Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone remember MS accusing David Coulthard of trying to kill him at Spa years ago? I know it was a long time ago but still, fairly rich of MS to say something like that and then pull an even worse stunt on Barrichello

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

It was a zoo in pitlane so who really knows. I happen to think that he saw the Renault coming and forgot in the heat of the moment that Renault were the next garage up...i think he assumed the car was going through and had already stopped. ??! But who knows, could be that silly, Renault have been next to them all year

How can you say it was a boring race? Even if you werent a Webber fan, different strategy, a penalty meaning one of the quickest cars had to race for position. But the chess game of lap after lap trying to pull that advantage was great viewing. Whether it was Webber, Massa or Vettle....it was graeat viewing. Seeing Rubens have a blast for the last few laps....i thoughts there was plenty to watch...a good GP

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

I was thinking the exact same thing!

book it into your calendar

i wonder if they will just get a slap on the wrist. I dont mind team orders it makes sense. I thonk it will be hard to prove it was a team order rather than massa using his brain and supporting the team. I think ferrari will say they gave massa the info and let him make up his mind.

Good to see ferrari closing the gap will be interesting to see how close they are at spa

loving the webber leap! reminds me of the schuey leap and it didn't hurt his win record! also reminds me of schuey 'conducting' the italian national anthem until some weiners took it the wrong way and got all upset about it so he stopped. fun police strike again! they can't deny it's a jaunty little tune. :D

ive been watching the pitlane incident over and over and cant help but think that the renault lollypop man saw the wheel off rosbergs car coming and moved, which accidently released his driver into the path of the force india. might just be the camera angle but it all happened at the same time.

Apparently that's what happened, supposedly he was distracted. I don't mean to sound harsh but isn't it the job of the lollipop guy to not be distracted, even when it's crazy? I'm not saying it's easy but he's the one who's trusted to keep his head in those situations.

lol. word :/

he is certainly getting the height to get the job done on the little bastard.

Can you just imagine it? Webber *accidentally* clips Vettel, Vettel goes ape-poo, a punch-on breaks out resulting in Vettel going off the balcony WWE-style.

I disagree. The Schublocker is quite capable of running over a nun and claiming that he had to do it because she was on the racing line, or whatever he defines as the racing line. I was quite surprised that he did apologise because I've seen him righteously defend all sorts of crap over the years. I don't recall him apologising for anything (at least voluntarily) before. Maybe he's mellowing in his old age. Or maybe he's afraid of payback from Rubens. THAT I would pay much to see.

He knows the rules. Or at least you'd think He should

Pretty weak how He initially says- "I'm allowed to change line once in defence", completely ignoring the other rule about not 'crowding cars to the edge of the track'

Most ppl have probably read on PF1 by now about how if there'd been enough time in the race to review the video evidence, Mike would have been black flagged

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...