Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, burn4005 said:

its interesting that the Precisions seem to be happy well past the flow the manufacturer rates the compressor for. whereas Borg Warner made their turbines strong enough to cope with the choke speed of the compressor they paired it with and not much more as its outside the design parameters.

They just quote some arbitrary hp number which annoys me no end, if you run a "705hp" Precision turbo on a diesel engine you are not going to make anywhere NEAR that power - though if you remove that turbo and then put it on a serious engine running "FTW Black" race fuel you could end up making 900-1000hp - yet on both engines it could have been completely at choke flow.  

Even "lb/min" really is a slightly crap rating for air flow, the whole "corrected gas flow" thing is all well and good when Borg Warner, Garrett, Holset etc all use different standards for defining what mass air flow is moved in whatever conditions.  

Just looking for a bit of guidance,

I have a built rb26 forged bottom end stock piston size nur block.

Head is very ported 1mm over size valves

276 degree cam shafts billet

Vct custom cam set up off a rb25

hypertune plenum 

6 boost manifold 6266 gen2 pricision turbo,.Large enough fuel system to run e85

Just looking for where i would be at power wise i don t really want to run 40 psi or any thing as its a street car, I had around 480 awhp with my hks 25/30 twin turbo setup on a stock motor that threw a ring lan at powercruise a few years ago. I liked the response alot used to chop alot more powerfull cars due to response and grip.

 

Any one done this combo and have graphs or any idea where abouts id be at.

Boost is nearly irrelevant. Its timing and tuning. How much is blown out the exhaust @what deg. Of timing, manifold backpressures ect ect. You could theoretically run 100psi safely if the cam,crank,ignition and injection timing was to suit. Dont be afraid to run boost with these turbos. Ive found the couple ive had anything to do with like to be in the mid to high 30s or even 40s. 

17 hours ago, Gtir-keiron said:

rb26 forged bottom end stock piston size.

Head is very ported 1mm over size valves

276 degree cam shafts billet

Vct custom cam set up off a rb25

6 boost manifold 6266 gen2 pricision turbo,. e85

Just looking for where i would be at power wise

Turbine housing will be the deciding factor on your power figure, and response.  Eg. single scroll 0.84 will be way different from split pulse 1.15.

If you're limiting yourself to 2 bar, could range from 450 - 550kW.  Your rpm ceiling will also play a part in that figure. So there's a few variables.

 

The first and most obvious difference is complexity and cost.  Packaging/engineering difficulties being part of that situation.

The second and less easy to quantify with a dyno sheet is throttle feel and how it drives into boost or how it behaves on gear changes etc (different from how it runs at WOT).

Otherwise, the power figure will (should) be higher with a bigger housing simply because the engine can exhale more efficiently, lower backpressure, better scavenging, less retained heat etc etc. 

There are reasons to go with either approach, and quite a few traps that can prevent "best" outcome for each.

I'm currently engineering a 6266 0.8 single scroll 6boost setup onto a basic 30DET engine.  Knowing that engine performance is only a part of what makes the car go fast.

  • Like 2
4 hours ago, Dale FZ1 said:

Turbine housing will be the deciding factor on your power figure, and response.  Eg. single scroll 0.84 will be way different from split pulse 1.15.

If you're limiting yourself to 2 bar, could range from 450 - 550kW.  Your rpm ceiling will also play a part in that figure. So there's a few variables.

 

Its .84

split pulse manifold

  • 3 weeks later...

can anyone tell me where the best deals are being done on a 6466 nowadays?

I am wanting to try a 6466 on our engine and see if it makes more power than the 6766 we currently have fitted to it.

Would a 6466 with a .8 rear make over 500rwkw? The 6766 is a 1.0 rear, T4 split pulse on a genuine GReddy exhaust manifold.

The car is tuned by Unirgroup and is currently making 460/480rwkw at 30psi. Runs 138mph consistently

Wouldn't it be healthier to run the 6466 with the current 1.00 rear? It's such a large snail, don't stick a cork up its ass and run the peanut 0.84. In AND out!

Why is it "only" making 480 on 30 psi? Sounds kinda low given boost and turbo size. Possible issues/restrictions in the setup?

  • Like 1

curiosity more than anything mate. i am sure the ass end of both turbo's would be interchangeable so if the 6466 struggled too badly with a .8 ass we could throw the 1.0 on and do some more testing. 

As you can see in this post there are cars making more power with a smaller turbo though i am led to believe the 6766 isnt best suited to an RB which may be our issue. It flows a bit more air but doesnt like the rpm side of things. 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 8/9/2017 at 7:12 AM, SRS13 said:

I haven't posted the results of my 6466 on a SR22VET.

On the JEM dyno, it made 512rwk on 34psi with 34psi on board at 4300rpm (from memory).

Haven't run it at the creek yet.

Got a Dyno grpah?

Anyone used the PTE 6062 Gen 2 yet? I'm currently converting from Sr20det to Vet and seems to fit the bill nicely between the 58 and 62 series range, (Currently making 410rwkw on a 5858)

Kinda surprising the Gen 2 6062 is rated 50hp higher than the Gen 1 6262

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pressure when IDLING, is meant to be 51PSi... So that amperage value needs to go up a fair chunk... I'd personally be factoring for more like 12amp at least on those runs, and at that point you need to hope the already there wiring doesn't drop you a volt or two, as that's a lot of fuel pressure flow drop off from 13.5 to 12V! Taking idle pressure of 51psi, means the pump will be drawing a MINIMUM of 9amps all the time based on your reading of the graph (3bar base, then allowing an extra 0.5bar for boost = roughly 51psi)
    • Hi all,  I am in the market for an R200 longnose diff out of a Z31 300ZX, or S12 RSX, DR30 skyline, or similar, in a 3.9 ratio.  Preferably a late model one with the M12 crownwheel bolts.  The only easy to find advert for one of these was my ad back in 2007 when I sold it on this forum.  I sold the diff as I had sold the car it goes to, but as it turns out, after 18 years I got the car back late last year, so now I'm looking for the diff !  If anyone knows where to find a longnose R200 LSD with the M12 crownwheel bolts, drop me a line at [email protected] - Bonus paid if soomeone comes up with the original diff (stranger things have happened !).  Cheers   Ben D    
    • Hi everyone, I used to post here a bit from 2004-2013, when I owned various Nissans, in particular my S12 RSX gazelle, which was sold in 2007.  As luck would have it, after an 18 year hiatus, the car found its way back to me last year, and over the past 11 months I have had the pleasure of restoring it with my kids.  One thing that I am after in particular is a 3.9 ratio R200 LSD for it.  I actually sold the one out of the car here back in 2007 , and it would be incredible if I could track down who I sold it to, so I can see how they have progressed over the years (and to be honest, to see whether I can get the diff back !).  Anyways, hi all and let me know "where are the R200 Longnose diffs all at these days ?  Cheers Ben D  
    • Arms will be the same as the G35 or 350Z, but as above, there was a change in the lower control arm where it connects to the ball joint.  That said, you can remove the ball joint cone from your old ball joints and fit them to the new ball joints.  To be honest, I didn't think the ball joints themselves were different. The main ball joint is a bit awkward to replace, you really need to remove the steering knuckle to press out the old one.  Some people have used tools to remove it in place, but it just seemed too hard to get to. If you are going to press out/in that ball joint, then you may as well just replace the bushings in the LCA and the compression rod.  You can buy the compression rod bushing from Nissan, but the LCA bushes, you will need to go aftermarket. Much cheaper than buying the whole arm.
    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
×
×
  • Create New...