for the moment.
    • I think the consensus was that's normal. Sloped road surfaces or something? I remember @silviaz went through this before. It might be one of those things you never notice until you pay attention to it.
    • Im not entirely sure exactly what or where its leaking from, he started to pull the boots to swap to my new tie rods + ends and it just vomited fluid, so he closed em up up, swapped the rod ends to the old rods and let me know so I can figure a solution out, im guessing its all origional as as I passed 103k miles earlier this year im sure its just in need of a full overhual/rebuild anyways.    If i could just yank it off and be good it wouldn't be an issue to ship it out and wait for the turnaround but the guy I work with doesnt really have space to keep my car for a week or two at a time, would rather drop it off and have a replacement ready to drop in
×
×
  • Create New...