Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got the option of either Nismo 600cc or Sard 660cc for the right price

RB26DETT

N1 turbos power fc axhaust cooler etc etc

has made 274kw on 17psi maxing the injectors.

so putting 044 intank and either of the above injectors and retune next week.

car is street cruiser / circuit car.

are these injectors similar or does the nismo have better spray pattern twin pintle etc.

mainly concerned about fuel economy.

cheers

Jez

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330643-sard-660cc-injectors-vs-nismo-600cc/
Share on other sites

was in RWD.

on that note but you shouldnt believe that rwd KW is higher than AWD KW

my old GTR made 410KW in RWD and then straight after made 419KW in AWD, this was on a dyno dynamics dyno.

going back on the dyno next wednsday after putting in 044 intank and the tomei 600cc injectors,

was maxing the old injectors out with stock fuel pressure reg

  • 8 months later...

yeah I'm pretty sure the nismo RB26 top feed 600s are single hole. nothing wrong with them though, or the sard 600s. I've used both and also the sard 700s and never had any problem with either of those 3 types. in fact I'm now using the sard 1000s and they are good too.

Nismo are 4 hole

Sard 700's are 2 hole

Sard 800 are 1 hole

That's if my memory is correct

are you sure you're not thinking of RB25 side feed injectors? this is like all the people who keep saying sard 700s don't fit RB256 fuel rails etc... they do.

Hrm i might well be. I keep getting bloody confused as I've had too many sets over the years.

Although i did sell Nismo 660's recently and fairly certain there was 4

I'll try see if i took pics of heads when i get home tonight. I took some pics, just can't remember what of exactly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are black hose clamps as well if you care. Plazmaman for example sells some: https://plazmaman.com/product/black-hose-clamps-premium-quality-stainless-breeze/
    • After using a protractor for an actually accurate assessment of what is required,  and by NOT using my uncalibrated eyeball I worked out I need a 25° silicone bend from the TB ro the MAF, but, my choice was either a 30° or a 23° (23° is a weird spec), so I grabbed the 23° one from Raceworks I also grabbed 1mtr of 3" straight from Just Jap, I needed 350mm, but they only had 300mm, or 1mtr lengths....meh Also ordered a 1/2" hose bulkhead fitting from fleabay, this has a smoothish mushroom looking head (they are designed for below the water line of boats) that will fit inside the bend, the hose bit and threaded bit looks to long, but nothing that a hacksaw cannot fix if required, the hose will then just get jamed on the threaded bit up to the retaining nut Fingers crossed and the unsightly amount of hose clamps will be reduced down to 4 once all the parts arrive 
    • Oil change does not trigger code 21. Code 21 is for coilpacks primary side connection. You can try to clear the code with a battery disconnect, hold down the brake pedal to drain capacitors through the brake lights with the ignition on for 10-15 seconds before you reconnect the battery. I have seen R35 coil conversion permanently cause this code with no ill effects so it might be the resistance it wants to see isn't quite right on one or more coilpacks. Could be inside the ECU, could be the harness, could be a coil. You can test it all if you want or just ignore until the car actually starts misfiring.
    • I forgot you have a Nistune ECU. Use Nistune to do all the tests I mentioned instead of faffing with 30+ year old electrical connectors. You can read MAF volts off that too, there are reference values in the service manual to tell you roughly what it should be in different conditions.
×
×
  • Create New...