Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yup. miss that thing already :unsure:

on that note, was talking to a chick on teh cellular phone. my mates getting sus, im like, lols tims getting sus about this

her: oh whut does he think im your mrs?

me: yer

her: oh lollzz i probably will be mohsen, dont you think

me: probably not

her: ohh...

motherf**ker. she barred me on saturday for that >_<

Nah the laws of hard ball will always apply IMO, the only thing that changes is the words/language you use. He's doing it the right way...not telling them to f**k off, but suggesting they put more on the table because he's not quite enticed yet.

1968 was treat em green (weed) keep em keen.

Nah the laws of hard ball will always apply IMO, the only thing that changes is the words/language you use. He's doing it the right way...not telling them to f**k off, but suggesting they put more on the table because he's not quite enticed yet.

1968 was treat em green (weed) keep em keen.

This. Keeping in mind the phonecall one was supposed to be my +1 to the movies n shit. You know, I know she wants meh, she knows i want her, but just gotta let her know Shes going too quick.

Also, valentines day. Told her I'll pick her up from school and well go somewhere. Never even left home. She waited for ages.

And still all lovey dovey to me. *insert troll face*

And I literally punched a bitch in the mouth once.

Even when you treat them well they tell you to get f**ked

Zactly. For some girls (read: many), knowing that you want them is sufficient for their ego. *insert big empty space here, where the need to sleep with you for validation used to be...soon to be replaced by the act of masturbation*. Of course it does require them to find you acceptably attractive in the first place...but even if they don't, you can still fill a girl with sweet insecurity and try your luck at that?

P.S. agree with Jez, Moh...unless she took a shot at your nuts, in which case, open season on her face...don't be hittin them :domokun:

*insert big empty space here, where the need to sleep with you for validation used to be*.

On a side note to this..

My mum gave me a massive lecture the other night about sleeping with girls that I'm not dating. I tried to explain the concept of casual sex to her but she is absolutely insistent that the girls are doing it only to impress me, and that they're looking for a relationship.

Do you think this could be the case? The girls tell me they're dtf, but I guess women are always hard to read.

This. Keeping in mind the phonecall one was supposed to be my +1 to the movies n shit. You know, I know she wants meh, she knows i want her, but just gotta let her know Shes going too quick.

Also, valentines day. Told her I'll pick her up from school and well go somewhere. Never even left home. She waited for ages.

And still all lovey dovey to me. *insert troll face*

And I literally punched a bitch in the mouth once.

did everyone else miss that?

Depends on the girl and the situation / what is said between the parties. Some girls use it as a trap to try and get a relationship out of you (in the same way that a guy will use a relationship to get sex out of a girl)...some are genuinely after just a good time...

...some misread you totally, thinking that you proposed to them that night and have every intention of spending the rest of your life with them:

Zactly. For some girls (read: many), knowing that you want them is sufficient for their ego. *insert big empty space here, where the need to sleep with you for validation used to be...soon to be replaced by the act of masturbation*. Of course it does require them to find you acceptably attractive in the first place...but even if they don't, you can still fill a girl with sweet insecurity and try your luck at that?

Huh? I just wanted to post the forever alone guy :mellow: But i do agree, "treat 'em mean" still has some merit

did everyone else miss that?

No. Mohsen is 18, it's ok for him to be preyin' on school bitches. Let's not discuss that old chestnut again!

Birds, I think you're right about that relationship trap. So many girls have tried that on me, and I never took a bar of it.

I think it's male-nature to lead them on a bit if they're playing that game, but I force myself not to do that. It's not worth all the bullshit involved.

Edited by jezza boii
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...