Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am raising this thread to see another nice rays of sunshine after a bit of break.

First of all, Hello, I'm new member in here. I actually live in Finland but I find getting any useful information in Europe way too hard so here I am.

I am currently starting a build of '79 200B SSS (known as 180B in here but chassis is 810). Original L18 engine with dual carbs is not going back. Car has to have no more that 168 hp to meet legal regulations. I weighed some options in my mind and I found by accident RB20DET without turbo or manifolds for next to nothing so I bought it before anyone else had a chance.

My initial idea was to make it NA as it has 212 hp stock and it is really hard to "detune" it so that it meets regulations with turbo. I stumbled upon this thread in my journey for information about RB20 heads and I have found NEO head very interesting for a swap to "silver top" RB20DET bottom end and running it NA. CR is a great mystery, but for NA I am not going below 10:1 and I prefer something 10,5:1 -ish.

Something that catched my eyes was

On 8/15/2013 at 7:49 AM, BenR said:

*******

But because of the ridiculous tip heights on the valves you need to run solid lifters from a renault on the exhaust side and solids from a ka24de or a toyota tacoma on the intakes, and you'll need 1.5mm shims on the inlet and 3mm on the exhaust.

*******

I really hope BenR could catch up if he has more information about this engine he built (and has probably scrapped it already years ago). This is still a long shot for me as the build is just about to begin with all rust problems etc. but for now, information is what I mostly need. I work as mechanical engineer so I at least have an illusion about knowing something engines and I have access to some manual machining equipment.

Thanks for any info you have, I mean ANYTHING is a plus. and if someone asks, 6 cyl just for the "cool-factor" and audio. There is no good reason to do this what I can think of but hey, it's something completely different and should meet legal requirements.

 

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7895711
Share on other sites

I really don't think i will be able to help you in regards to what BenR has said mate, however i do have info relevant to this thread.

Should be picking up an RB20DE Neo with only 60,xxx km on in in the next day or two. Was purchased through a reputable wrecker in Melbourne with evidence of genuine km.

I am currently running an R32 RB20DE with fully refreshed standard head and no modifications to the bottom end with an EFR6758 on it. I would have stuck with that engine combination if the RB20 Neo didnt come up so cheap.

Just to confirm @FinnDatsun you have an RB20 Neo or Vanilla silvertop RB20?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7895719
Share on other sites

I think I lost my thought, it was 2 am at the moment here.

Engine has to be dynoed, and there is some sort of common practice that if you have a turbo, it should run "reasonible" boost.

My first interest would be information about how the head bolts to silver top block, combustion chamber volume for CR calculation and so on, to see if it would even run. BenR seems to have all this info already and the valvetrain modification is a curiosity for now. But being able to rev never hurts now that head should have better flow figures to start with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7895799
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
6 hours ago, sav man said:

Bumping this thread up again.  Anyone know where I would be able to find a RB20 NEO, I really only want the head but will take a complete engine if avaliable.

1. Try the for sale section

2 Try advertising in the parts wanted section

3 Ring around the wreckers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7917005
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

I have a complete RB20 Neo, absolutely immaculate and only 60xxx Km on it. Honestly i am not looking to sell but if you throw me a stupid high offer i may let it go. PM me if you want.

I tried to PM you, but forum said no

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7917094
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Bumping this up

So, I have been doing some small and big thinking and shopping for my ultimate NA RB20 fetish.

So far I have:

- Tomei solid lifter kit
- Tomei valve springs
- Tomei procam intake 270deg  9,25mm lift
- Tomei procam exhaust 260deg 9,25mm lift
- Adjustable cam pulleys
- Crank collar
- Kevlar belt
- 1,0mm head gasket + OEM gasket kit

Plus some proper wizardry to bottom end:

- Modified Renault connecting rod with 128mm end-to-end distance
- Suzuki GSXR pistons 13,0 CR

Plus on intake:

- 2x GSXR 750 ITB's (42mm) to be modified for 6 cyl

And bits and pieces from new cam cover bolts to woodruf keys etc. etc.


Sooooo... I have been looting for parts over several years and I don't anymore think about the cost of this monstrosity. Basically my aim has become to replicate Triumph Speed Triple 1050cc engine in staight-6 form. Engine geometry is shockingly similar with Triumph and half of RB20. My displacement will be 2100cc with 80mm pistons. My rod/stroke ratio will be at some 1,8 and I will lose 200g weight from moving components per cylinder, so 1,2kg moving mass in total. Plus whatever they need to machine away for balancing. CR will be something between 10 and 11 (RB has more CC in head than Gixxer), but I might need to bump it up by machining the head. Trying to set intake cam for power band target and adjust exhaust cam for feasible overlap for NA. I might have to go for GTR cams later if these are "too mild".

