Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For a single entry that is very impressive.

(looks at T51R) :ermm:

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Man the precision turbos appear to be the best bang for the buck. I know EFR and VGT are newer but you can't deny living proof!

FP HTA are very real competition, the 6466 is a particularly good offering however - but from FP you have the "rest" of the awesome turbos. Some of the best value for money turbos I could think of for small/medium sized engines in order would be (some real rough and realistic E85 power ranges):

FP GT3076R HTA - For 330-380kw @ wheels

FP GT3582R HTA - For 370-450kw @ wheels

FP GT3586R HTA - For 430-500kw @ wheels

Precision PT6466 CEA - For 500-600kw @ wheels (basically it just seems to do so much so well!!)

FP Super 94 HTA - For 580-680kw @ wheels (same as above - but larger scale)

Those are my favourite considering price, reliability, fitment, spool and power.

the 6466 is popular with the Supra fans so there are some results for 3.0L motors but results on the RB26 are pretty hard to find. The general consensus from what I read was don't bother with the 6766 as the 6466 is so damn good and punches above it's weight.

Our set up still has more in it, I've heard these turbos love 35psi+ so when we get it to hold spark we will go back on the dyno to see how it goes.

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

I'm not 100% sure yet, but one thing I am not sure of is if someone puts one on a high flowing RB (ie, RB30 with aggressive headwork and cams) if they will flow enough per psi to keep the big engine happy - they seem to be keen on high pressure ratios for their power, but that might just be the cars they've been on so far. Thats the only reservation I have at all, and it may not be justified.

Yep I reckon the PT6466 CEA is Precision's best moment, it basically always seems to deliver - the better the setup, the crazier the result. Looking forward to Scr48's result... should drive very nicely on a 3litre and obviously the potential is there for massive power, even the .84 will make a lot but if it ends up not being enough then going to a 1.15 hotside would allow for unrestrained silliness :)

You and me both! Hopefully Friday!

Capacity: 2.6L

Comp ratio: Standard

Cams: HKS step 1's 272 8.7 lift (I think)

Exhaust: 4" dump into custom 3.5" exhaust with no mufflers

Will be tuned on E85 from the drum, the car is not my daily anymore and for $2,50/L I don't have to worry about watching the fuel prices jump up and down.

Because I'm not sticking with RB26 and don't wanna upgrade ECU's again.

Will utilize some of the additional channels from the PS2000 in the future.

A couple of people have also asked why the Logger IQ3, it's for same reason. buying now to setup so I don't have to replace in the future.

My aim is just to have a bit more poke when I press the accelerator down, I'm not chasing a power figure nor am I looking for a world record.

So finally got around to getting my car sorted, only to run into more problems.

I ended up with a Platinum Pro BNR34 specific model, and 3.5" dump not a 4"

Everything else above was fitted and turns out should've updated the valve springs too, thinking the 272 drop in cams would be ok with stock valve springs.

After a problem with the CAS & Valve float when you add any boost the car will be getting some supertech springs & possibly a Ross trigger kit and heading back for more boost.

What I ended up with was 494hp @ 13.5psi

I'll post up the dyno sheet later tonight when I get home and take it out of the car.

Another upgrade I will look at will be updating the coils or fitting a CDI & pencil coil kit

The 6262 sounds great, spools hard but I can't wait to get some boost into it.

The goal is still 20psi, I have no real power figure aim but judging on what it made @ 13.5psi its gonna go close to or over 600hp quite easily.

I'll keep everyone posted,

Cheers

Noy

Took a snap of the graph from the 6466 on the RB26 that JEM tuned the other month.

Soooo much midrange for the power output.

1380269364291.jpg

That is crazy, still 2.6?

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Paul, I hope you are going to plot this for reference :)

I've done a quick eye plot ;)

I'd love to drive it. Dyno only tells half the story.

Errr and I sold those exact turbo which I was gonna put on my own car :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...