Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Griffin said:

Is that comparable to efr7670  /gt3576 ?

Impeller sizing on the PTE 5862 is very similar to the EFR 7670.

GTX 3576 runs a smaller turbine.

You'd think "broadly" comparable units, but they will all perform a little differently whether in-gear response, max flow, or boost recovery on gear changes.  Housing options in all cases would make a huge difference on those performance measures.

I'll be watching for results/impressions on the 5862.  V band turbine inlet, very nice :)

10 minutes ago, SiR_RB said:

Precision just released a new turbo model at sema,

7275 gen2, hopefuly start seeing some results shortly

At the 1000+hp mark, going to need something to stop it sucking the seagulls in!!

What application do you reckon Michael? - Strap one to a GTR and go Flying 500 at WTAC 2018, Snowy 1000 etc?

 

 

  • 3 months later...
4 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

6262 still going strong. Makes very similar power on Mainline and Dynapack

20180228_170355.jpg

Bloody hell.  Mainline hub I'm assuming?

Either way, huge result - I know this might be a silly question and I don't mean to be a dick by asking it but I'm just interested in knowing your thoughts... are you 100% sure this isn't a 6266?  There are plenty of people making less than this with 6266s and even 6466s :O

2 hours ago, Lithium said:

Bloody hell.  Mainline hub I'm assuming?

Either way, huge result - I know this might be a silly question and I don't mean to be a dick by asking it but I'm just interested in knowing your thoughts... are you 100% sure this isn't a 6266?  There are plenty of people making less than this with 6266s and even 6466s

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

1 hour ago, azzada1 said:

Was that at the dyno day simon or private tune? I recall a softer ramp rate being talked about to help a certain au for the dyno day so just curious.. excellent result for the 62mm either way

Just did it yesterday, funnily enough a Falcon with 1100hp had just come off with a ramp rate that made my car sound like it was in 1st gear. We extended the ramp rate to a much more appropriate level 

  • Like 1
44 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

Just did it yesterday, funnily enough a Falcon with 1100hp had just come off with a ramp rate that made my car sound like it was in 1st gear. We extended the ramp rate to a much more appropriate level 

Glad you got where I was coming from - was definitely not trying to be a hater or anything, just thinking through everything and I was fairly sure there was a decent chance the same thought process may have gone through your head too. 

I was pretty sure you'd mentioned the spool was pretty decent and that definitely seems good considering the kind of spool vs power that people used to put up with.  This is a .84a/r hotside eh?  What diff ratio do you have?

Here is a 4.3x drive ratio in 4th gear doing a similar pull with a 1.00a/r 6466 with purely wastegate spring boost control at 1bar (so 1bar happens later than it might with electronic boost targetting an appropriate boost level) and considering how much bigger it should be than a .84 6262 it doesn't necessarily look THAT much laggier.  

Could look at it that it's time for a 6466? ;)  You can see in the preview shot that it's already touching 10psi by 4000rpm and swinging up hard before the gate cracks

 

 

 

 

Edited by Lithium
46 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Glad you got where I was coming from - was definitely not trying to be a hater or anything, just thinking through everything and I was fairly sure there was a decent chance the same thought process may have gone through your head too. 

I was pretty sure you'd mentioned the spool was pretty decent and that definitely seems good considering the kind of spool vs power that people used to put up with.  This is a .84a/r hotside eh?  What diff ratio do you have?

Here is a 4.3x drive ratio in 4th gear doing a similar pull with a 1.00a/r 6466 with purely wastegate spring boost control at 1bar (so 1bar happens later than it might with electronic boost targetting an appropriate boost level) and considering how much bigger it should be than a .84 6262 it doesn't necessarily look THAT much laggier.  

Could look at it that it's time for a 6466? ;)  You can see in the preview shot that it's already touching 10psi by 4000rpm and swinging up hard before the gate cracks

 

 

 

 

0.84 and 4.11

Looking at logs I get 10psi in 1st at 4200 and 2nd at 3800

I've got a 15psi spring in my gate so I can potentially turn off my Mac valve and do a very similar run to that but on first looks it's a fair bit laggier. Assume it's a 2.6L?

 

Edited by SimonR32
7 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

I've got a 15psi spring in my gate so I can potentially do a very similar run to that but on first looks it's a fair bit laggier

That'd be interesting for academia's sake but I believe you - there definitely should be a fair difference between the 1.00 6466 and the .84 6262 :)  

It's a hard result to argue with, nice work!

2 minutes ago, Lithium said:

That'd be interesting for academia's sake but I believe you - there definitely should be a fair difference between the 1.00 6466 and the .84 6262 :)  

It's a hard result to argue with, nice work!

Will grab some logs tonight. Because of the PPG 6 speed mine will sit almost dead inbetween between 4th and 5th compared to 4th in 4.3 so I'll do both and post average.

Should be interesting on weekend at Racewars, have 1000m run and I'm guessing I'll pick up a lot of speed from the sequential box. Best guess is around the 295km/hr region 

5 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Yep, Mainline hub... First time using it, cool bit of kit and very consistent.

Funny you should ask (and I'm not insulted), I just mentioned to my mate who does a lot of work on the car yesterday how I wonder if somehow they managed to chuck a 6262 sticker on a bigger turbo. It's rated at 705hp but has done 766hp on a Dynapack with the correct correction and now 771hp on a Mainline hub. So god knows... In saying that I can't see it really being any bigger because it's making 15psi by under 4000rpm on the road in 1:1 ratio.

 

That dyno run puts a smile on your face, i watched it several times lol, what boost was that at?

Its funny how precision rate the power of the turbos, when i spoke with them they said compressor maps cost too much to produce so they use real world figures.

I went through the process with them and they spec the 5862 for my car which they rate at 700hp. Obviously uses the same size turbine as the 6262 but has a smaller 58-76mm compressor instead of 62-82mm.

Had been hoping to have mine together by now but its still a little way off, hopefully soon though

20180106_101538_resized.thumb.jpg.48bfe36122d1a610f507180c6fa7ee75.jpg

7 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Will grab some logs tonight. Because of the PPG 6 speed mine will sit almost dead inbetween between 4th and 5th compared to 4th in 4.3 so I'll do both and post average.

300rpm better in the shorter 4th and more like 500-600rpm better in the longer 5th. From experience that would make a big difference to driveability.

10 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Video of the run, about 8 sec by the looks

20180228_165754_1.mp4

Sounds yummy :) Great result!

Where are you getting it tuned these days? Need to find somewhere decent to go once I finish building my house and get my car back from storage.

3 hours ago, NEO25T said:

That was the turbo i picked until precision steered me to the 5862.

There was a 4 door r34 in the for sale section with the 6062 recently 407kw e85 25psi

Found it ? it even came off the same dyno as mine 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...