Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OS Giken 3.0 litre kit for around the $20K mark. But there are bigger kits than this..........Spool was looking at a 3.2 and a 3.4 kit.
$20K!!!!

or Rb30 for $200 (or realistically $5 to $10k fully forged and balanced etc)

Charlie still has his apexi 2.9 kit for sale.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ra...B2-t285391.html

There is also some company out there that is de-stroking rb30 cranks to 83mm, running standard rb26 rods and custom pistons to make an RB29.

User 'Mark99' on this forum was the machinist that developed the stroker kit from memory. I cant remember what the company was called though.

Charlie still has his apexi 2.9 kit for sale.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ra...B2-t285391.html

There is also some company out there that is de-stroking rb30 cranks to 83mm, running standard rb26 rods and custom pistons to make an RB29.

User 'Mark99' on this forum was the machinist that developed the stroker kit from memory. I cant remember what the company was called though.

I think he worked for Rhemac in Adelaide.

the 3.2 and 3.4l kits by spool are for rb30 blocks not rb26

Yep, not sure if they will adapt to 4wd, but I'm pretty sure it has been done for the rb30. But I've got a funny idea that the 3.2/3.4 crank throw will not allow the 4wd front housing.............did I read it or am I dreamin' - can somebody correct me???

RB30DET FTW!

That RB31DETT will just be a slightly overbored RB30.

Nitto do the 3.2L kits for RB30 (soon?)

Spool do the 3.4L kits for RB30 (soon)

And I think RIPSNZ do a 3.2L aswell?

OR save your money and just built an RB30DET.. you'd only need the extra 200-400cc if running a HUGE turbo.

P.S. I love my 30 :(

Edited by bubba

love the comments on the rb31 block

i read his thread the other day

he has made it an rb26 open deck with new sleeves, rods and pistons and an rb30 crank

give a better bore-stroke ratio or something and is designed for driveability, torque and response

he has put a lot of work into it but its still in testing and will eventually be on sale once everything is tested thoroughly

on topic, if you want more displacement then you can't look past an rb30 with the 4wd adapter

r.i.p.s in nz will make you a forged bottom end with the adapter and ship it to oz, bolt it in, add your head and away you go

There are a few places now that do a RB30 adapter to run awd. Id say get a dirty 30 bottom end and a Nitto 3.2 crank. They say its good for 1200hp and 10,000rpm.

i like the sound of that.... on the other hand the sound of the price mite not be so good. haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...