Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

If it truly has full boost at 3k I really doubt it'll make over 250kw

garret who have far more engineering experience can't even make a turbo that does that, sorry to be negative but I just can't see it being true.

See turbochargers engineered in this project are solely for RB25det engines, Garrett would make a turbo to suit a variety of engines. There are room for improvement when designs becomes specialized.

At moment it feels like some where around the 280rwkws mark with very steady torque. Its drives very differently to any other turbos I've engineered or experienced so far. I'm expecting an out standing result.

If this turbo makes 280kw with full boost at 3k I will buy one in the near future, providing it holds the power to at least 6k on less than or equal to 20psi.

This will be a garret killer if it makes those results!

my current highflow makes full boost at ~3k but only makes 240kw on 18psi, so if I can get 40kw over that with the same response, holy shit!

What are the main engineering differences with this turbo over previous designs ?

Edited by Rolls

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

Dyno sheet please

Always watching Stao's progress, keep up the good work mate.

full boost at 3k and 280rwkw+ may be possible as thats exactly what I have now... just with a Garrett stamp and a slightly higher price tag.

NA + turbo does not count.

Nope - nothing special, no E85.

tuner said not much difference between what he has seen with normal turbo motor and the slightly higher compression NA with my turbo.

post-36975-0-79536600-1311255089_thumb.jpg this was with an electronic boost controller

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg this was with a bleed valve

Decent power for the street, very useable... as soon as I touch the accelerator I get boost..

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

Edited by Rolls

What turbo?

edit: just saw your post, how on earth do you get a GT3076 on boost by 3k? Most people are seeing 3.5 to 4k ? Was that with some ridiculous ramp rate?

The two runs are not equal... There must be some decent load and hold time on the EBC run as it starts at 9psi at about 2500rpm. A normal dyno run should start at around atmospheric pressure.

Second graph looks much more genuine with 18psi at 3500rpm which is pretty much what is expected from a GT3076R with a 0.63 :)

Edited by SimonR32

Its a good result :thumbsup: , high comp engine with adjustable cam gears would make a turbo spool earlier. Plus different dynos with different sittings would read differently. Compare to one of my earlier runs using the same dyno:

RB25DE high comp, adj cam gear, 3076 .63 ext gate, with a bleed valve

post-36975-0-72596700-1311255208_thumb.jpg

Standard RB25DET motor, stock head, ATR43G3 int gate, with Bleed valve. My run ended early due to misfire while still making 294rwkws.

post-27032-0-82969500-1311261862_thumb.jpg

They looks similar in terms of Power VS Response VS KM/H. But I know the SS-1 PU is more responsive. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...