Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey everyone,

if anyone could post up who has the known !! quickest drag time on this forumn using an actual skyline chassis. not the motor in another car.

this is to prove my bro that there is cars on here that are quicker then the cars on his supra forum.

he said there are 9 sec street legal supras ( goodd dammmn hella quik lol )

so is there anyone out there that is quiker ?? is it street legal ??

plz help me out here guys. and im sure everyone would like to know

from the research iv done on the forums so far, it hink DirtGarage is the quickest.

thanks in advance guys

chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281393-who-has-the-fastest-skyline-on-sau/
Share on other sites

No 9sec cars are street legal mate.

If you mean cars that are "registered" then i would say the Dirtman is up there, but im not even sure that is registered anymore?

There are alot of high 10sec cars here on the forum.

But seriously i do not see the point of this thread.

Tell your brother RBs rule and thats that.

(2Js are awesome though)

I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

Mines still a street car...good for the occasional sunday cruise.

Edited by DiRTgarage
I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

in the 8's ??? wow thats awesome.. didnt think they would be in the 8's

id really like to find out the quickest one its got me very curious

thanks for that duncan

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

faster than my PB...thats what i aim for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

Edited by DiRTgarage
faster than my PB...thats what i am for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

damn.. thats awesome, must be a huge adrenlarin rush lol

thanks alot for that paul. in 5 mins i have proved my bro wrong hahaha

LOL that's an hilarious screen cap. Such a lame warning sign. Would also like to know what sensor (MAP?) was telling the computer that specifically the manifold was damaged lol. I guess it had to fit in with the warnings from earlier scenes about using NOS.

Now me and the mad scientist gotta rip apart the block and replace the piston rings you fried. OOOOOOOHHHH!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...