Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

with a standard rb25 head, external gate

what is the max boost it should run?

what revs can I expect full boost?

about what power?

the workshop is recommending against another china turbo against my better judgement....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/329713-garret-3040-on-an-rb30/
Share on other sites

On a 2.5ltr i ran 17psi 270-280rwkw and it was on by 4000-4200rpm.

370rwkw on jungle juice @ 24psi... lots of room to move.

18-20psi with a 3ltr you should see ~330rwkw on PULP without a drama.

You'd take a rough guess it'll be on nicely around 3300-3500rpm with a 3ltr.

Lets see your china turbo do that you tightass accountant :thumbsup:

ive got a cheap china turbo on ny 30 atm (TO4e with a 0.62? rear) make 14psi by 2000 but then drops down to 10 as its physically chocking the exhaust. still makes 230rwkw at 10psi though.

im getting a GT35r for it now :thumbsup:

yeah china t04e is what I am running now. 260awkw @18psi. full boost at 2000. external gate, it holds boost perfectly all the way.

they break a lot which doesn't worry me...but the mechanic is trying to talk me into something more expensive.

hmmm. sounds like you done the same thing for the same reasone i have. its weird that urs is flowing fine, as my tuner had said boost issues with mine (using the ViPEC for EBC). My tuner is also the one pushing for a Garrett etc

conspiracy???

yeah china t04e is what I am running now. 260awkw @18psi. full boost at 2000. external gate, it holds boost perfectly all the way.

they break a lot which doesn't worry me...but the mechanic is trying to talk me into something more expensive.

try for a 3071?

a 3076 is seeing positive boost at 2000, so the 3071 should be better suited to your needs.

spend the money duncan by the time you replace your china turbos once a year you might as well have just bought a decent one :thumbsup:

spend the money duncan by the time you replace your china turbos once a year you might as well have just bought a decent one :ph34r:

pfft, 300 bucks and 30 min work. thats like 7 years worth :thumbsup:

spend the money duncan by the time you replace your china turbos once a year you might as well have just bought a decent one :)
pfft, 300 bucks and 30 min work. thats like 7 years worth :nyaanyaa:

yeah that's how the maths looks to me too....but I did commit to looking into something else. Strangely the turbo importer does not think they have to warrant the turbo when it fails ;)

Hi Duncan

I have one on the R33. You are welcome to try it out.

thanks mate....might do...standard capacity, head and cams right?

Get a GTT highflowed by Gcg that should do it.

I'll check out 3071 and hi flows I guess, maybe gtrs. I was assuming the hi flows and gtrs would be a little small on a 3l even for response, maybe not.

I wouldnt use a high flowed GTT turbo by GCG as the main benefit is the standard exterior for legal reasons. Sure its a reasonable turbo but for the cost of over $2k you can get a much better turbo.

I would be careful that you dont completely strangle the engine with a restrictive turbo, I wouldnt go any smaller than a 3071 on a 30. How bout a 3071 with 0.63 housing? That would be ridiculously responsive.

thanks mate....might do...standard capacity, head and cams right?

Standard RB25 cams etc (but HKS cast manifold). It would give you an idea of how it delivers power. Obviously the extra cubes is offset by the extra weight of the stagea so I would be a fairly close comparison.

I'll pm my number.

are you using a standard manifold??(exhaust) . i got a cheapy kkr 560 but was a rip off of one. im using an external gate (progate 45 mm on my 30)because the original one is opening at 20 psi. garret gt30/40's are now known as gt3082 .

Its got a china stainless zorst manifold and china front facing plenum as well.

From looking further there must be at least 2 or maybe 3 different turbos called 3040 because people mention .63 all the way to 1.02, and peak power ranges from 270 to 330. If I go one of these I'll make sure its the smallest one.

still looking into another china turbo too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...