Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My cold starts idle at around 10 on my wideband. I kind of actually can't stand the lean popping but I always thought it was something which shouldn't be happening. My car is sucking alot of air, -95 according to my profec b. My old car sat on around 85. When this one idles at 85, I know I popped off a vac line somewhere.

Ill take away some fuel and see what she does.

I have no idea. It reads positive boost, for example, as 100 which is 10.0psi. 155 would be 15.5psi. It reads vacuum as -95 on idle, -50 maybe on cruising, so I have nfi.

Most likely -9.6mmHg then, that is fairly low. My skyline reads about negative 14-15 and negative 20 when backing off at higher rpm.

Might be inches of mercury and not millimeters, and hence -0.99 inches, but that = -25mmHg which is far too high vacuum.

I'm stumped, it should be either of these units, I don't even know what else you can measure vacuum in. It is possible that 9.9 is just the maximum reading and it can't read any higher vacuum than that, when you back off at high revs does it read a number higher than 99 ?

99 is the highest number it reads in negative pressure, vacuum. Then it bounces back to idle. My other boost gauge shows -20 vacuum when on idle. For me I ignore these figures. I listen to the engine and I can hear if it's idling right and feel it through that chassis. Feels good as is.

It works like this .

You can't measure a vacuum because it is nothing zip zero zilch . Anything abouve a total vacuum is positive pressure even if it isn't as high as sea level atmospheric pressure here on earth .

The confusion exists because cork head humans got in the habit of measuring air pressure using two different base lines or datums .

1) Absolute Pressure Psi"a" . The correct way is to say a total vacuum is zero and anything above is positive pressure and it puts sea level airpressure at around 100 kpa/1000 millibars/14.7 psi (same). Some engine management systems read off absolute pressure with a manifold pressure sensor so 0 would be a total vacuum and 100 kpa sea level atmospheric pressure . Abouve 100 kpa is said to be positive pressure ONLY because its higher than atmospheric pressure . Anything from 1 to infinity is positive compared to absolute 0 .

2) Gauge Pressure Psi"g" . This is where pressure is referenced using sea level air pressure as 0 . When you have a compound gauge it trys to show you pressure thats lower than its 0 when the pressure is lower than atmospheric . They are really just a means of making a distinction between atmospheric pressure and anything thats added to it .

The silly thing is gauge pressure can make people think you can have a negative pressure when in fact technically speaking you can't have less than nothing .

From a tuning perspective I think absolute pressure (psia) is better to use because the graduations rising from absolute zero are easier to comprehend than ones rising either side away from an atmospheric pressure 0 datum .

Next time you look at a turbos compressor map pay attention to the pressure ratio (PR) scale . Because these pressures are a ratio of anything above atmospheric pressure to atmospheric pressure they will say for example PR = 2 when a compound guage shows 100 kpa/15 psi . This is because the first 1 bar (bar means barometric sea level air pressure) is just this and the second bar is the pressure above atmospheric .

An absolute pressure gauge would show atmospheric pressure as 100 kpa/15 psi and the second bar as 200 kpa/30 psi .

A .

Also explains why 20psi with all factors the same isn't double the air of 10psi, it is actually 24.7 and 34.7 psi, so a ~1.3x increase in air, not 2x increase in air.

And explains why you make less power the higher up a mountain you go.

Edited by Rolls

hey not sure if in right thread but since i have a hypergear turbo i thought id ask My atr43g3 turbo run at 18psi straight from the actuator but when i replaced the head gasket the exhaust cam was found to be 2 teeth out. Since i have put them back to proper timing car now boosts at 15psi Just wondering if thats happened to anyone else?

Less restriction, hence same airflow produces less boost. You are probably making the same power yes?

edit: You said exhaust cam not intake cam, it has now advanced the exhaust timing, hence less energy is wasted out the exhaust, the turbo then sees less energy and spools less hence less boost.

Makes sense to me, your car is probably running much efficiently, however it is probably slightly laggier in regards to boost response, it will flow better in the high rpm now though.

Your power curve will have shifted towards redline slightly, you will make more power though, that is if you get it retuned on 18psi, DEFINITELY get it retuned, the load points will have completely changed, you could be detonating driving it like that.

Edited by Rolls

Bugger another tuning session lol Makes sense though as the car is more lag down low but i haven't tried to feel whats up high

Also the tuner at the time overloaded the timing in the car by about 10 degress ( 35 degress at 6500 rpm ) I have backed timing off the whole chart down to 24 degress at 6500max after most of the spark plugs got destroyed with the head gasket.

but i haven't tried to feel whats up high

Don't, seriously don't load it up on boost at all until you get the tune checked. Won't cost much to tweak it hopefully, just depends how out it is now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...