Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey everyone,

if anyone could post up who has the known !! quickest drag time on this forumn using an actual skyline chassis. not the motor in another car.

this is to prove my bro that there is cars on here that are quicker then the cars on his supra forum.

he said there are 9 sec street legal supras ( goodd dammmn hella quik lol )

so is there anyone out there that is quiker ?? is it street legal ??

plz help me out here guys. and im sure everyone would like to know

from the research iv done on the forums so far, it hink DirtGarage is the quickest.

thanks in advance guys

chris.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/281393-who-has-the-fastest-skyline-on-sau/
Share on other sites

No 9sec cars are street legal mate.

If you mean cars that are "registered" then i would say the Dirtman is up there, but im not even sure that is registered anymore?

There are alot of high 10sec cars here on the forum.

But seriously i do not see the point of this thread.

Tell your brother RBs rule and thats that.

(2Js are awesome though)

I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

Mines still a street car...good for the occasional sunday cruise.

Edited by DiRTgarage
I'm sure there is someone on here that can be more specific....but

Paul (dirtgarage) has the quickest silver car with low mount turbos. It hasn't run in its new spec yet

Mark Berry's r32 ran quickest with low mount turbos

There are a couple of owners on here with skylines in the 8s....not sure who is the fastest today so I'll leave it to someone who knows

in the 8's ??? wow thats awesome.. didnt think they would be in the 8's

id really like to find out the quickest one its got me very curious

thanks for that duncan

Giant is quickest...till the end of the month.

crosses dirty fingers

EDIT: forgot about...markr34gtr...he is...7.84.

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

7.8 :) omg !!!

is that the quickest time ?? hahaha man thats crazyy

and paul what time are u aiming for after you get it back ??

faster than my PB...thats what i aim for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

Edited by DiRTgarage
faster than my PB...thats what i am for each time i take it out...should run around 9.40's at 29psi. Once i can consistently get it down the track we will give it some more boost and if required NOS and go for 8's.

damn.. thats awesome, must be a huge adrenlarin rush lol

thanks alot for that paul. in 5 mins i have proved my bro wrong hahaha

LOL that's an hilarious screen cap. Such a lame warning sign. Would also like to know what sensor (MAP?) was telling the computer that specifically the manifold was damaged lol. I guess it had to fit in with the warnings from earlier scenes about using NOS.

Now me and the mad scientist gotta rip apart the block and replace the piston rings you fried. OOOOOOOHHHH!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...