Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G`day Looking to find BEST PRICE ON a WIDEBAND o2 sensor in Australia ,looking for LC-1 which is INNOVATE motorsport type set up.

I looked at few site`s & just wondered who has best PRIECS Australia WIDE,

Cheer`s Chuckie.

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ebay im paying around $98 for innovate sensors (innovate lm1 and lc1)

even for the new MOtec setup on my dyno my sensors are $110

i was using INNOVATE but it is unreliable and slow, as most are well aware.

All Genuine Bosch in Bosch boxes.

ebay im paying around $98 for innovate sensors (innovate lm1 and lc1)

even for the new MOtec setup on my dyno my sensors are $110

i was using INNOVATE but it is unreliable and slow, as most are well aware.

All Genuine Bosch in Bosch boxes.

When you say slow Trent, what do you mean?

I haven't had any issue with my LC1 mounted in the dump, perhaps its the lack of soot with the e85? You do give yours a hard time too. :banana:

I remember there was review in some magazine they tested a bunch of simple Wide band O2s and the Innovate had the fastest response time when against Techedge, AEM, and a few other brands.

I remember there was review in some magazine they tested a bunch of simple Wide band O2s and the Innovate had the fastest response time when against Techedge, AEM, and a few other brands.

not sure how that happens, the innovate has been pretty poor in other comparison's... especially in the trade. Warranty issues since they sold out to another company have been through the roof.

i had to get a new lc-1 under warranty and its died again now, they replaced it straight away the first time so there was no doubt it was a manafacturer fault.

anyway i purchased myne through this guy, was very helpful and returned it for me to get fixed under warranty.

http://stores.ebay.com.au/superior-auto-pa...634Q2ec0Q2em322

as attached.. each to their own.. I just wend Innovate LC-1 because of it's dual output and because it is recommended on many forums

FordMuscle.pdf

yeah its an 07 test, i used to swear by their gear used to use LC1's by the truck load in car installs (permanent). I even reckon if you search innovate it will come up with lots of praise from myself, but over the past 2 years it has become a joke.

DOA's and lc1's which wont connect etc.... even my dyno ran a few lc1's for v6 and v8 cars etc but the constant issues drove me nuts, i splashed on the MOTEC gear and it is chalk and cheese, never have i made a wiser choice the things it picks up over the LC1 is phenomenal.

I still have 2 LC1's which are backups and a Trust LM-1 (version one in black) the lm1 is 4-6 years old from memory and is a sweet unit just clunky and proof they used to make good gear as it never plays up.

BTW this guys is the shit for all tuner tools, great guy. Tell him we sent you.

Half the price of local gear.

http://tunertools.com/proddetail.asp?prod=IN-3744

i recently bought a innovate LC 1 and XD16 gauge.

had some trouble getting it to work, it was my battery causing this,

after a new battery it was much better,

ive had a few issues with it getting stuck on the heat up phase,

ive had to remove it and recalibrate it 3 times in 3 weeks,

the LOGWORKS program that comes with it wont load has a missing mts error, said to reinstall it so i did, still wont work still has mts error.

i have connected the anologue outputs into my datalogit for a wideband reading on my laptop while tuning. i have tried alot of different configurations to get it reading the same as the XD16 gauge(digital) i can get it even at idle but when under load the guage reads richer than the datalogit,

other than that the innovate is good :P

makes me worry that the readings im getting are actually correct,

i recently bought a innovate LC 1 and XD16 gauge.

had some trouble getting it to work, it was my battery causing this,

after a new battery it was much better,

ive had a few issues with it getting stuck on the heat up phase,

ive had to remove it and recalibrate it 3 times in 3 weeks,

the LOGWORKS program that comes with it wont load has a missing mts error, said to reinstall it so i did, still wont work still has mts error.

i have connected the anologue outputs into my datalogit for a wideband reading on my laptop while tuning. i have tried alot of different configurations to get it reading the same as the XD16 gauge(digital) i can get it even at idle but when under load the guage reads richer than the datalogit,

other than that the innovate is good :P

makes me worry that the readings im getting are actually correct,

i had similar problems, tried shitloads of different earths, read that you have to wire the ground to an2 and set it to delta an1-2. i tried this and the readings were different, in the end i found it closest to correct when i wired it up this way but switched off the delta an1-2. also had to use a seperate ground for a couple of wires i think, cant really remember. fkn weird shit

i had similar problems, tried shitloads of different earths, read that you have to wire the ground to an2 and set it to delta an1-2. i tried this and the readings were different, in the end i found it closest to correct when i wired it up this way but switched off the delta an1-2. also had to use a seperate ground for a couple of wires i think, cant really remember. fkn weird shit

yeh i tried the delta an1 - an2, doesnt seem to work for me, so i just use an1 and have tried to calibrate it to read the same as the gauge, but under WOT it doesnt seem to be the same,

i have tried different earths but the instructions and their website say u must try to connect all earths to one lug, even the signal and heater grounds together.

i have it working now with the gauge but every now and then it freaks out and i have to jack the car up take the 02 sensor out and do a free air calibration then refit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...