Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stao does that then mean the water lines etc will line up perfectly or will they be the same as my current SS1PU.

I had a huge headache with the r33 organising the oil return and the water lines when fitting it so I thought if I stuck with the stock setup for the R34 then I wouldn't have that issue again.

The SS1PU has the smaller bearing housing. So they are same the as earlier version.

G2/SS2 and larger versions runs the larger T3x bearing housing. Those are easier to install. Best to have a look at the installation walk through for both in page 1.

Can reuse factory compressor end, not the turbine end. Which gives it a factory look.

Birds. For the drags you will need some 275 MTs, run them at 18psi, and worm them up nicely. If the launch is perfect then a good time is more promising.

One thing I didn't like about Heathcote is how they washes rubber residuals at the start of runway with water every time a car lunches. So we always taking off on wet tires.

They do that at all drag strips, just go around it...

I can't fit 275s without some serious bubble; I only have 9 inch wheels and they come out quite wide to the guards already :(

Can anyone with an SS1PU and a Z32 AFM please check their peak AFM voltage on WOT (preferably 3rd of 4th gear) ??

Stao if you can ask Trent for this that would be great also.


Thanks,

I'm running the 275 on 9.5 inches wheels in 17 inches. You can get them to fit.

By the way, I've found a local company whom's happy to produce the braided oil lines at a much cheaper price. as well as the quantity that we are producing. I'm happy to deduce $100 off all High flow jobs as we as none special priced listed items.

Means your high flow job is now $860, and SS1PU/SS2 is $1350 all including oil lines.

...

Also we are a little over stocked with our billet SS2.5's parts. Now offering cheap for $850 each complete turbocharger with oil line.

...

...

Means your high flow job is now $860, and SS1PU/SS2 is $1350 all including oil lines.

C'mon Stao you're killing me, having bought a regular price SS2 just last week ;)

Great prices people, get on em!

Can anyone with an SS1PU and a Z32 AFM please check their peak AFM voltage on WOT (preferably 3rd of 4th gear) ??

Stao if you can ask Trent for this that would be great also.

Thanks,

No members with an SS1PU want to help out a member who does his best to help everyone he can? :(

I don't have a multimeter sorry mate

If you have a powerFC it will show on the handjob (hand commander), or it will show if you have the software for a nistune if thats what you run.

If anyone has access to either of the above with the same turbo please let me know what reading they are getting at WOT in higher gears :) peak reading.

Birds don't you run a PFC with your SS1PU?

Lol awesome, that's hilarious :)

Good luck for the weekend, will be interesting to see!

comp.jpg

turbine.jpg

Yes indeed, in fact all the guys at tires joint were beating wither this is car has an intercooler or an oversized radiator. I just made 1 person $100 richer today, no one thought this is a turbocharged kia. Ended up with some 225 / 65 / 16 Nitto tires. Still wheel spinning and torque steer all over the places. MT don't make any tires in this size.

How ever this result might give a little indication of what the SS1.5 would do on a SR20det motor, knowing the .64 might be a little chockish, this is running a .86 FNT rear with a 66mm compressor. We were been able to add an additional 5 degrees of timing compare to what it was in the .64 rear. Because the additional timing down low and up top, we ended up picking up 40kws with out getting additional lag.

At about 20psi this turbo would be an idle turbocharger for a SR, with similar response to a Disco.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...