Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you hold down the mode button on mode 1 2 3 & 4 is the gain 20 all the way through them? you can set it differently for each mode by holding down the mode button for three seconds then adjusting with the select button.

Yes, Gain is 20 all the way through channels 1 to 4.

If you are using a Mac solenoid for boost control. I'm not if this EBC allow different gain settings at different RPMS which some ECU support. You can can use perhaps 50% gain down low and 100% gain after 5000. But either way the SS2 should have a slight creeping behavior working with a EBC, I think the drop could be related to insufficient supply of air or discharge of hot air inside the exhaust. See if boost level changes after 5000RPMs without air box lid and mesh filter first, then try a hollow cat ( I can lend u one if you need ).

This is a newer high flow profile available for Rb20det owners. It is very specifically aimed at response. The profile configuration works out very close to a 2871 in 52T. Maximum power wise would be expected around the 230rwkws mark depending on supporting mods and amount of boost given.

comp.jpg

turbine.jpg

Yes, Gain is 20 all the way through channels 1 to 4.

Just to correct some mis-information i gave...the gain is the same all the way through because you can't set it individually for each mode. each setup is different but i've found a gain of 30 and setting of 60 to work well to 1.18bar or if i want a different response i set gain to 7 and setting to 71 which gives me 1.18-1.2 bar.

Just to correct some mis-information i gave...the gain is the same all the way through because you can't set it individually for each mode. each setup is different but i've found a gain of 30 and setting of 60 to work well to 1.18bar or if i want a different response i set gain to 7 and setting to 71 which gives me 1.18-1.2 bar.

Thanks man. Yes I thought it might be the case that there's only one global gain setting. So mine is currently at setting 55 and gain 20 and peaks at around 1.35 bar.

I feel that the tuner has a good job given the constraints of the EBC. The next thing I'll investigate is the possible restriction in the exhaust (cat) or intake (airbox, IC).

Best to upgrade induction and exhaust first then play with the EBC as the end result will vary.

I'm posting up an promotion on our new ATR43SS-2 internally gated bolton turbochargers so more people can enjoy our latest development. The Retail price on this item is currently $1450, you can have own them now for $999 including braided oil feeding line. The Special offer is for 20 units only. That is currently the best performing RB25det bolton turbocharger.

comp.JPG

Product details and Dyno results are:

http://www.hypergearturbos.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=72&product_id=81

  • Like 3

This is the larger version of the 2nd generation SS2. It is 1.5mm bigger on compressor side and 3mms larger on turbine side. More power. :woot:

On the less complicated to build turbochargers. Since we have found good uses of a CNC machine that we can rent, we will be making TD06L2 based turbochargers are a very cheap price. that will be the SLSS2 and Sl20.5G turbochargers. Will update new pricing and details shortly.

This is the larger version of the 2nd generation SS2. It is 1.5mm bigger on compressor side and 3mms larger on turbine side. More power. :woot:

On the less complicated to build turbochargers. Since we have found good uses of a CNC machine that we can rent, we will be making TD06L2 based turbochargers are a very cheap price. that will be the SLSS2 and Sl20.5G turbochargers. Will update new pricing and details shortly.

I thought you had your own CNC machine? I thought that was how you make the billet compressors?

For the quantity that I'm currently doing its not worth to own. Also its only worth while using CNC making a number of identical housings at once, which in my case its different combinations for different customers. So most of the housings are still hand made on lathe on milling machine.

The SS wheels are originally just a machined version of the cast wheel, trailed and modified through time by my self. The CNC programming was done by an engineer that I hire, I also hire and work with many other engineers for different purposes on the development and manufacturing of a turbocharger.

Other thing worth mention is the CNC machine that does the profiling and machining of the comp and turbine housings are not the 5 axis machine that does the billet wheels. Those are CNC lathe and mills. One does all the machining of the horizontal profile and groves, and the other one does all the drilling and tapping of the holes. In which the Greedy comp and turbine housings that are made to run on C clip and V clamps are cheaper and quicker to produce as all aspects of machinery was done on one horizontal CNC lathe.

Can't machine a cast wheel, material is too soft. it starts as a copy of the cast wheel, which is a Billet comp wheel that is identical to a normal cast wheel, I then took it for a dyno run for a base output.

From there I modify the wheel blade shapes, tips, height, hub sizes and etc then evaluate each and single modification done to see what sort of differences it has made compare to base output on a dyno. Drawing of the better performing wheel where sent to produce in a batch. Like I've mentioned, my Skyline have done 1807 dyno runs since the start of this project, and probably made this thread containing more dyno readings then the dynosheet section plus a lot more that wasn't posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...