Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes can be done, how ever big external gates are more effective when working with big turbo in small turbine housings. The SS2 and SS1PU versions has welly matched wheel size and housings. It might not make much difference in that setup.

I got the TFI filter for $10 inside discounted tray at Autobarn. lol. Its a 4inch filter with 2 set of sleeves. Worked fine, didn't had any restrictions at all.

I wouldn't go with external for power gain(and definitely not if there was power loss), its just for the option to run a screamer lol. I would love to hear your car with this thing going off atmo. Nice big boost, should sound tuff and loud.

Ill head there soon lol, always find nice stuff in those bins. f**king overpriced apexi shit.

will cost $450 to drill, weld and make scramer pipes, including material and tax. Please make sure the gate comes with both flanges. cheers

the finish is going to be the same as the one in page 29

its a pity here isnt a side mount manifold in this price range with ex gate attahcment so we didnt have to chop housings..in fact all the side mount mafifolds Ive seen dont have one...

There is a garrett gt30 style housing on ebay that has a cast in flange for a 40mm gate for around 400..

its a pity here isnt a side mount manifold in this price range with ex gate attahcment so we didnt have to chop housings..in fact all the side mount mafifolds Ive seen dont have one...

There is a garrett gt30 style housing on ebay that has a cast in flange for a 40mm gate for around 400..

That housing wouldnt be the best thing for flow i guess, but itd work.

However, I definitely rekon itd be a piece of piss to hang the gate off one of those tubular jobs. Might be worth doing.

Infact if I decide to go back to a TD based turbo on my SR im going to do exactly that with one of those cheap tubulars.

Hi Stao,

Do they PU models use a highflowed standard housing or a custom one which you supply?

You mentioned cooking intercoolers being an issue with the previous generation PU models - im worried that pushing a smallish (high flow) turbo such as these is risky for the motor due to the intake temps and therefore pinging during hard use, what is your opinion?

Hi Stao,

Do they PU models use a highflowed standard housing or a custom one which you supply?

You mentioned cooking intercoolers being an issue with the previous generation PU models - im worried that pushing a smallish (high flow) turbo such as these is risky for the motor due to the intake temps and therefore pinging during hard use, what is your opinion?

this is exactly my thought aswell.

How well do these new SS versions cope with heat due to the new compressor housings/wheels etc??

Ss1.5 made 259 kw 19psi. This was pushing the knock threshhold of the motor too. Left it nice and fat at 11.5afr.

Very torquey to drive. Clutch wont last long thats for sure.

Had 2 small hits of det whilst tuning high boost in the top end with fairly conservative timing compared to others. But made more than Sargerx8's ss2 for restriction reasons.

Max knock seen on the road after tuning was 12 with a 1st to 3rd flog

I know there is no problem with pushing a turbo at the edge of its efficiency for normal street driving where you might give it full throttle through a couple of gears at a time and back off but im more talking about when things heat up ie. sustained heavy load/full boost, track use etc.

Its not really a smallish turbo. Its about how the compressed air is dispatched. The only units that did have the old comp housing profile is that Sample unit, Every one whom bought later samples (after 2nd Aug 2011) or brand new SS1PU units has the updated housing profile, So no need to panic about it.

Ok lets talk abit into it. Based on the old SS1PU sample’s dyno reading:

power.jpg

boost.jpg

I'm very sure using the 15psi actuator and boost controller the red curve represents the exact curve of the 259rwkws you've tuned. So realistically the peak power was reached at roughly 15psi. I'm a bit concert using the high pressure actuator as the peak boost might be too much for a stock engine to handle.

Compare to current SS1PU’s dyno reading:

power.jpg

boost.jpg

Notice I’ve made more power on less boost, This is by the changing of compressor profile that allows compressed air to be “dispatched” faster resulting in lower dispatching temperature. Final results was very consistent as we did about 10 runs and every single run at that boost level was above 280rwkws, while the cooler stayed just little warm. Also the boost level that I'm running on is ok for a stock Rb25det engine.

The older sample SS1PU was not as consistent as the first run with cooler cold it made 291rwkws as the discharging temp increases the average power dropped to about 270rwkws after 10 consecutive runs. The cooler was literally hot to rest my hand on.

That's real life R&D, I only have a feel that some of the drawnings "might" work out better then others, how ever I can't prodict final results till its been individually evaluated.

Any way, DVS, I'm happy to update the comp housing profile for your customer if he can send his housing in for a day.

Tao,

Great work the latest SS1PU looks fantastic, torque from 3500rpm and 280rwkw on 98, well done!

The SS3 development is interesting too. Have you tried the SS1PU on the aftermarket exhaust manifold yet? Would be interesting to see the difference it makes.

SargeRX8,

Using an external wastegate is better at controlling boost and normally sees power gains due to removing heat etc. I cannot see how an external wastegate can loose power over internal.

Why are you blaming the Apexi pod filter? I run one with no issues, so do many others on this forum. Fix up your intake pipe to 3" metal with as little bends as possible. I tried reading what you have done and I cant understand what your saying. The intake pipe is vital to making power. Do not use any part of the standard intake piping.

Tao,

Great work the latest SS1PU looks fantastic, torque from 3500rpm and 280rwkw on 98, well done!

The SS3 development is interesting too. Have you tried the SS1PU on the aftermarket exhaust manifold yet? Would be interesting to see the difference it makes.

SargeRX8,

Using an external wastegate is better at controlling boost and normally sees power gains due to removing heat etc. I cannot see how an external wastegate can loose power over internal.

Why are you blaming the Apexi pod filter? I run one with no issues, so do many others on this forum. Fix up your intake pipe to 3" metal with as little bends as possible. I tried reading what you have done and I cant understand what your saying. The intake pipe is vital to making power. Do not use any part of the standard intake piping.

I changed my intake pipe yesterday, it is full metal, one bend. My apexi was not seeking perfectly flush against my z32, you could fit a piece of paper in the gap, maybe more and thus dirt got into the intake and damaged my turbo wheel.

I changed my intake pipe yesterday, it is full metal, one bend. My apexi was not seeking perfectly flush against my z32, you could fit a piece of paper in the gap, maybe more and thus dirt got into the intake and damaged my turbo wheel.

Ah that sucks! So its not the filter itself but the fitting to the afm is not the right shape?? Can you send it back and get a refund or another one? Surely thats a manufacturers fault.

I changed my intake pipe yesterday, it is full metal, one bend. My apexi was not seeking perfectly flush against my z32, you could fit a piece of paper in the gap, maybe more and thus dirt got into the intake and damaged my turbo wheel.

is there a gasket between the pod and the afm?

there should be :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...