Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think up 200rwkws @ 15psi is all good

The 8 additional psi for 8kws part is not normal. Is the car running a 3inch metal induction pipe? if so try again with exhaust dropped from the cat.

Also is VCT enabled with this SR?

How do I embed photos?

Got my s14 tuned today with a hypergear ss1pu, bit of a disappointing result, but that's more to do with my setup unfortunately.

Photo speaks for itself, high boost, low power, choking for some reason, new exhaust coming.

IIRC results were: 188kw @ 14psi, 200kw @ 15psi, 203kw @ 18psi, 208kw @ 23psi

http://s702.photobucket.com/user/Joey92_4020/media/20131107_165404.jpg.html

Something here is very wrong. What did your tuner say about the issue?

It's reasonably proven now that the SS1PU on an SR is within the realms of a responsive turbo, and will make 240 without breaking a sweat.

Yours is both laggy and failing to get anywhere near the power. If you go back to page 1 you will be able to find my dyno sheet in the reference list, mine is an SS1PU on an SR with NO VCT.

you sure your tuner knows what he is doing?

that power band looks totally McFuarked.. looks like there's massive amounts of timing pulled out after it goes on song.. also looks really laggy?

My exhaust is really mix and match, 2.75" china split dump, mild steel front pipe, stainless 3" from there to 2.5" muffler, back to 3" stainless with twin 3" tips. He said changing this to a straight 3" will really help. If the gains are shit after that, then to look at the cam timing.

It felt really responsive when I first put the turbo on last week, and that was with the ecu still tuned to big injectors and the 3071, definitely feels laggier since being tuned though.

It was determined that the VCT in this is not working, so I'm on the lookout for reasonably priced vct gears as well.

Comparing the graphs, this comes on a lot sooner than the 3071 60kph instead of 102, but full boost on this is at like 150, whereas the 3071 was 140.

The tuner is fairly reputable up here in Brisbane, but maybe I will try somewhere else after I change the exhaust.

While I'm here, is 3.5" exhaust setup going to be too big? Found a well priced stainless one secondhand, but not sure about the size...

My exhaust is really mix and match, 2.75" china split dump, mild steel front pipe, stainless 3" from there to 2.5" muffler, back to 3" stainless with twin 3" tips. He said changing this to a straight 3" will really help. If the gains are shit after that, then to look at the cam timing.

It felt really responsive when I first put the turbo on last week, and that was with the ecu still tuned to big injectors and the 3071, definitely feels laggier since being tuned though.

It was determined that the VCT in this is not working, so I'm on the lookout for reasonably priced vct gears as well.

Comparing the graphs, this comes on a lot sooner than the 3071 60kph instead of 102, but full boost on this is at like 150, whereas the 3071 was 140.

The tuner is fairly reputable up here in Brisbane, but maybe I will try somewhere else after I change the exhaust.

While I'm here, is 3.5" exhaust setup going to be too big? Found a well priced stainless one secondhand, but not sure about the size...

Also need check cat inside.

Look carefully at the cat with a broomstick and/or a hole saw

This. Use the broomstick to remove the inside of the cat so you can see inside it and check it's clear.

I believe That SS1PU's result is a little low, might due to some parts of the setup. Refering to John's 21U's high flow result. It made 320rwkws on E85 with factory setup, same as what SS1PU made on a proper high mount with external gate. The new high flow should make similar power or higher power as the SS1PU. Which I will just have to work on a more responsive and more powerful version of it :D

Another result of a bolton version of SS2 sent in today. from a R34 Skyline using Pump 100 fuel.

Final figure of 293rwkws @ 17.5psi

power.jpg

And perfect internal gated boost control.

boost.jpg

Another result of a bolton version of SS2 sent in today. from a R34 Skyline using Pump 100 fuel.

Final figure of 293rwkws @ 17.5psi

That's a very good result, I assume it's a manual? Is it possible to get a list of supporting mods?

I know that the auto driveline wastes power but there's a 36 rwkw difference between this and my R34 auto (same boost), which seems like quite a bit.

I havent had it on my car to max it out yet, but current result does appear to be the case. specially those results are from 20 years old stock engines.

Do the water lines and oil lines stay in the same spot when you high flow one of them?

Or will it take some adjusting of the water lines to make a high flow 21U fit like how you do with the SS1PU

They all boltup using stock lines and factory drain, so fitting up is bit easier then the SS1PU. Will be conducting further evaluations based on this model.

That's a very good result, I assume it's a manual? Is it possible to get a list of supporting mods?

I know that the auto driveline wastes power but there's a 36 rwkw difference between this and my R34 auto (same boost), which seems like quite a bit.

nope that sounds about right...

So with a high flow 21U I wouldn't have to bend the stock water lines like I did when I fitted the SS1PU?

Just trying to work out my options for my R34

I have an SS1PU to transplant into the r34 but I don't want to go through the issues I had with the oil drain and the water lines.

Then I have to get to that water line behind the block. I tried to get to it last time and just couldn't figure it out. Also if the new 21U is better than the SS1PU then I may as well upgrade if its easier to install.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...