Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ever wondering if your speedo is accurate?

So far Ive been in 2x Stagea's (mine and a mates) and both speedo's were out by 10%.

So for every 10km/h on the clock it was out by 1km/h...

Note: This was with FACTORY Spec Tyre Dimentions + Factory Alloys.

Ie: 10Km/h(clock) = 9km/h(Real Time) & 110km/h(clock) = 100km/h(Real Time)

I noticed when I used to hit Speed Cut at 180km/h.. Navman would be Register 170km/h.

Someone once told me that Nissan did this so you didnt speed? and its only till 100km/h(Real Time)

as very few free/highways exceed this speed.

Cheers, Aerron

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327028-speedo-calibration/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Most cars speedometers - not just Nissans - will err on the side of over-reading (reading higher than the road-speed).

From what I understand, speedometer accuracy is a tricky business for car manufacters. They need to allow for things like:

* Tyre wear

* Tyre temperature

* Variations in factory-released tyre rim sizes in a single model (where all models share the same speedometer and sensor)

As soon as you start introducing non-factory components like aftermarket rims & changes in the overall diameter of the wheel (different tyre profiles, widths, etc) you introduce even more variables that may affect your speedometer accuracy. The manufacturer will typically provide a tyre placard which lists acceptable tyre rim/tyre sizes for your car - it's up to the owner to ensure that they keep the rolling diameter as close to this as possible to try and avoid upsetting the speedometer accuracy. (Though there are state-by-state laws regarding how much the rolling diameter can be too).

There are regulations under the ADRs regarding speedometer accuracy. These have since changed in - I think - 2006 to be even more stringent, but for most of us it's still under the older rule that it must be accurate within +-10%. From what I recall, the new rules prevent any under-reading, and allow for over-reading of up to 4kph + 10%.

Testing against GPS, both of my cars over-read, but even at 100kph it's only 1-2kph out - so I don't stress too much.

Anyway, hope that helps :)

Most cars speedometers - not just Nissans - will err on the side of over-reading (reading higher than the road-speed).

From what I understand, speedometer accuracy is a tricky business for car manufacters. They need to allow for things like:

* Tyre wear

* Tyre temperature

* Variations in factory-released tyre rim sizes in a single model (where all models share the same speedometer and sensor)

As soon as you start introducing non-factory components like aftermarket rims & changes in the overall diameter of the wheel (different tyre profiles, widths, etc) you introduce even more variables that may affect your speedometer accuracy. The manufacturer will typically provide a tyre placard which lists acceptable tyre rim/tyre sizes for your car - it's up to the owner to ensure that they keep the rolling diameter as close to this as possible to try and avoid upsetting the speedometer accuracy. (Though there are state-by-state laws regarding how much the rolling diameter can be too).

There are regulations under the ADRs regarding speedometer accuracy. These have since changed in - I think - 2006 to be even more stringent, but for most of us it's still under the older rule that it must be accurate within +-10%. From what I recall, the new rules prevent any under-reading, and allow for over-reading of up to 4kph + 10%.

Testing against GPS, both of my cars over-read, but even at 100kph it's only 1-2kph out - so I don't stress too much.

Anyway, hope that helps :rofl:

I wasnt so much stressing, more so curious :)

You did bring up alot of good points...

My partner works for Toyota, she was telling me recently that all staff were warned that the new Tarago's speedo can be inaccurate by Approx 20km/h :) ... I was rather shocked.

Toyota... a leading manufacturer could be that far off. Fresh out of the box even?

But it is a Luck the Draw so 1-2% of the production could be wrong.

I bring this subject up as I went for a VERY EARLY Sunday Morning blat to stretch the Stag's legs out.

(Yes I know its dangerous to me and others etc... so smack me down if you will)

I was reading Navman's Speed as I did so, noticed that the Stags needle was above the Odometer(roughly 5 o'clock) and the Navman only said 190km/h... So I continued onto 205km/h.

I know using Nissan Consult you can re-calibrate a R33's Spedometer. Is it possible in the 34's/Stagea?

Cheers

Edited by JDM_Spirit

Mines out and over, 245/40R18 on 18x9.5' on RS4S (max std 215/50R17)

IE: needle - 110kmh pfc - 106kmh gps - 105kmh,

needle - 120kmh pfc - 114kmh gps - 113kmh

Power FC display is even different to needle but more accurate.

both of my stageas have over-read the speed. When the GPS reads 100km/h the speedo usually says about 108km/h.

Its a bit less than 10% but it means if I sit at 65km/h via the needle I'm actually doing about ~60km/h - most of the time i sit closer to 60...but the extra leeway has saved me from a fine more than once.

^^^^ This was on a private road... Right?
I should bloody well hope so!

:P ... Well.... technically I drove on a piece of My Road as part of my Tax and Rego paid for it.

Im running 17's with 500km old 235/45R17's.

GPS : 110km/h Needle = 117km/h ish

i would sit at

50 speedo , 45 real time.

90 speedo, 80 real time.

116 speedo , 100 real time.

so i couldnt work it out haha, sold the car the new owner put 20's on it and said its only like 3ks off now all round, according to his GPS

Pretty much all cars are set up to be out. Brand new camry's have the correct reading at the ECU but then change it for the speedo to be 10% out, don't ask me why, they just do. but it explains why camry drivers always seem to go so slow.

Mines out and over, 245/40R18 on 18x9.5' on RS4S (max std 215/50R17)

IE: needle - 110kmh pfc - 106kmh gps - 105kmh,

needle - 120kmh pfc - 114kmh gps - 113kmh

Power FC display is even different to needle but more accurate.

That's probably due to the extra stretch your tyres have made to go over the 9.5"rims, as I have exactly the same size tyres on my car, but on 18x8" rims, and it's only aout 1km/h out.

My PowerFC is way off both the speedo and actual real-time speed my car is travelling at.

with my ecutalk and gps i get 3 different speeds

the ecutalk over reads the ground speed and the dash shows more than that again

and as somone said, its pretty accurate up to about 80 (both dash and ecu are in sync) then they start to separate

anyone used the jaycar speed corrector kit?

8-10% over-read. Means it has more kms on the clock than it has done!

Mines out about 7%. Trip to work in my Magna is 114km and the Stagea is 122km. 18" Advant T7s with 225/45 with rolling diameter of 2072.5mm whereas standard is 215/55x17" so rolling diameter is 2099.5mm. So smaller by 27mm hence more km on the odometer.

Mines out about 7%. Trip to work in my Magna is 114km and the Stagea is 122km. 18" Advant T7s with 225/45 with rolling diameter of 2072.5mm whereas standard is 215/55x17"

I run 245/45/18 and my error is approx 3% against GPS, which I'm quite happy with. Where in the mountains are you Rosella? I'm at Faulconbridge, I'll have to keep my eyes peeled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...