Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finally got my car finished so here is the mod list and result:

Hypergear SS2 bolt on, 460 LPH walbro, xspurt 1000cc, return flow FMIC, custom split dump and 3 inch exhaust, splitfires, scotty's intake pipe, NPC clutch and a haltech plug in.

Results were:

240rwkw at 15psi on 98 (exactly what I asked for just safe and drivable) and

320.6rwkw at 22psi on E85!!

Power comes on very strong but still drives fairly well off boost. Full boost was hit before 130km/h in 4th and stayed perfect right throughout which is good for the internal wastegate. Dyno showed once the power peaked it very slowly fell away which is probably due to factory cams and valves but it's still awfully impressive.

post-95739-14170810196569_thumb.jpg

Thanks so much Stao for a great turbo, Paul and the boys at pulse racing seemed very impressed by it!!

  • Like 3

Nice result

I would expect that from mine when i get a retune @ 20 psi.

Pretty much exact same mods as you.

Im getting ~264kw @ 16 psi at the moment.

Is that on 98 or E85? The red line on that dyno graph is my 15psi run on E85 and that was 280 which was freaking amazing I thought

Great result. Thanks for sharing.

Further evaluation and testing, Since the ATR43SS-2 Alpha is too small for the Rb26det engine, I have made an customized SS-4 Alpha turbocharger using a much larger turbine, compressor how ever is slightly smaller then the current retail version. The goal is still 350rwkws on pump fuel with optimum responds. The new turbocharger drives great on road, be interested to see what the dyno says next week.

turboside.jpg

enginebay.jpg

I think I have found the reason for my boost tapering issue, looks like a silicon hose wasn't tightly clamped.

leaksilicon.jpg

IMG_20141202_135955.jpg

Been to the dyno today, It appears to have some sort of flow restriction or a boost leak some where, the new turbo is a 3582 equivalent made exact same amount of power as the smaller SS-2, while the boost tapering issue is unsolved.

But either way implanting VNT system on Rb26det engine is very successful. at 4100RPM the differences between engaged and disengaged was 10psi and 60kws.

Brown is full engaged, Blue is dis-engaged, light blue was when we did some experiments with VNT trigger that can be discarded.

img029b.jpg

boostmarked.jpg

Back to dyno again next week, hopefully with the boost issue fixed.

The boost tapering looks like a pressure drop across the core very similar to page 83 . There are no leaks, I will be upgrading to a standard 600x300x75mm cooler as well as getting rid of the factory twin bovs, Hopefully that will make a difference.

I've made few plugs and completed and leak test, which plugged the cooler piping that connects to the turbo, the 3.25 inches end that goes to the inlet manifold as well as the bov return. I pumped 20psi through using a compressor and it held pressure fine. It has a full 3inches turbo back exhaust. I can't think of any thing else apart from the cooler. Hopefully the new cooler fixes this problem.

It came in with stock exhaust. Before tuning with the twin N1s, I've had a JJR's twin 2.5 inches dump / front pipes installed along with a 3 inches turbo back exhaust with all straight through mufflers. Other three singles turbos they all had a brae made 3inches turbo back front pipes. The engine was pretty happy taking timing it did not appear to have symptoms of a block exhaust.

Funny I always end up with previously modified cars making crazy power that I've personally put very little work in, trouble shooting issues through modifying a fully stock car is a very different experience, hopefully after every thing is sorted, this thread would contain some useful data for RB26 modifiers.

adding one more result. This is an bolton version of an ATR43SS-2 on a RB25det with usual supporting mods making 278rwkws @ 17psi on a Dyno dynamic dyno, Sheet is a bit blurry, will have a clear photo updated once received. For now:

278rwkw.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...