Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Top job at the railway crossing/dip think you were one out of only three cars that kept it pinned through there and the only car that produced sparks :thumbsup:

pics of said sparks? Gotta thank the Penske's for that, they handle big bumps like that with no problems

Now the car has been in a big event, I thought I better post some findings about the car.

1) You need a decent sump! From the datalogs, the oil pressure will constantly drop into the 0-5psi range under heavy braking (cornering and acceleration forces don't bother it). It only does it for less than a second at a time, but as we found out, you're driving a time bomb.

2) Spending money on good shocks was worth every cent. We probably only tuned the car 70%-80% of what it could be, but the way the shocks handeled the big bumps really surprised me. Coming from the Bilsteins in the GT-R (which I was happy with), it was in another leage.

3) airbox and radiator worked like a dream. Intake temps were only 10-15deg above ambient. And the coolent never got above 85deg on a stage, you could see the thermostat opening and closing from the datalogs. As the temp woudl go from 85 down to 78, then back up to 85 2-3 times over a 30km stage.

4) Fancy dash was worth the money. The data from the logs was invaluable during the event, and I found the dash clear and easy to read during the stages. If you're racing you will spend just as much money on gauges as a dash.

5) ITB have plusses and minuses. They have given the same effect as bigger cams, with a loss of power down low, but it does keep the power going right to 8000rpm (and beyond if you had the turbo for it). I personly hate the throttle responce from the std 20, I think it makes gear changes slower (waiting for the engine to rev down so the box will engage the next gear), and it makes the engine feel like it's attached directly to your foot. I'm going to try some cam gears, and hopfully that will give me some responce back..... but if I didn't need to drop the rev's back to 7000rpm from 8000rpm, I don't think it would have been as much of an issue. I don't think I'd recomend it for other people, but I personly think they improved the entire package.

6) catch can design needs more thought than just hooking a single tank up. Constant high rpm needs oil restrictors, oil air separator, thicker oil, and a return to the sump.

I'm suprised re the oil surge Benny. Mine did about 10,000klm of competetive driving before a big end went, but I'm blaming that on running 30 odd 100% pace laps in a Qld summer without an oil cooler! lol

Do.did you run a litre overfull?

I run it to the top of the hump of the dip stick, I think it's about a litre if not more. It seems all 20's will eventually run a bearing, just not as soon as mine.

We pulled the engine down last night, and bearing 3 was the one that died.

Yeah ABS works well, it's 4 channel unit out of a VY Commodore with traction control (tc isn't hooked up though). Idely it'd be nicer if it was slightly less sensitive, but you only really notice that on a circuit.

thought id post up some pics we got before and during targa

the day ben killed the engine.

DSC03999.jpg

DSC04000.jpg

DSC04004.jpg

This nissan flag poped up at least once every day during the event and was usualy acompanied with a toot of the horn and a bit of drift.

DSC04024.jpg

Stopped in queenstown. just one of the many stops through out targa

DSC04011.jpg

checking results. Gotta keep on your game

DSC04009.jpg

Belt up bitches

DSC04019.jpg

DSC04017.jpg

And almost to the finish line. Pre finish team meet.

DSC04040.jpg

5 and a bit days of racing the car pulled up pretty good.

DSC04039.jpg

Im pretty confident you will see this team about again.

Did the service crew take the pic of the Nissan flag?

didn't upload the pics of the car when it was waiting on Bradshaw bridge to tackle Arrowsmith.

I've got a new high responce bottom end ready to go. Just need to bash some restrictors into it, and sort a sump out. ASR looks the go for the sump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...