Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i have come accross a cheap RB20 NEO from an R34. I understand its a whole 140hp of 2L goodness and was the most economical engine in the R34 range. But thats all i can find out on them? Does anyone else know much about them?

Looking at the timing belt cover there is a pronounsed bulge, so i am thinking it has variable inlet cam like the RB25s. I want to see if anyone knows anything of them before i buy it...but i am hoping it has a better head and possibly uses solid lifters and may accept RB25 Neo cams etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/
Share on other sites

Might be worth contacting Brad from spool imports. I believe he had a rb20 neo head for sale a while back and from what I could tell I think they have solid lifters and also run an inlet butterfly setup similar to the redtop rb20's.

Spool Imports

Edited by HR31_RB20DET
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-4572516
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

The 20Neo is obviously a far better engine than the old 20. It has everything that is good about the 25Neo......but it is missing 500cc. Same as the old RB20s. Makes one wonder why one would bother buying one and doing the work to install it in something when there is a 2.5L version available.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-6646533
Share on other sites

I can't think of a reason to keep any car's engine capacity to 2L where it would make more sense to use an RB20 than a 4 cylinder like an SR20. Any Skyline can be legally embiggened to 2.5L without pain. Anything smaller car that can't go above 2L capacity would not be a good thing with a heavy lump of cast iron 6 cylinder in the front.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-6646857
Share on other sites

I can't think of a reason to keep any car's engine capacity to 2L where it would make more sense to use an RB20 than a 4 cylinder like an SR20. Any Skyline can be legally embiggened to 2.5L without pain. Anything smaller car that can't go above 2L capacity would not be a good thing with a heavy lump of cast iron 6 cylinder in the front.

Yeah, agreed here...kinda makes more sense in any situation to go SR20 over RB20

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-6647766
Share on other sites

Yeah, agreed here...kinda makes more sense in any situation to go SR20 over RB20

It definitely makes more sense to use the SR20... as long as you dont mind driving around with ear muffs on to hide how crappy they sound :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-6648391
Share on other sites

Someone somewhere must know the exact differences with late RB20's . Variable cam timing and a shim type valve train would be worth having .

I'd also be looking at chamber shape and size because they changed on the Neo 25 - possibly be cause of emissions and detonation reasons .

How do the CR and power output compare R32 to R34 RB20s ?

Is there an engine manual available that covers all the R34 era RBs ?

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/#findComment-6650104
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My apologies. I forgot we were talking about weird beard M series stuff. Had been talking elsewhere with someone about an R33 with similar subject and got confused.
    • Nope, I don't like the look of ND RF, or any ND really, I don't like their faces or arses, why, because of their "modern" lines, the NC, whilst "modernish" has a more rounded shape that I like Well, that's how my overly judgemental eyes see it anyway  
    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
×
×
  • Create New...