The head will be the last big question mark in the build, mainly its flow. I will go with stock valves just for sake of minor cost reduction to avoid going bankcrupt. Some serious porting is needed. But the aim will be 240hp+ in NA at ~8500 rpm or so. I still need harmonic balancer, shims for valves and ECU. And of course all the fabricating of intake and exhaust. Plus balancing and machining.

I must have lost my mind to do all this for such small engine, but it's all-in at this point.

At least there is no other like it in the world lol... plz help...
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962193
Share on other sites

I should have bottom end experiencing 1.5 times the load at 10.000 rpm compared to stock parts at 7200 rpm. Let's see where the redline sets, but I think bottom end will be just fine with main journal girdle and the fact it can take 400 hp in stock form turbo. I'm more worried about the head and stock valves, what kind of acceleration they experience during high revs. To have peak power in 8500 I should be able to rev it to 9500 just for sake of power band. Otherwise I need to lower my expectations overall.

One thing to consider also is that RB has 45deg angle between intake and exhaust valves in head, and by my limited research online the particular Gixxer has 40deg angle, so there is a valid risk my valve clearances to piston need to be plenty. Gixxer also has 28.5mm intake valves compared to 30mm of RB20 so I really hope aftermarket pistons have extra diameter in valve pockets to accommodate possible oversized valves.

With this conrod-piston combo, deck height is exactly the same as stock RB. But reduced piston and connecting rod weight, and longer rod will be easier on piston acceleraton and load. Rod is H-beam.

Not going to be ready anytime soon, but some day

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962194
Share on other sites

Any RB at 10k RPM will sound sensational however we all know RBs aren't the world's smoothest inline 6 either (let's face it, it's no Yamaha 1JZ or 2JZ) so the harmonics will be a fun thing to combat.

The ITBs would definitely add a fantastic soundtrack!

Very interested in the final product, good luck!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962196
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2022 at 4:02 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Any RB at 10k RPM will sound sensational however we all know RBs aren't the world's smoothest inline 6 either (let's face it, it's no Yamaha 1JZ or 2JZ) so the harmonics will be a fun thing to combat.

The ITBs would definitely add a fantastic soundtrack!

Very interested in the final product, good luck!

What harmonics in particular? I don't know too much about what happens at 10k RPM for these engines.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962197
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2022 at 7:45 AM, joshuaho96 said:

What harmonics in particular?

Standard torsional harmonics as per every straight 6. Toyota/Yamaha just do a much better job of other aspects of the fundamental engine balance and oil pump drive and harmonic balancer integration and so on than Nissan did. The RB is a bit of a grandfathers axe, having its roots back in the 60s.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962198
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2022 at 5:01 PM, GTSBoy said:

Standard torsional harmonics as per every straight 6. Toyota/Yamaha just do a much better job of other aspects of the fundamental engine balance and oil pump drive and harmonic balancer integration and so on than Nissan did. The RB is a bit of a grandfathers axe, having its roots back in the 60s.

Yeah, I'm just curious as to the specific elements that are worse on the RB and whether those are fixable. I know about the oil pump drive but the other parts I'm fuzzy on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962201
Share on other sites

It is known RBs don't like big rpms, however that's probably more to do with the factory crank and how they're balanced. A stroker or modified factory crank (knife edged, balanced, etc.) would not have the same flaws (characteristics? LOL) as a factory oil pump assassinating crank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962202
Share on other sites

On 17/03/2022 at 10:14 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

It is known RBs don't like big rpms, however that's probably more to do with the factory crank and how they're balanced. A stroker or modified factory crank (knife edged, balanced, etc.) would not have the same flaws (characteristics? LOL) as a factory oil pump assassinating crank

Yes absolutely. My Nitto 2.8 full counter weight billet crank came with a balancing report that it was tested to 10000rpm, and Nitto rate the 2.8 kit to 11krpm. The 2.7 kit interestingly is rated to 12krpm.

The 2.8 billet crank weighs substantially more than the factory item too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7962253
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hey all, thinking about letting go of my RB20 Neo that i have had tucked away for future projects in the shed for a long time. Removed from R34 with 46xxxkm on it, it is the cleanest used engine i have ever seen. Had not a single bit of rust or corrosion on it and the zinc plating was on every single bolt.

Unfortunately 'future projects' look to be infinitely located in the future so i really have no need for it any more.

Thought i would let people in here know as this is about the only thread in existance that talks about these things haha. If its not appropriate admin feel free to remove.

Located Newcastle NSW happy to post pics if admin approves.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268302-rb20-neo/page/5/#findComment-7967590
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...